New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Zeiss Conquest Duralyt vs. DL vs. Swarovski
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Check for SWFA's No Reserve and No Minimum bid firearm auctions.

Zeiss Conquest Duralyt vs. DL vs. Swarovski

 Post Reply Post Reply   Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: February/25/2015 at 03:26
yhc View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper

Joined: February/25/2015
Status: Offline
Points: 2
I am in the market for a scope to mount on my Sako 85 Kodiak 375H/H & 338 WM.

Debating between Zeiss Duralyt vs. DL in either 1.2-5 x 36 or 2-8 x 42 with illuminated reticle or a used LNIB Gen 1 Swarovski Z6 1-6x24 (non illuminated reticle).

I really do not have much experience with illuminated reticles but I suppose it's nice to have the option. I can find pretty decent price for Duralyt but I wonder whether DL is worth the price difference of ~$350 compared to Duralyt.

Which magnification option would you recommend? Primary target species will be bears and moose.

What would be a reasonable price range for the LNIB Swarovski Z6 Gen 1?

Thanks in advance for your time.

 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Similar Threads: "Zeiss Conquest Duralyt vs. DL vs. Swarovski"
Subject Author Forum Replies Last Post
Zeiss Duralyt 2-8x42 versus Swarovski AV 3-9x36 tpcollins Rifle Scopes 0
Zeiss Duralyt compared to Zeiss Victory nbama40 Member's Tests and Reviews 5
Swarovski AV vs Zeiss Conquest twilson Rifle Scopes 5 1/5/2006 7:31:17 AM
New Carl Zeiss Duralyt Scope seawolf Rifle Scopes 6
Zeiss Duralyt tophet1 Rifle Scopes 2
Swarovski V6 v Zeiss Victory HT DonDavis Rifle Scopes 7
Swarovski 10x50 or Zeiss 10x54HT Dr.Pepper Binoculars 1
Zeiss Conquest DL 1.2X5X36 tgh97531 Rifle Scopes 3
New Zeiss Conquest Duralyt Line Chris Farris Rifle Scopes 33
Zeiss Duralyt 1.2-5x36 ccoker Rifle Scopes 8

This page was generated in 0.485 seconds.