Visit the SWFA.com site to check out our current specials. |
Side focus vs. M1A recoil |
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Author | |||
Exitwound
Optics GrassHopper Joined: February/15/2011 Status: Offline Points: 11 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: February/20/2011 at 07:26 |
||
I just read that sidefocus can sometimes get knocked around and somehow damaged by rifles with rough recoil. The M1A is notorious for being hard on scopes, as you not only have the force of the bullet's recoil on the rifle, but then you have a big ole op rod slamming forward to complete the cycle. I've read that many scopes aren't designed with the type of shock the M1A dishes out.
In a couple of days I'm dropping my M1A off at the gunsmith to have a Nikon Buckmaster 4.5-14x40 installed. It has the sidefocus feature. Am I correct in assuming this scope should be well built enough to handle the M1A? Thanks for your replies. Edited by Urimaginaryfrnd - February/20/2011 at 07:37 |
|||
Kickboxer
MODERATOR Moderator Joined: February/13/2008 Status: Offline Points: 23679 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
I agree with UIF... the Nikon is not a good choice for the M1A. The SS10xHD would be an outstanding choice. I have one on my 50BMG and it is holding up well. Everything about it is quality.
|
|||
Opinion,untempered by fact,is ignorance.
There are some who do not fear death... for they are more afraid of not really living |
|||
Exitwound
Optics GrassHopper Joined: February/15/2011 Status: Offline Points: 11 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
I already own a Smith Enterprises mount, and I made my own custom cheek riser from fiberglass that works perfectly- I don't recall asking about the mount or cheek weld. I'm not absolutely new to this game, I'm just trying to make the best decision in the $300 scope area.
|
|||
Kickboxer
MODERATOR Moderator Joined: February/13/2008 Status: Offline Points: 23679 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Exitwound, you asked the question, no one questioned your "history". The Nikon Buckmaster is a pretty good scope for a pretty good price... it is a hunting scope, not designed to sit on a tactical rifle like the M1A. It MIGHT work, but I wouldn't want to bet on it.
If you are limiting yourself to $300 for a scope for an M1A, I would recommend you stick with irons...
|
|||
Opinion,untempered by fact,is ignorance.
There are some who do not fear death... for they are more afraid of not really living |
|||
Urimaginaryfrnd
MODERATOR Resident Redneck Joined: June/20/2005 Location: Iowa Status: Offline Points: 14964 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Assumption if the mother of all fxxxups.
Edited by Urimaginaryfrnd - February/20/2011 at 12:44 |
|||
"Always do the right thing, just because it is the right thing to do". Bobby Paul Doherty Texas Ranger |
|||
Exitwound
Optics GrassHopper Joined: February/15/2011 Status: Offline Points: 11 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
I'm going to give it a go. There are guys on the M14 firing line forum with hundreds of rounds through theirs so far, and they haven't had a problem. That inspires confidence.
I figure this scope will buy me some time to save up for something sturdier, and in the mean time even if it breaks, there is that sweet Nikon warranty. |
|||
cheaptrick
MODERATOR Joined: September/27/2004 Location: South Carolina Status: Offline Points: 20844 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
I don't know.
I had a Buckmaster on a .300RUM once and it held up for many rounds on that rig. That M1A may blow it apart and then again..... Welcome to Optics Talk!
|
|||
koshkin
MODERATOR Dark Lord of Optics Joined: June/15/2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 13182 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Nikon Buckmaster is actually a pretty well built scope with a good reputation for durability. Now, all things mechanical can and do break occasionally, but I would not worry about it much.
That having been said, the 10x42 HD Super Sniper is built to a an altogether different (higher) standard both optically and mechanically. As far as side-focus scopes being more susceptible to recoil goes, that (like most old wives' tales) is not a good general statement. Properly put together side focus scopes are just as tough as scopes with any other means of parallax compensation. The emphasis here is on making sure it is a well-built scope from a quality maker. Just about any additional feature introduces extra moving parts, so if the maker does not take the necessary pre-cautions, bad things can happen. ILya
|
|||
Kickboxer
MODERATOR Moderator Joined: February/13/2008 Status: Offline Points: 23679 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
That's what makes OT so fun. I, personally, would never put a Buckmaster on an M1A... just not my idea of a "fit". I'm not knocking the Buckmaster, as I said it's a pretty good scope for a pretty good price, just don't think it is the right scope on that rifle. To each his own. All my "time" was with an unscoped M-14 so I have a slanted perspective, anyway.
|
|||
Opinion,untempered by fact,is ignorance.
There are some who do not fear death... for they are more afraid of not really living |
|||
koshkin
MODERATOR Dark Lord of Optics Joined: June/15/2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 13182 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Personally, I would not put a Buckmaster on M1A either. I can think of quite a few other scopes that make a better match configuration-wise. However, durability would not be a major concern for me. ILya
|
|||
Kickboxer
MODERATOR Moderator Joined: February/13/2008 Status: Offline Points: 23679 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
ILya, you and I agree on most points... HOWEVER... From a tester's perspective, I have go with the operational "suitability/surviveability" perspective. Straight out, given the rifle and ITS intended application, AND a situation where you ACTUALLY had to USE the M1a FOR its intended application, meaning that your and possibly others' rear ends are on the line... Nikon Buckmaster (any) or SuperSniper 3-9, 10xHD, 6x, or 1-4??????? Not a rhetorical question...Yes, of course, the Nikon is an option, just not nearly the best option and not the least likely to fail at the most inopportune time. Besides, it just doesn't look good sitting on an M1A... Edited by Kickboxer - February/20/2011 at 21:12 |
|||
Opinion,untempered by fact,is ignorance.
There are some who do not fear death... for they are more afraid of not really living |
|||
Urimaginaryfrnd
MODERATOR Resident Redneck Joined: June/20/2005 Location: Iowa Status: Offline Points: 14964 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
$2000 Battle Rifle $275 Smith Enterprise Mount ?$300 Buckmaster Scope Let me guess Wolf ammo.
|
|||
"Always do the right thing, just because it is the right thing to do". Bobby Paul Doherty Texas Ranger |
|||
Sparky
Optics Master Extraordinaire Joined: July/15/2007 Location: SD Status: Offline Points: 4569 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
|
|||
Exitwound
Optics GrassHopper Joined: February/15/2011 Status: Offline Points: 11 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Troll much? After getting a firsthand look at the buckmaster- it's not going on my M1A. I'm not sure why exactly they would round off the ends of the scope, but it makes it look really gay. I'm going to consider some other options at this point. I might just step up to a Monarch. |
|||
kennygss
Optics GrassHopper Joined: January/16/2011 Status: Offline Points: 28 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
I had an A.R.T. III on an M!A for years, served me well.
|
|||
SVT_Tactical
MODERATOR Chief Sackscratch Joined: December/17/2009 Location: NorthCackalacky Status: Offline Points: 31233 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
|
|||
Exitwound
Optics GrassHopper Joined: February/15/2011 Status: Offline Points: 11 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
And a valid train of thought... However the M1A is a battle rifle, and not exactly a precision piece of shooting equipment. I'm not going to be making 1,000 yard shots- ever. The most it'll ever see is 4-600 yards, and so even if I chose to shoot wolf ammo through it, I'm sure it would still easily hit a torso size target, which is the rifle's designed purpose.
I don't see why a lower end scope wouldn't fit the bill, as long as it is built reasonable well. There are plenty of $300 scopes out there that the M1A won't destroy. Why spend more in my situation? It makes no sense to me... Especially if it's something with a warranty like the Nikon. If it breaks, get it repaired and move it to another rifle, or sell it. |
|||
koshkin
MODERATOR Dark Lord of Optics Joined: June/15/2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 13182 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
I do not object to putting a $300 scope on this rifle. However, I would put a different $300 scope if it were up to me. One of these for example: or this ILya
|
|||
mike650
Optics God Joined: May/14/2006 Location: West of Rockies Status: Offline Points: 14569 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
There you go!!! EW, please post some pics when you've completed your M1A project. I haven't scoped mine yet, maybe someday. I have the "Scout" version and still enjoy using the iron sights. |
|||
“A hunt based only on trophies taken falls far short of what the ultimate goal should be.” – Fred Bear
|
|||
RocRat
Optics GrassHopper Joined: January/10/2011 Location: northeast Status: Offline Points: 9 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
When I had my M1a, I had aquired an older open top ARMS mount for it, and had a 10X Super Sniper on it. For the money, the SS is a great scope. What was the hardest on the scope was not the recoil but the ejected rounds hitting the windage knob. The M1a is long gone now, but the SS, now mounted on my Remington 700, still bears the scars.
|
|||
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |