New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Zeiss Conquest 3 -15 x 42 NEW
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Check GunBroker.com for SWFA's No Reserve and No Minimum bid firearm auctions.

Zeiss Conquest 3 -15 x 42 NEW

 Post Reply Post Reply   Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: March/04/2014 at 23:26
Newfie View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper
Avatar

Joined: February/26/2014
Status: Offline
Points: 2

I just received my Zeiss Conquest HD5 3-15 x42 New Rapid Z 600 scope and I am very disappointed in its quality.

Once I started looking at the detail I noticed that the Magnification Ring marker does not line up with the actual numbers. It is 1/16 of an inch past the 3x and 1/16 of an inch past the 15x.. Zeiss America says it is correct for all other magnifications, but I wonder. Not what I expect for a $1100 scope.

A second and more important FLAW I noticed is that the reticle seems to be etched incorrectly for the 350 and 450 yards. It would appear that the 350 mark is closer to the 4 than the 3, indicating that there is more of a drop in the bullet between 300 and 350 than between 350 and 400. The same appears to be true for the 450 mark. Now I know as do most of you that the bullet drops more between 350 and 400 than between 300 and 350. Also  more between 450 and 500 than 400 and 450.

Zeiss America says they have placed those marks there to allow for the average of all the calibers tested for this range of scope as well as their computer generated results for those calibers. I was under the impression that their Ballistic Calculator determined the Magnification Ring setting for each caliber taking into account some of the field conditions. It would appear to me that this is just a cover up story and that in fact the etching is incorrect at the 350 and 450 mark.

The distance between the etching for the 3, 4, 5 and 6 all seem to be a little larger which is what I would expect. The 550 mark also appears to be correct. So why just the 350 and 450. I believe It is a FLAWED reticle and I think Zeiss should recall all their scopes and replace the flawed reticle with a corrected one. I have not tested this scope in the field. I have looked at some of their earlier scopes and the Z600 appears to be correct, but with the new Rapid Z 600 reticle it is incorrect and different from their earlier Z600 reticle.

Maybe someone can have a look at their Rapid Z 600 and post their comments.

 

 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Similar Threads: "Zeiss Conquest 3 -15 x 42 NEW"
Subject Author Forum Replies Last Post
Zeiss 12X or 15 X Conquest’s RRMan03 Binoculars 2 12/22/2006 6:19:47 AM
Zeiss Victory 8 x 42 HT for Sale KrazeLegs Optics For Sale 0
Zeiss Conquest Duralyt 2-8 X 42 For Sale bugsNbows Optics For Sale 0
Zeiss 42 or 50 johnnyo Rifle Scopes 8
SWFA SS 3-15 vs Weaver tactical super slam 3-15 BigGameBalls Rifle Scopes 0
Swarovski binos which power 7-42 or 10-42 bms Binoculars 13
zeiss or leupold scopes for ar-15 bignate79549 Rifle Scopes 2
Zeiss Reticle #42 Question noddah Rifle Scopes 1 12/3/2006 10:53:40 PM
Swarovski EL 8.5x42 or Zeiss FL 8 x 42 ND2000 Binoculars 15 2/14/2007 8:30:20 PM
Zeiss 10 x 42 FL KrazeLegs Optics For Sale 4


This page was generated in 0.313 seconds.