New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Sightron Big Sky vs. SIII
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Check GunBroker.com for SWFA's No Reserve and No Minimum bid firearm auctions.

Sightron Big Sky vs. SIII

 Post Reply Post Reply   Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: July/08/2011 at 18:45
FreeJersey View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice


Joined: February/21/2011
Location: NJ
Status: Offline
Points: 65
I am looking to upgrade my big sky 4-16 to a 6-24. How much better is the glass and overall construction of the SIII? I see it only focusses down to 50yds. How will the sight picture be at 25 yds? If it's not really useable at 25yds, I'll have to settle for the big sky.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: January/06/2012 at 10:07
kesi View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice
Avatar

Joined: July/23/2009
Location: Czech Republic
Status: Offline
Points: 72

Glass is the same, tube diameter S3 is 30 mm -> more light, I believe that at 25 yard at 6x magnification is not a problem focus.

(oops, I used the google translator).

If you are still interested in it. Big Grin
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: January/06/2012 at 14:21
jjrgr21 View Drop Down
Optics Journeyman
Optics Journeyman
Avatar

Joined: January/10/2011
Status: Offline
Points: 364
you don't get more light with a 30mm tube. you get more internal adjustment most of the time.

going to a bigger objective will gain light transmission
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: January/08/2012 at 10:02
kesi View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice
Avatar

Joined: July/23/2009
Location: Czech Republic
Status: Offline
Points: 72
Of course, the larger objective, more light, perhaps a better resolution, at the same quality glass. Smile
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: January/13/2012 at 12:21
dillon_h View Drop Down
TEAM SWFA - Staff
TEAM SWFA - Staff
Avatar
Woody

Joined: July/28/2011
Location: SWFA
Status: Offline
Points: 299
But... at the same glass quality, higher magnification + same glass coatings= less light transmission.
I have heard many great things about the SIII. What I like are the clicks. Clean, crisp and the few I have handled lined up hash to hash quite nicely. I took one outside and looked at a sign in the shadows at 10 yards and it was not as bad as I first thought. It was a bit fuzzy but, on 6x its not to bad, 25 yds was fine. clear and ready to shoot.  If you are needing more magnification, willing to give up the FOV and a little bit of eye relief I would say go for it.
 
Like jj said, the 30mm tube is going to give you no advantage to light transmission. The sole purpose of the larger tube is to give you more room for adjustments.
 
At optimum conditions the most light that your eye can take in at one time is 7mm.


Edited by dillon_h - January/13/2012 at 13:48
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: August/24/2013 at 22:21
krmcne View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper


Joined: April/05/2013
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 7
I believe the general formula I saw was to take the objective lens diameter, divide by the power, and you end up with the usable light coming through the scope. For example, using a 4x32 scope, take 32 and divide by 4 and you end up with 8mm. That's actually more light coming through than a young eye can use, since 7mm is the widest your young pupil will open. The older you get, the smaller your pupil will open, maybe down to 5 or even 4mm. Of course, I would assume that poor optics would also limit the light transmission, so the general formula may not be totally accurate. 
My experience with close focus is you just have to try it and see how close you can get. Specs may say 50 yds, but you may have no problem focusing closer on low power. I had one 16x target scope I got to focus at 50ft, although the side focus only went down to 50 yds.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: August/25/2013 at 09:33
338LAPUASLAP View Drop Down
Optics Master
Optics Master
Avatar
Scope Swapper

Joined: October/17/2009
Location: STATESIDE
Status: Offline
Points: 2455
Are you going to use the higher power is the question?

Why not look at the the 3-10?  If you don't need the higher magnification.

I own all the scopes in question.

For 25yrds that is an awful lot of magnification.
 
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Similar Threads: "Sightron Big Sky vs. SIII"
Subject Author Forum Replies Last Post
sightron big sky or SIII rooshooter Rifle Scopes 5
Sightron 1.25-5x20 SII Big Sky Riflescope army_eod Tactical Scopes 0 9/28/2007 8:18:41 AM
Sightron S2 Big Sky 1.25-5x20 koshkin Member's Tests and Reviews 7 10/11/2007 12:21:45 PM
Sightron Big Sky opinions Peteair Rifle Scopes 10 10/26/2007 10:21:14 AM
Sightron II Big Sky tahqua Rifle Scopes 15 2/7/2007 11:19:07 AM
Sightron Big Sky binoc5150 Rifle Scopes 0 3/11/2007 5:52:23 PM
Sightron Big Sky BobH Rifle Scopes 22 5/26/2007 1:51:22 PM
Sightron Big Sky Impressions Wally Rifle Scopes 23 6/14/2007 8:13:51 PM
Butler Creek covers for Sightron Big Sky greywolf Rifle Scopes 0 7/13/2007 7:48:29 PM
Sightron Big Sky series Peteair Rifle Scopes 1 9/19/2007 10:25:33 AM


This page was generated in 0.500 seconds.