New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Weaver 40/44 3-9x40  vs classic 2.5-7x28 rimfire?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Check GunBroker.com for SWFA's No Reserve and No Minimum bid firearm auctions.

Weaver 40/44 3-9x40 vs classic 2.5-7x28 rimfire?

 Post Reply Post Reply   Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: April/19/2014 at 20:05
tedtf View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper


Joined: January/19/2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 32

Looking for new scope for CZ 455 American.  trying to decide between Weaver 40/44 3-9x40mm Rimfire and the Weaver Classic Rimfire 2.5-7x28mm scopes.  No target shooting, just critter getting scope. Which scope is better?

I was going to use Warne med rings 721m so I want to make sure the 3-9x40 would clear the bolt on med rings also. Thanks

Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: April/20/2014 at 06:43
cheaptrick View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar

Joined: September/27/2004
Location: South Carolina
Status: Offline
Points: 20468
My CZ has the 2-7x Rimfire and I like it. I haven't seen the other. 
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Similar Threads: "Weaver 40/44 3-9x40 vs classic 2.5-7x28 rimfire?"
Subject Author Forum Replies Last Post
Weaver 40/44 questions Al Nyhus Rifle Scopes 3
weaver 40/44 vs sightron SII for 17HMR hunterco Rifle Scopes 0
Weaver 40/44 Riflescope Fotis Rifle Scopes 0
New 40/44 series Weaver scopes? mickey Rifle Scopes 9
Weaver 40/44 50yd. parallax theavrin Rimfire / Airgun 2
Nikon P-Rimfire 2-7x32 or Weaver Classic Rimfire beelzibub Rimfire / Airgun 0
winchester 1892 caliber 44-40 grandslam Firearms 10
Monarch 5-20 x 44 vs, Leupold VXII 6-18 x 40 JagerDog Varmint Scopes 4
which ne 40,42,44 or 50mm. ezell630 Rifle Scopes 7
Opinions on weaver 40/44 6.5-20? Fotis Rifle Scopes 1


This page was generated in 0.471 seconds.