![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
Check GunBroker.com for SWFA's No Reserve and No Minimum bid firearm auctions. |
Zeiss Conquest ZRF Reticle |
Post Reply ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
BobbyD ![]() Optics GrassHopper ![]() Joined: July/25/2005 Status: Offline Points: 13 |
Thanks, Brady.
Is there any way to figure mil dot spacing at 14 power other than shooting trial and error? Is there a chart or formula or anything that shows or calculates distance between mil dots as magnification increases? |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Brady ![]() TEAM SWFA - Admin ![]() ![]() Casino Cruiser Joined: May/20/2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1838 |
If you try and range on other powers everything will have to be recalculated. Would be a lot of trial and error to come up with the correct measurements. Not sure if it's even possible to do so on other magnifications. I've never seen any charts that break each power down.
Here is a zoomed in mil dot reticle with all the measurement that would have to be re calculated:
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
sscoyote ![]() Optics Journeyman ![]() Joined: October/05/2004 Status: Offline Points: 327 |
Just happened to notice the end of the discussion here. If the power ring is properly calibrated for magnification then u should be able to recalculate the subtensions at any magnification by using a simple inversely proportional equation, since as magnification INCREASES reticle subtension DECREASES, and vice versa. Truth is, it'd probably be just as accurate as being able to reproduce the subtensions when adjusting the magnification back and forth from the magnification the reticle is supposed to be calibrated for mil subtensions (10X), but might just check it on a ruler or graph paper. Here's the calc.--
3.6"/x" = 14X/10X......... X=2.57"
Actually that'd probably make for a nice "modified ballistic reticle", with the 1st stadia zero @ 2.45 MOA, 2nd @ 4.9, 3rd @ 7.35, 4th @ 9.8, and 5th @ 12.25.
Here's the "modified mil-ranging" equation then for 14X--
tgt size (") x 100/2.57/quantity of bracketing gap occupied by tgt. = range in yds.
|
Steve
|
Post Reply ![]() |
|
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
Similar Threads: "Zeiss Conquest ZRF Reticle" | ||||
Subject | Author | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
There are no similar posts. |