New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - True Ballistic Range????
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Check GunBroker.com for SWFA's No Reserve and No Minimum bid firearm auctions.

True Ballistic Range????
 Post Reply Post Reply   Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: December/06/2008 at 16:43
djackson1125 View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper
Avatar

Joined: December/03/2008
Location: North Carolina
Status: Offline
Points: 6
I have been looking into getting a decent rangefinder and i am not real sure what the "true ballistic range" is. what is it? is it necessary?
‘‘In a polity, each citizen is to possess his own arms, which are not supplied or owned by the state.’’

— Aristotle
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: December/06/2008 at 19:01
Dale Clifford View Drop Down
Optics Jedi Knight
Optics Jedi Knight


Joined: July/04/2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 5087
ballistic range varies with inclination and declination of muzzle angle, usually shorter than horizontal ballistic range. your need will depend on what kind of shooting you do. long range shooting (past 600 yds) with steep angles would of course, benefit more.
 
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: December/06/2008 at 19:46
trigger29 View Drop Down
Optics Master Extraordinaire
Optics Master Extraordinaire
Avatar
X = 180 Y = 90 (X+Pyro)+(Y-Pyro) = ?

Joined: September/29/2007
Location: South Dakota
Status: Offline
Points: 4341
How flat are the areas you hunt, and how much are you considering spending for a "decent" rangefinder?

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: December/07/2008 at 21:54
djackson1125 View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper
Avatar

Joined: December/03/2008
Location: North Carolina
Status: Offline
Points: 6
I hunt very flat land.. and i'm willing to spending up to 250-300 bucks
‘‘In a polity, each citizen is to possess his own arms, which are not supplied or owned by the state.’’

— Aristotle
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: December/08/2008 at 18:05
lucznik View Drop Down
Optics Master
Optics Master


Joined: November/27/2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1436
Originally posted by djackson1125 djackson1125 wrote:

I hunt very flat land.. and i'm willing to spending up to 250-300 bucks

Then you won't need one that provides you with the "true ballistic range."  
 
This issue only becomes significant when the shots are long and the angles are steep.  Even then, for most hunting circumstances simply aiming a little low (regardless of whether the shot is uphill or downhill) will adequately compensate for any linear vs. true ballistic range differences.
 
I have hunted in the Rocky Mountains of Utah and Wyoming all my life and I have never missed a shot due to mis-calculating the compensation needed for an uphill/downhill shot.
 
 
What if the hokey pokey really is what it's all about?
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: December/09/2008 at 05:16
trigger29 View Drop Down
Optics Master Extraordinaire
Optics Master Extraordinaire
Avatar
X = 180 Y = 90 (X+Pyro)+(Y-Pyro) = ?

Joined: September/29/2007
Location: South Dakota
Status: Offline
Points: 4341
While I don't know how far you are shooting, and it's way out of your listed budget, if I were you I would consider saving a bit more and buying one of these.
 
 
Then never be upset with your rangefinder again. (Unless you have a need for shooting over 1000 yds. In which case you should be looking at spending more anyway.) If that is impossible, this may work for you too. I just know that I was never happy with a rangefinder until I bought a Leica, and anybody who owns one seems to agree.
 
 
I really don't have much experience with these, though they seem to get pretty fair reviews.


Edited by trigger29 - December/09/2008 at 05:19

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Similar Threads: "True Ballistic Range????"
Subject Author Forum Replies Last Post
There are no similar posts.
Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.10
Copyright ©2001-2017 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.281 seconds.