New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Variable Power $650 Budget
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Check GunBroker.com for SWFA's No Reserve and No Minimum bid firearm auctions.

Variable Power $650 Budget

 Post Reply Post Reply   Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options Page  1 2>
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: March/11/2008 at 20:50
Second Amend View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper
Avatar

Joined: March/11/2008
Status: Offline
Points: 38
I've got a Rock River Varmint 20" with NM 2-stage trigger and PRS stock, and am looking for a scope for it.   This rifle will be mostly used on the bench for target ranges from 100-400 yards, with the possibility of also trying farther distances. 

I'm looking to purchase a variable power scope that would be flexible enough at these distances, but still come within my budget of $600 (more or less).  I need enough power to be able to shoot for as much accuracy as I can.

My initial choices are:
- Bushnell 6-24x50 Elite 4200 30mm (with exposed turrets) $570
- Millet LRS-1 (6-24x56 35mm) $450-500

I really like the reputation and quality of the Super Sniper scopes, so I may consider a 16x.  When is their variable coming out?  It may be a no-brainer for me.

What would you recommend and why?
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: March/12/2008 at 01:19
koshkin View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar
Dark Lord of Optics

Joined: June/15/2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 10978
The two choices you have are both very good and should work well for you.

Generally, I seldom use magnifications above 16x or so, even from the bench, so I would suggest looking at some 4-16x scopes or similar:

Nikon Monarch 4-16x50 or 5-20x50
Bushnell Elite 4200 4-16x50
Sightron S2 Big Sky 4.5-14x44SS or 4-16x42AO or 6.5-20x50SS or 6-24x42
Vortex Viper 6.5-20x44 or 6.5-20x50

Since you are shooting from the becnh and AR rifles are pretty friendly to large objective lenses, I would probably recommend going with a 50mm or greater objective lens in one of the configurations above.

ILya
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: March/12/2008 at 01:42
koshkin View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar
Dark Lord of Optics

Joined: June/15/2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 10978
The two choices you have are both very good and should work well for you.

Generally, I seldom use magnifications above 16x or so, even from the bench, so I would suggest looking at some 4-16x scopes or similar:

Nikon Monarch 4-16x50 or 5-20x50
Bushnell Elite 4200 4-16x50
Sightron S2 Big Sky 4.5-14x44SS or 4-16x42AO or 6.5-20x50SS or 6-24x42
Vortex Viper 6.5-20x44 or 6.5-20x50

Since you are shooting from the becnh and AR rifles are pretty friendly to large objective lenses, I would probably recommend going with a 50mm or greater objective lens in one of the configurations above.

ILya
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: March/12/2008 at 06:10
cyborg View Drop Down
Optics God
Optics God
Avatar
God of Wind

Joined: August/24/2007
Location: North Georgia
Status: Offline
Points: 12082
Look at the new 6500 series elites as well. You can also find some screaming deals on the sample list.
Welcome and enjoy your stay at OT
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: March/12/2008 at 19:22
Second Amend View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper
Avatar

Joined: March/11/2008
Status: Offline
Points: 38
Does anyone think I should just go with the SS 16x42 and be done with it?  Or am I limiting myself here without the flexibility a variable scope offers?
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: March/12/2008 at 19:49
Dolphin View Drop Down
Optics Master
Optics Master


Joined: October/05/2006
Location: North Carolina
Status: Offline
Points: 1795
I would go with the variable.  Your choice of the Bushnell up to 24x is not a bad choice if you want to shoot beyond 400 yards.  It is a quality scope and the optical quality at 24x should be good, even though I have never had the opportunity to look through that particular scope.  One thing to remember, it is better to have more magnification with your initial purchase than less, if that is important, as you will find yourself wanting another scope in the future if you feel you are short changed.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: March/12/2008 at 21:01
Second Amend View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper
Avatar

Joined: March/11/2008
Status: Offline
Points: 38
Originally posted by Dolphin Dolphin wrote:

I would go with the variable.  Your choice of the Bushnell up to 24x is not a bad choice if you want to shoot beyond 400 yards.  It is a quality scope and the optical quality at 24x should be good, even though I have never had the opportunity to look through that particular scope.  One thing to remember, it is better to have more magnification with your initial purchase than less, if that is important, as you will find yourself wanting another scope in the future if you feel you are short changed.


This is my logic as well, though I have to keep in mind that one scope can't do it all.
I like the Millet LRS-1 on paper, but I wonder where it would fare on the recent chart Chris put up.  If it has the optics of LX-III or 4200, and is built like a SS, then I'd consider it.  But who wouldn't?
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: March/13/2008 at 06:36
trigger29 View Drop Down
Optics Master Extraordinaire
Optics Master Extraordinaire
Avatar
X = 180 Y = 90 (X+Pyro)+(Y-Pyro) = ?

Joined: September/29/2007
Location: South Dakota
Status: Offline
Points: 4304
http://www.swfa.com/pc-9792-259-zeiss-3-9x50-conquest-rifle-scope.aspx
May be another one to look at. I don't know if thats enough magnification for you, but the reticle really lends itself to long range shooting, and should be pretty good optically as well.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: March/13/2008 at 07:24
Dolphin View Drop Down
Optics Master
Optics Master


Joined: October/05/2006
Location: North Carolina
Status: Offline
Points: 1795
I would stick with the Elite 4200 over any Millet product.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: March/13/2008 at 11:03
Second Amend View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper
Avatar

Joined: March/11/2008
Status: Offline
Points: 38
Originally posted by Dolphin Dolphin wrote:

I would stick with the Elite 4200 over any Millet product.


It may be the obvious choice, but what are your reasons?
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: March/13/2008 at 12:14
Urimaginaryfrnd View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar
Resident Redneck

Joined: June/20/2005
Location: Iowa
Status: Offline
Points: 13882
Ior 4-14x50
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: March/13/2008 at 12:27
supertool73 View Drop Down
Optics Jedi Master
Optics Jedi Master
Avatar
Superstool

Joined: January/03/2008
Location: Utah
Status: Offline
Points: 9533
Holy smokes 24x is way to much for 400 yard shooting.  I guess if you want to see the grains of the paper it will work.  10x works great for out to 1000+. 
Over magnification can be a bad thing.  I had a 24x IOR and never used it above 14x for actual shooting, they start getting dark because the exit pupil gets small and you start to loose the quality of the image you are seeing.  I think a scope with 16x is plenty for virtually any type of long range shooting. 
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: March/13/2008 at 17:01
Dolphin View Drop Down
Optics Master
Optics Master


Joined: October/05/2006
Location: North Carolina
Status: Offline
Points: 1795
Originally posted by Second Amend Second Amend wrote:

Originally posted by Dolphin Dolphin wrote:

I would stick with the Elite 4200 over any Millet product.


It may be the obvious choice, but what are your reasons?
 I have never owned a Millet product, but my primary reason is based on the responses that I have heard on the OT and the failure rate.  Now that being said, I have also heard that they have made improvements.  I have peered through a Millet at our local gun shop and it was optically clean.  But, other than that, I cannot tell you first hand anymore.  I own an Elite 4200 and it is a great scope.  All other, or for the most part, owners of the 4200s feel the same way.  Thus my reasoning.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: March/13/2008 at 17:38
3_tens View Drop Down
Optics Jedi Knight
Optics Jedi Knight
Avatar

Joined: January/08/2007
Location: Oklahoma
Status: Offline
Points: 7182
Here is a Kahles that is doing good for me. It is slightly over your budget.  Anyway a budget is nothing more than a target. Something to shoot at.

Edited by 3_tens - March/13/2008 at 18:59
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: March/13/2008 at 21:30
Second Amend View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper
Avatar

Joined: March/11/2008
Status: Offline
Points: 38
Originally posted by Urimaginaryfrnd Urimaginaryfrnd wrote:

Ior 4-14x50


For under $650? Link?
Big%20Grin
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: March/13/2008 at 22:18
Second Amend View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper
Avatar

Joined: March/11/2008
Status: Offline
Points: 38
Originally posted by Dolphin Dolphin wrote:

Originally posted by Second Amend Second Amend wrote:

Originally posted by Dolphin Dolphin wrote:

I would stick with the Elite 4200 over any Millet product.


It may be the obvious choice, but what are your reasons?
 I have never owned a Millet product, but my primary reason is based on the responses that I have heard on the OT and the failure rate.  Now that being said, I have also heard that they have made improvements.  I have peered through a Millet at our local gun shop and it was optically clean.  But, other than that, I cannot tell you first hand anymore.  I own an Elite 4200 and it is a great scope.  All other, or for the most part, owners of the 4200s feel the same way.  Thus my reasoning.


Fair enough. Points taken, and thanks.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: March/13/2008 at 23:37
Second Amend View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper
Avatar

Joined: March/11/2008
Status: Offline
Points: 38
One of my range buddies swears by IOR.

I'm looking at the 4-14x50 Tactical 30mm scope that sells for around $1K.  I can probably stretch my budget a little if I think it's worth the extra money over the 4200.

What do you think of Mil-dot vs MP-8?
Exposed turrets vs non-exposed?
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: March/14/2008 at 07:14
trigger29 View Drop Down
Optics Master Extraordinaire
Optics Master Extraordinaire
Avatar
X = 180 Y = 90 (X+Pyro)+(Y-Pyro) = ?

Joined: September/29/2007
Location: South Dakota
Status: Offline
Points: 4304
http://www.swfa.com/pc-9798-259-zeiss-45-14x50-conquest-rifle-scope.aspx    
Rapid-z 800 4.5-14x44 Conquest
 
Kahles Helia CL Multizero $599
Both would be an improvement over the 4200. I have the Zeiss on a .270 WSM and almost cried at the thought of spending so much for a scope, but have never looked back since I got it. Just love it. Going to buy a Multizero now.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: March/14/2008 at 21:23
Second Amend View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper
Avatar

Joined: March/11/2008
Status: Offline
Points: 38
Great choices you guy are providing.

My budget is now $1K, since it'll be  4-6 weeks before my rifle is ready.
I'm seriously considering the Zeiss Conquest 6.5-20x50.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: March/14/2008 at 21:37
supertool73 View Drop Down
Optics Jedi Master
Optics Jedi Master
Avatar
Superstool

Joined: January/03/2008
Location: Utah
Status: Offline
Points: 9533
I would go with the IOR, the MP8 blows away the mildot reticle.  
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: March/14/2008 at 23:12
Second Amend View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper
Avatar

Joined: March/11/2008
Status: Offline
Points: 38
Originally posted by superstool73 superstool73 wrote:

I would go with the IOR, the MP8 blows away the mildot reticle.  

How so?

The IOR is a contender.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: March/14/2008 at 23:23
supertool73 View Drop Down
Optics Jedi Master
Optics Jedi Master
Avatar
Superstool

Joined: January/03/2008
Location: Utah
Status: Offline
Points: 9533
They have half mil marks and multiple widths of the marks that can be used for more measurement in ranging.  It is easier to range with the 1/2 mil marks as sometimes you may need to use 1.8 mils or 1.9 mils to get an accurate measurement for ranging the particular distance.  That is much more difficult to break down when you only have a mark every mil to judge with. Also the center dot that is used in place of the cross hair is much superior in my opinion.  
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: March/14/2008 at 23:24
supertool73 View Drop Down
Optics Jedi Master
Optics Jedi Master
Avatar
Superstool

Joined: January/03/2008
Location: Utah
Status: Offline
Points: 9533
But all that being said if all you are ever are going to do is shoot on a range at known distances the mildot or MP8 will serve no practical purpose other than maybe hold over.  
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: March/14/2008 at 23:28
Second Amend View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper
Avatar

Joined: March/11/2008
Status: Offline
Points: 38
Originally posted by superstool73 superstool73 wrote:

But all that being said if all you are ever are going to do is shoot on a range at known distances the mildot or MP8 will serve no practical purpose other than maybe hold over.  


Thanks.  You get more refinement with the MP8, but it seems so cluttered.

What's your (or anyone's) take on the illuminated reticle and exposed knobs?
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: March/14/2008 at 23:48
supertool73 View Drop Down
Optics Jedi Master
Optics Jedi Master
Avatar
Superstool

Joined: January/03/2008
Location: Utah
Status: Offline
Points: 9533
Its not cluttered, they work great. 

Exposed are good if you plan on making adjustments all the time for different ranges and windage.  If you don't plan on that no need to have them.

Lit reticles perform best in low light, at dark they are pretty much over powering even on the lower setting.  If your target is lit up pretty well, they may benefit you some but in darkness they are pretty hard to use as it becomes very hard to make out your target with the bright red light in the scope.
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  1 2>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Similar Threads: "Variable Power $650 Budget"
Subject Author Forum Replies Last Post
Any higher power only variables? mjzman Rifle Scopes 1
Variable-power scope disassembly dbooksta Rifle Scopes 4
Fixed Power vs variable power Bonefish Rifle Scopes 24
Fixed power vs Variable power scopes Roy Finn Rifle Scopes 39
Variable Power vers Fixed Power GuytonSqHunter Tactical Scopes 26
variable versus fixed power jackofalltrades Rifle Scopes 9
best optics $650 and under kelly1278 Rifle Scopes 24
Lower power variable, your thoughts please SixCats! Rifle Scopes 20
Help me choose a low power variable Nitehunter Rifle Scopes 9
Need advice on a lower power Variable for Ruger Co bulletslap Rifle Scopes 17


This page was generated in 0.361 seconds.