![]() |
|
Vortex Optics |
Post Reply
|
Page 12> |
| Author | |
anweis
Optics Journeyman
Joined: January/29/2006 Online Status: Offline Posts: 708 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Topic: Vortex OpticsPosted: December/12/2006 at 11:18 |
|
I've looked through the $189 Broadwing 8x42. They were sharper than the Nikon Monarch ($300) but also had a very stiff focuser (two pairs tried). Also, a bit too much of flare, but it may not be a serious issue in the field.
|
|
|
|
RifleDude
Optics Jedi Master
God of Fire Joined: October/13/2006 Location: Texas Online Status: Offline Posts: 7696 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: December/12/2006 at 08:43 |
|
I can't comment on any of their other binos, but I can tell you the $700 Razor 8X42 is optically on par with anything I've seen short of the uber-priced glass.
|
|
|
Ted
You can tell a lot about a fellow's character by his way of eating jellybeans. -- Ronald Reagan |
|
|
|
skeeeter
Optics GrassHopper
Joined: November/19/2006 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 38 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: December/12/2006 at 04:07 |
|
We have a "birding store' here in town and I looked throught the Vortex line. The owner also had a pair of Zeiss 8x40 that I compared to the 8x42 Vortex (it was not the top of the line but medium priced example) as it was starting to get dark. To be honest and to my surprise I could not tell a difference between the two! Both were equally bright.
Maybe my eyesigth is going?
|
|
|
|
Bird Watcher
Optics Professional
Joined: August/30/2006 Location: Rocky Mt. High Online Status: Offline Posts: 858 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: December/05/2006 at 12:52 |
|
Thanks, my brain cells were obviously still back on page one with the Vortex Spitfires.
|
|
|
|
Tero
Optics Apprentice
Joined: December/04/2006 Online Status: Offline Posts: 135 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: December/05/2006 at 12:43 |
|
The 9x25s are reverse porros.
|
|
|
|
Bird Watcher
Optics Professional
Joined: August/30/2006 Location: Rocky Mt. High Online Status: Offline Posts: 858 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: December/05/2006 at 10:42 |
|
The optical system within the roof prism binoculars splits incoming light into two 'out of phase' paths. These two light paths are added together before they reach your eye, but the whole processs causes a deterioration in sharpness.(This is particularly noticable at high magnifications & small exit pupils). Phase correction coating dramatically improves resolution and contrast by correcting this light phase-shift.
Phase coating reduces internal glare and delivers enhanced contrast and high resolution in details. The results are extremely bright and crisp images, and true color fidelity. Roof prism binoculars without phase correction is a cost- cutting procedure that does not allow a binocular to achieve its maximum performance.
|
|
|
|
Tero
Optics Apprentice
Joined: December/04/2006 Online Status: Offline Posts: 135 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: December/05/2006 at 07:51 |
|
All my bonoculars are made in China. I replaced them with 9x25 Nikon ProStaff. No phase coating needed. I had the 10x25 ProStaff but they were too dim for me. |
|
|
|
Bird Watcher
Optics Professional
Joined: August/30/2006 Location: Rocky Mt. High Online Status: Offline Posts: 858 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: December/04/2006 at 22:21 |
|
Tero,
Not surprising/very inexpensive, Chinese 10x32 roof prism without phase correction. |
|
|
|
Tero
Optics Apprentice
Joined: December/04/2006 Online Status: Offline Posts: 135 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: December/04/2006 at 21:10 |
|
I was just searching old topics here. I had a pair of 10x30 Vortex Spitfire for a day. Sent them back, optics were poor, even for under $200. Suggest only trying the high end Vortex. Or at least not 10x at the cheap end. The 8.5X Spitfire sort of looked interesting, never saw it.
|
|
|
|
RifleDude
Optics Jedi Master
God of Fire Joined: October/13/2006 Location: Texas Online Status: Offline Posts: 7696 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: November/07/2006 at 09:01 |
|
Nope, not at all. I was simply replying to the original post. As I said, I have nothing whatsoever to gain from my comments, and my only connection to Vortex is email conversations I've had with one of their people. I work in an oil & gas equipment manufacturing plant in Texas. I'm just a guy who likes spending time in the outdoors and appreciates good outdoor equipment. I feel I got more for my money than I expected, was excited about that fact since it doesn't happen very often, and wanted to share my findings with others. I purchased these binoculars on blind faith and a couple good reviews, armed with the knowledge that the distributor would take them back if I wasn't satisfied with them. I think I have a good basis of comparison from which to evaluate the Razor, since I already own two other premium binos, one of which retails at twice the price of the Razor. I think they're definitely worth the money, and worth strong consideration if you're thinking of buying a high-end binocular. These are my opinions and my opinions only; I make no claim to be the final word on these binos. Feel free to disagree, but I'd invite you to look at them first. |
|
|
Ted
You can tell a lot about a fellow's character by his way of eating jellybeans. -- Ronald Reagan |
|
|
|
NDhunter
Optics Apprentice
Joined: September/15/2006 Online Status: Offline Posts: 101 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: November/06/2006 at 22:46 |
|
Rifledude. "You write like you work for, or are connected to Vortex."
|
|
|
|
Roy Finn
Optics Master Extraordinaire
Steiner Junkie Joined: April/05/2004 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 3187 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: November/06/2006 at 17:33 |
|
This is just a wild guess, but it sounds like you are happy with the Razor's.
Thank you very much for posting this and welcome. Good to have another aboard that knows what to look for. Personally, I thought the Trinovid was VERY good optically, but, I could not get past their weight. Yep, the Ultravid is a great bino, but for 1700 bucks it should be. Thanks again for the time you took.
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
Page 12> |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |