New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Which Zeiss Conquest for 17HMR?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Check GunBroker.com for SWFA's No Reserve and No Minimum bid firearm auctions.

Which Zeiss Conquest for 17HMR?

 Post Reply Post Reply   Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: May/23/2010 at 04:05
leithfield View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper


Joined: March/29/2006
Status: Offline
Points: 1

After considerable research I have determined to equip my 17HMR with a Zeiss Conquest scope.  My intended use is 80% rabbit shooting (primarily disk & dawn) and 20% paper punching. I prefer the 50mm objective for it's advantage in light gathering over the 44mm.

The two options I have in mind are as follows:
1/ Zeiss Conquest 4.5-14x50AO MC (Parallax 30 - infinity)
2/ Zeiss Conquest 6.5-20x50AO MC (Parallax 50 - infinity)

I would appreciate advice on:
- The real world minimum focusing distance of each
- Reticle choice for my application (my personal preferences are Z-Plex & Mil-dot)
- Target knobs or hunting knobs.

Which would you choose for a 17HMR application and why?

Thank you.

Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: May/23/2010 at 07:41
trigger29 View Drop Down
Optics Master Extraordinaire
Optics Master Extraordinaire
Avatar
X = 180 Y = 90 (X+Pyro)+(Y-Pyro) = ?

Joined: September/29/2007
Location: South Dakota
Status: Offline
Points: 4292
Personally I'd go with a 4.5-14x44, and mount it lower, but depending on where you are, you may need the light. I live on the plains, and even 1/2 hour after sunset my scope is still very bright. There will not be a huge difference between the 50 mm and the 44. (except in price) The 50mm will have a .43mm bigger exit pupil.  Mine will focus to 30 yards easily. (I sometimes use it to see the numbers on my chrono) I think 14x is plenty of magnification for the ranges a 17hmr is useful for. And for me, the reticle choice would go to mil-dot, just for ranging purposes, and I like to play with mil-dots just because it's a parishable skill. I would have to have target turrets to dial in the shots. The HMR is quite capable of making longer shots on rabbit sized game. My longest so far is a touch over 200 yards on critters, but have hit milk jugs twice as far out.
 
Here is the scope I'd put on. This is the target turret version, although the picture doesnt' show it. Unfortunately, it doesn't have a lot of internal adjustment. It should be enough to get you to about 350 yards though.
 
This suggestion is based on my conditions here, depending on the areas you shoot, and the ranges you are likely to encounter, that opinion changes. How far away do you normally shoot at rabbits? Do you live in flat ground, or mountainous terrain? Heavily wooded, or scattered timber? These are all things I would think about before pulling the trigger on this one.
 
Oh, and welcome to the OT! Good luck with your decision.


Edited by trigger29 - May/23/2010 at 07:41
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Similar Threads: "Which Zeiss Conquest for 17HMR?"
Subject Author Forum Replies Last Post
Bushnell 4200 vs Zeiss Conquest osucowboy76 Rifle Scopes 8 9/22/2004 9:19:03 PM
sightron VS. Zeiss conquest rob70 Tactical Scopes 0 8/26/2004 6:33:32 PM
Zeiss Conquest ran out of adjustment emperor91108 Rifle Scopes 7 9/8/2004 12:10:00 PM
Bought a Zeiss conquest 3-9 from SWFA SAKO75 Rifle Scopes 2 11/3/2004 11:51:00 AM
Zeiss Conquest Paramudd Rifle Scopes 6 11/9/2004 12:26:54 PM
Zeiss Conquest 3.5-10x50 Matthew Rifle Scopes 7 10/31/2004 7:45:31 PM
ring spacing on zeiss 4.5x14x44 conquest power-strings Rifle Scopes 11 12/16/2004 8:46:39 PM
Zeiss Conquest gozarian Rifle Scopes 4 12/23/2004 12:51:27 PM
ZEISS 4.5-14X50 CONQUEST Just Tex Rifle Scopes 4 1/1/2005 1:36:59 PM
zeiss conquest 10x30’s handwerk Binoculars 1 4/27/2005 2:54:57 PM


This page was generated in 0.266 seconds.