![]() |
|
Tell the Difference |
Post Reply
|
Page 123> |
| Author | ||
lucznik
Optics Master
Joined: November/27/2004 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 1376 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Topic: Tell the DifferencePosted: December/28/2006 at 21:24 |
|
|
Sorry, I don't know the answer to your questions.
I have very limited knowledge about Swift products and absolutely none about Kowas. (I've actually never even seen a Kowa optic.) |
||
|
What if the hokey pokey really is what it's all about?
|
||
|
||
Bird Watcher
Optics Professional
Joined: August/30/2006 Location: Rocky Mt. High Online Status: Offline Posts: 858 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: December/27/2006 at 21:51 |
|
|
Great...Thanks!
|
||
|
||
Acenturian
Optics Journeyman
Joined: September/07/2004 Online Status: Offline Posts: 538 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: December/27/2006 at 21:16 |
|
|
Bird Watcher: I don't know if there is any connection between the Kowa genesis or the Swift Audubon, but yes, my Swifts were made in Japan.
AC |
||
|
If You're In A Fair Fight, You Didn't Plan It Properly
- Anonymous |
||
|
||
Bird Watcher
Optics Professional
Joined: August/30/2006 Location: Rocky Mt. High Online Status: Offline Posts: 858 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: December/27/2006 at 19:30 |
|
|
koshkin and lucznik,
Do either of you know if there is any connection between the Swift 8.5x44 and the Kowa Genesis 8.5x44 binocular. Does the Swift come out of Japan? Have either of you heard anything about the Kowa mid-range to top-of-the-line binoculars? The Genesis 10.5x44 costs around $1,400. The Genesis 8.5x44 costs around $1,260. Edited by Bird Watcher |
||
|
||
lucznik
Optics Master
Joined: November/27/2004 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 1376 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: December/27/2006 at 13:12 |
|
Actually, I would tend to agree with that comparison of roof to porro prices vs. value. (At least, generally speaking.) The super cheapo Tascos, Bushnells, Simmons, etc. are of course, worthless but, once you jump to the $100+ mark and are dealing with quality instruments like Nikon Action Extremes, Pentax PCF WP IIs, Bushnell Legends, etc. you really do get many times the optical quality for much less $$$$. Of course, the trade off is that the porro prism binocular is going to be much larger, heavier, etc.
As has already been pointed out, only the porro prism B&L Discoverer was discontinued. I have one in 10x42 (it was also made in an 8x42 configuration) and it is a superb binocular. I would imagine that only a few people at Bushnell can give the authoritative/definitive reason for it being discontinued but, I can venture a guess. This binocular retailed for a bit over $400 (putting it into the same class as the current Minox porro offerings) and it is worth every penny. The problem is, this is a rough spot in the market for a porro to try to hold. For $400 there are a lot of very good roof prism binoculars available and they will all be smaller, lighter, more compact, and more comfortable to pack around. They are certainly not as good optically as the porro prism binocular but, (as I already mentioned) most people won't be able to initially see those differences. What's more, those who do will often still choose to sacrifice that little bit of optical quality for the convenience of the smaller roof prism package. Heck, if it were strictly a function of optical quality, no one would ever buy Swarovski ELs, Zeiss FLs, Leica Ultravids, etc. Why, do you ask? Because both Zeiss and Swarovski make super-premium ($1000+) porro prism binoculars that put those others to shame. How many of them have you seen lately, though? Not many, if any I would bet. I would even dare venture that 95+% of the optics consumers in the world are blissfully unaware of their very existence.
Porros seem to do pretty well in the $100 - $200 range where their optical advantages tend to be more obvious and the budget-conscious consumer tends to be more willing to accept the greater size of the porro prism design. Jump to the "high-dollar" arena for porros however, and they have a much harder "row to hoe" to make the sale. |
||
|
What if the hokey pokey really is what it's all about?
|
||
|
||
koshkin
Optics Jedi Knight
Dark Lord of Optics Joined: June/15/2004 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 6306 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: December/27/2006 at 11:58 |
|
|
For my personal use I would probably take Minox porros over any binocular onthe list. Only the Audubons can compete with Swifts optically, and I think Minox are built tougher and sealed better.
Also, if you do not mind individually focusing eyepieces, Fujinon Polaris (FMTR-SX) binoculars have absolutely stunning glass for the money. I've been trying to set up a comparison between Minox porros and Fujis, but not time yet. Fuji is my go to binocular though. ILya |
||
|
||
nksmfamjp
Optics Apprentice
Joined: January/06/2006 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 80 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: December/27/2006 at 08:45 |
|
|
I was wrong about the Discoverer series being discontinued. It appears that only the 7x42. I like that magnification for my use though.
Koshkin, Thank you for the detail info for telling the difference between the Minox HG and big three. Are the Minox porros also close, or closer to the list of good sub $400 glass that I posted.
Also, any others on the list of noteworthiness? It seems like the Swft's are the best performers optically, but the Discoverer may be better for hunting due to size, durability and waterproofness. How about the Pentax? |
||
|
||
koshkin
Optics Jedi Knight
Dark Lord of Optics Joined: June/15/2004 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 6306 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: December/26/2006 at 22:20 |
|
Yes it is very slight. In normal use I would not be able to see any difference. I can see the difference (very little of it) when looking at resolution charts and during night time observation with two strong off-zxis light sources in front of the binocular and behind me. ILya |
||
|
||
Roy Finn
Optics Master Extraordinaire
Steiner Junkie Joined: April/05/2004 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 3187 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: December/26/2006 at 22:16 |
|
|
Koshkin, what difference can be seen between the HG and the big 3? Is it slight?
|
||
|
||
koshkin
Optics Jedi Knight
Dark Lord of Optics Joined: June/15/2004 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 6306 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: December/26/2006 at 21:57 |
|
|
I do not know if Swift truly fixed the waterproofing issue, but I have not heard any complaints about the seals of currently manufactured (last year or so) Swift binos. Optically, 8.5x44 Audubons are spectacular. Their center field resolution is as good as any binocular out there at any price.
Now, if you want a top notch binocular you do not have to spend two grand. For the vast majority of us there is really no need to drop that much money, especially since good binoculars keep on appearing for less money. Minox has been impressing the heck out of me lately. Their HG series is superb for under a grand and most people will not see any difference between Minox HG and Zeiss/Leica/Swaro. I can see it, but only under pretty challenging conditions and only when I look for it. Minox porros are great as well. Nikon LXL binos are truly excellent as well and are, I think, in a similar price range with Minox HG. ILya |
||
|
||
Acenturian
Optics Journeyman
Joined: September/07/2004 Online Status: Offline Posts: 538 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: December/26/2006 at 20:52 |
|
|
The Bausch and Lomb Poro Discoverer is discontinued (awsome glass for the money) but as far as I know Bushnell still makes the Bushnell Discoverer 10x42 listed here on this sites store for $383.95. Also you may want to check this sites "Sample List" they have trade in's or demo models and the mark down is pretty good. Example I was looking really hard at the Kahles 10x42 list price here is $818.95 (which is still cheaper than anywhere else I found, one place had them listed at close to a $1,000) then I found some on the sample list at $599.95. Which in my opinion for high end glass made in Austria that is a heck of a buy.
Now I know that is more that you were looking at, my point is not to talk you into Kahles (although very very nice
Also, if Bushnell's roof prism Discoverer is anything like its predicessor the Bausch & Lomb Poro Discoverer they will be very nice binoculars that will serve you well.
AC
|
||
|
If You're In A Fair Fight, You Didn't Plan It Properly
- Anonymous |
||
|
||
nksmfamjp
Optics Apprentice
Joined: January/06/2006 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 80 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: December/26/2006 at 19:39 |
|
|
Thanks lucznik. I appreciate the response. I do truly use my binoculars about 1 week a yearr regularrly and then just every now and again checking on the deer on the way home from work. Maybe that is where I don't have the experience to know what I'm missing. I'm trying to educate myself because I want to see more deer before they see me. I haave been using binoculars like this for about 20 years. I was using about $50 binoculars for 1/2 of that time. Then I got some 10 x 50 Pentax porros about 10 years ago. They were an eye opener. They broke recently. Now I'm looking to replacee and maybe slightly upgrade.
I do realize the big three make a better product. For many these are probably a great deal for their uses. I was haveing trouble seeing a $1200 difference. I can clearly see the difference between $100 and $400. Now I've settled on this list of what can be found in my range and look good enough to me upon review. I have not been able to review either of the porro's, but I'm leaning towards roofs for their compactness.
Then I read that $400 roof are about like $150 porros. . .While, I would disagree, as far as I can tell. I do still agree that for the money porros usually represent the greater optical value while roofs have an advantage as far as handiness(nice bino term, huh?) and waterproofness.
So far, I have been most impresseed with the Bushnell Discoverers which I tried out. They just looked and felt like high dollar glass to me. That maybe a sign of my ignorance buying discontinued binos. Why were they discontinued? I usually find that related to models crossing over target audiences, but I see that Bushnell has left a hole in their product line from ~$400 - $1000 by eliminating the Discoverer. When compared to like pricee binos it seems to have a good specification. |
||
|
||
Post Reply
|
Page 123> |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |