New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Worth While Upgrade...
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Check GunBroker.com for SWFA's No Reserve and No Minimum bid firearm auctions.

Worth While Upgrade...

 Post Reply Post Reply   Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: July/05/2012 at 15:20
jbsavage View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper


Joined: July/05/2012
Location: Georgia
Status: Offline
Points: 11
Well, this is my first post to opticstalk.com, but I have been a long time lurker here.  I currently have a Vortex Diamondback 4-12X40 (non adjustable objective lens) scope on my Savage Model 11 (.308) that I use for deer hunting as well as target shooting at the range.  I purchased it after reading all of the favorable reviews on the Diamondback line.  However, after owning it for about 2 years I have grown to dislike the incredibly short eye relief as well as the finicky eye position at maximum magnification.

I have been considering getting a Nikon Buckmaster 4.5-14x40 w/ side focus, mainly because of the amazing prices that I've seen on the Sample List. But I wasn't sure if this would be an upgrade or more of a side step.

Or would my money be better spent stepping up & purchasing a Nikon Monarch 4-16x42 or Vortex Viper HS 4-16x44?

Thanks
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: July/05/2012 at 15:23
cheaptrick View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar

Joined: September/27/2004
Location: South Carolina
Status: Offline
Points: 20468
Welcome to Optics Talk. 

Never looked through a Diamond Back, but I really liked the Buckmaster in that very flavor I had several years ago. Had it on a .300 RUM Sendero and it served it and me well. 

Really a great buy, IMO. 
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: July/05/2012 at 15:27
jbsavage View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper


Joined: July/05/2012
Location: Georgia
Status: Offline
Points: 11
Originally posted by cheaptrick cheaptrick wrote:

Welcome to Optics Talk. 

Never looked through a Diamond Back, but I really liked the Buckmaster in that very flavor I had several years ago. Had it on a .300 RUM Sendero and it served it and me well. 

Really a great buy, IMO. 


How's the eye relief & eye positioning at max magnification?
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: July/05/2012 at 15:48
RotoReuter_DM View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice
Avatar

Joined: December/09/2011
Location: WI
Status: Offline
Points: 296
I would save for something nicer than the Buckmaster. The Diamondback is better IMHO than the buckmaster. The Diamondback does get picky in high mag. But I have some experience with the buckmasters and didn't like anything about them. Super narrow field of view.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: July/06/2012 at 09:07
jbsavage View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper


Joined: July/05/2012
Location: Georgia
Status: Offline
Points: 11
Ok.  Well, looks like I have one yea & one nay.  What is everyone's thoughts on the Viper HS 4-16x44 & the Nikon Monarch 4-16x42?
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: July/06/2012 at 09:36
Chris Farris II View Drop Down
TEAM SWFA - Staff
TEAM SWFA - Staff
Avatar
MODERATOR

Joined: August/13/2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3063
I would save up for the Monarch or Viper HS. Both great scopes for the $$.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: July/06/2012 at 11:07
lucytuma View Drop Down
Optics Jedi Knight
Optics Jedi Knight
Avatar

Joined: November/25/2007
Location: Wisconsin
Status: Offline
Points: 5389
I agree with stepping up to the next level. Going from the diamond back to the buckmasters is as you said "a side step".
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: July/06/2012 at 11:17
bugsNbows View Drop Down
Optics Jedi Master
Optics Jedi Master
Avatar
bowsNbugs

Joined: March/10/2008
Location: Florida
Status: Offline
Points: 9285
jbsavage...welcome to posting on the OT Forums! IMO, the Viper HS barely edges out the Nikon Monarch. For the $, it's a winner. I'd go that route if the decision were mine. Yippee
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: July/06/2012 at 16:03
KIMBER8400AT View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice
Avatar
Vig

Joined: June/24/2012
Location: CA
Status: Offline
Points: 117
Have u looked at bushnell elite doa?
I currently have one and the doa reticle is very accurate for holdovers.
Just anither option to consider.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: July/09/2012 at 14:39
jbsavage View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper


Joined: July/05/2012
Location: Georgia
Status: Offline
Points: 11
Originally posted by KIMBER8400AT KIMBER8400AT wrote:

Have u looked at bushnell elite doa?
I currently have one and the doa reticle is very accurate for holdovers.
Just anither option to consider.


I can't say that I have looked at one.  I'll add it to my list, & try to look at it in person.  Thanks!
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: July/09/2012 at 15:38
Alan Robertson View Drop Down
Optics Master
Optics Master
Avatar

Joined: October/31/2009
Location: Oklahoma
Status: Offline
Points: 1721
Originally posted by jbsavage jbsavage wrote:

Originally posted by KIMBER8400AT KIMBER8400AT wrote:

Have u looked at bushnell elite doa?
I currently have one and the doa reticle is very accurate for holdovers.
Just anither option to consider.


I can't say that I have looked at one.  I'll add it to my list, & try to look at it in person.  Thanks!
Welcome to OT forums jbsavage
While the more expensive Bushnell Elites have better glass than the Diamondback, they don't have any better eye relief- 3.3".
That's another side step.

Don't know your budget, but here are some great scopes with longer eye relief:

http://swfa.com/Minox-3-9x40-ZA3-Riflescope-P46135.aspx

http://swfa.com/Pentax-3-15x50-Gameseeker-Rifle-Scope-P45834.aspx

http://swfa.com/Zeiss-3-9x40-Conquest-Rifle-Scope-P608.aspx

Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: July/09/2012 at 17:38
stickbow46 View Drop Down
Optics Master Extraordinaire
Optics Master Extraordinaire
Avatar

Joined: January/07/2009
Location: Benton, Pa
Status: Offline
Points: 4673

Welcome to the OT!

+1 with Alan.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: July/10/2012 at 07:35
jbsavage View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper


Joined: July/05/2012
Location: Georgia
Status: Offline
Points: 11
Originally posted by Alan Robertson Alan Robertson wrote:

Originally posted by jbsavage jbsavage wrote:

Originally posted by KIMBER8400AT KIMBER8400AT wrote:

Have u looked at bushnell elite doa?
I currently have one and the doa reticle is very accurate for holdovers.
Just anither option to consider.


I can't say that I have looked at one.  I'll add it to my list, & try to look at it in person.  Thanks!
Welcome to OT forums jbsavage
While the more expensive Bushnell Elites have better glass than the Diamondback, they don't have any better eye relief- 3.3".
That's another side step.

Don't know your budget, but here are some great scopes with longer eye relief:

http://swfa.com/Minox-3-9x40-ZA3-Riflescope-P46135.aspx

http://swfa.com/Pentax-3-15x50-Gameseeker-Rifle-Scope-P45834.aspx

http://swfa.com/Zeiss-3-9x40-Conquest-Rifle-Scope-P608.aspx



I was trying to keep it under $500.00, but would really like a 4-16 or a 3-15 magnification with a side focus for parallax .  The scopes that I was looking at was the Vortex Viper HS 4-16x44 or the Nikon Monarch 4-16x42.  Both have a constant 4 inches of eye relief.  However I'm not sure how finicky the eye positioning is on these two.  Also how does the Pentax that you recommended stack up compared to these two?

Thanks
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: July/10/2012 at 08:15
DCAMM94 View Drop Down
Optics Master Extraordinaire
Optics Master Extraordinaire
Avatar

Joined: April/19/2008
Location: Fort Worth
Status: Offline
Points: 3138
At 16x, the eye box is pretty narrow on the vortex HS.  At just a little less, it's not bad, and as you cruise down toward 8x, it's very forgiving.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: July/10/2012 at 10:44
jbsavage View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper


Joined: July/05/2012
Location: Georgia
Status: Offline
Points: 11
Originally posted by DCAMM94 DCAMM94 wrote:

At 16x, the eye box is pretty narrow on the vortex HS.  At just a little less, it's not bad, and as you cruise down toward 8x, it's very forgiving.


How's the eye relief at 16x?
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: July/10/2012 at 11:41
Alan Robertson View Drop Down
Optics Master
Optics Master
Avatar

Joined: October/31/2009
Location: Oklahoma
Status: Offline
Points: 1721
jbsavage said:
"I was trying to keep it under $500.00, but would really like a 4-16 or a 3-15 magnification with a side focus for parallax .  The scopes that I was looking at was the Vortex Viper HS 4-16x44 or the Nikon Monarch 4-16x42.  Both have a constant 4 inches of eye relief.  However I'm not sure how finicky the eye positioning is on these two.  Also how does the Pentax that you recommended stack up compared to these two?"
_______________________
The Gameseeker glass is between a Diamondback and Monarch or Viper. Pentax scopes were designed/built with a great deal of assistance from Burris, which is the king of the big eyebox, but you'd just have to check one yourself. Lightseeker XL's are Pentax best glass.

This may be your answer:
http://www.samplelist.com/-P54076.aspx
Here are some more to look at:
http://wfa.com/Meopta-4-12x50-Meopro-Rifle-Scope-P45968.aspx 
http://swfa.com/Hawke-45-14x42-Sidewinder-Tactical-30mm-Riflescope-P44553.aspx 
If you could swing it...
http://www.samplelist.com/-P56934.aspx
http://www.samplelist.com/-P55422.aspx 

One thing... if you don't like the Diamondback short eye relief, you don't like it, but it should be good to go on a .308, provided you don't crawl up on it and whack yourself.

Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: July/10/2012 at 11:49
DCAMM94 View Drop Down
Optics Master Extraordinaire
Optics Master Extraordinaire
Avatar

Joined: April/19/2008
Location: Fort Worth
Status: Offline
Points: 3138
Originally posted by jbsavage jbsavage wrote:

Originally posted by DCAMM94 DCAMM94 wrote:

At 16x, the eye box is pretty narrow on the vortex HS.  At just a little less, it's not bad, and as you cruise down toward 8x, it's very forgiving.


How's the eye relief at 16x?


I don't think it's bad at all, but I've never measured it.  According to the Website, relief is 4", so even Vortex says it's almost a full inch more than the D-back.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: July/10/2012 at 12:02
Dyelynn View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice
Avatar

Joined: March/07/2011
Location: Washington
Status: Offline
Points: 231
i don't think they've been mentioned before, but there's also minox...

4-20x50 with side focus
http://www.samplelist.com/Minox-4-20X50-ZA5-Rifle-Scope-DEMO-B-P55325.aspx

3-15x50 with side focus
http://swfa.com/Minox-3-15x50-ZA5-Riflescope-P48162.aspx
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: July/10/2012 at 13:15
jbsavage View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper


Joined: July/05/2012
Location: Georgia
Status: Offline
Points: 11
Originally posted by Dyelynn Dyelynn wrote:

i don't think they've been mentioned before, but there's also minox...

4-20x50 with side focus
http://www.samplelist.com/Minox-4-20X50-ZA5-Rifle-Scope-DEMO-B-P55325.aspx

3-15x50 with side focus
http://swfa.com/Minox-3-15x50-ZA5-Riflescope-P48162.aspx


Thanks for the suggestions, but unfortunately those break the $500.00 budget.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: July/10/2012 at 13:37
Marine24 View Drop Down
Optics Journeyman
Optics Journeyman


Joined: June/07/2010
Location: Monument, CO
Status: Offline
Points: 556
I've been a big fan of Nikon's Monarch line with the 4-16x44 with the BDC or Mil-Dot reticle standard on my bolt guns.  The eye relief has been consistent throughout the magnification range, which was a nice feature when I had it mounted on a 340 Weatherby.
 
Vortex's Viper/Viper HS line is also a very quality scope.  I have the 2-7x on a Weatherby XXII and is a great scope for the rimfire.
 
Overall, the Monarch and Viper line are both quality scopes and represent good value for the money.
 
Lot of good choices in this price point, but believe you will be very pleased with either of them.
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Similar Threads: "Worth While Upgrade..."
Subject Author Forum Replies Last Post
meostar worth the upgrade from monarch rooshooter Rifle Scopes 4
What are these worth? Kama480 Binoculars 5
Need an idea of worth Pzkfw Rifle Scopes 5
Rothman 8x40 Japanese-made binoculars -- worth? D101 Binoculars 5
Bushnell Elite Upgrade Chris Farris Rifle Scopes 0
What are these binocs worth? wayseer Binoculars 1
Options for upgrading from a Zen Ray ED2 20-60x Marine24 Spotting Scopes 16
worth the money?? bhaven Binoculars 9
Bino Upgrade question matchetman Binoculars 2
Upgrade options bookworm Binoculars 6


This page was generated in 0.328 seconds.