New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Scope Power
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Check GunBroker.com for SWFA's No Reserve and No Minimum bid firearm auctions.

Scope Power

 Post Reply Post Reply   Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options Page  1 2>
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: October/16/2007 at 13:36
Graysteel View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice
Avatar

Joined: October/02/2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 200

I figure it is time to start the Holy wars!

My question is what do folks think is the highest useful power on a scope? Yes, I know that target folks often use very high power scopes and some tactical folks (Ok, I mean me) often say moderate is better, but my thought is this:

I have often said that my limit of accuracy is around 1/4 MOA as a shooter. From a resolving detail standpoint people are typically said to be able to resolve in the neighborhood of about 0.5 MOA unaided. So I need at least 2x for it even to be possible to see well enough to shoot my best. Being more practical, I would guess on needs about 3-5 times minimum resolution to be able to get good kinesthetic feedback. That puts us in the 6-10 power range. Erring on the high side (10) and granting that bench rest shooters with mechanical rests may be able to hold 1/8 MOA and therefore may get some useful benefit out of 20 to 24 power. But, I still wonder if there is any value in the 36X scopes. Thoughts?

My guess is that perhaps it is helpful for those with issues with eyesight or moderate quality glass, but I was wondering about other perspectives...





Edited by Graysteel
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: October/16/2007 at 14:43
cheaptrick View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar

Joined: September/27/2004
Location: South Carolina
Status: Offline
Points: 20474
Tagged.....
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: October/16/2007 at 15:22
Roy Finn View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar
Steiner Junkie

Joined: April/05/2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4856

You don't always need high magnification to shoot little groups. This was from a custom Husqvarna 06 with a Leupold 2.5-8x36 scope. 5 shots/100 yrds.

 

 

Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: October/16/2007 at 15:29
cheaptrick View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar

Joined: September/27/2004
Location: South Carolina
Status: Offline
Points: 20474

Excellent shooting, Roy!

Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: October/16/2007 at 15:42
Roy Finn View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar
Steiner Junkie

Joined: April/05/2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4856
Thank you sir.........
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: October/16/2007 at 16:31
Graysteel View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice
Avatar

Joined: October/02/2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 200

Someone has to disagree or have another opinion. :)



Edited by Graysteel
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: October/16/2007 at 16:34
Roy Finn View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar
Steiner Junkie

Joined: April/05/2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4856
So ya think I should hold off sending it back to Hart for a re-rebarrel.???
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: October/16/2007 at 16:49
Dale Clifford View Drop Down
Optics Jedi Knight
Optics Jedi Knight


Joined: July/04/2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 5087

My guess is that there are probably uncountable magazines articles dedicated to showing small groups attributed to lower ranges of power etc. however the variable you and the magazine have set is one of group size, not a combination of shooting factors. if DVC power, speed, and accuracy become the variables, (to say nothing of long range off hand silhoutte) the desirable power range takes a much larger jump. under time pressure the need to get any part of the reticle on the target favors magnifications in the higher range and is ironic that such events are usually not precision shooting, which is the area usually attributed to higher mag. optics. perhaps an approach such as what is the highest power I can still get on target in the fastest amount of time would be a more directed.



Edited by Dale Clifford
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: October/16/2007 at 17:09
RONK View Drop Down
Optics Master Extraordinaire
Optics Master Extraordinaire
Avatar

Joined: April/05/2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3199

Originally posted by Roy Finn Roy Finn wrote:

So ya think I should hold off sending it back to Hart for a re-rebarrel.???

 Well yeah, at least until you figger out where the other 4 shots went! 

Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: October/16/2007 at 17:15
helo18 View Drop Down
Optics Jedi Knight
Optics Jedi Knight
Avatar

Joined: December/02/2006
Location: Montana
Status: Offline
Points: 5431

Very interesting debate, but the problem is what you are using the scope for.  As stated, those that target shoot off a rest benefit from the higher magnification scopes.  I doubt out in the field for normal big game hunting anything over about 12x is going to do much good.  In the woods, I wouldn't go over 3 or 4x.  In heavy brush I really like using open sights.  If you say that the effective range for a hunter is normally about 300 yards, then you shouldn't really need anything over 6x, although the extra is nice to have.  As already shown, you can shoot a great group at 100 yds with low power scopes.  So why would you need a 24 or 36x scope for normal hunting, unless you want to hit the tick crawling through the vital area.  So IMHO, 9-12x is tops for big game.

 

Now, if you go to varmit hunting, then it could be benefitial to go up to 16-24x depending on the range.  I enjoy shooting at 1000yds with my 300 wm, and I have a 16x on there.  I don't think anything above that is necessary, and you can't hold it still with out a rest or bipod anyway.

 

So it comes down really to what you are going to use it for.  But I think a good all around scope for close to far shooting is a 3-12x or 4-16x.  Or something in that range.

Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: October/16/2007 at 17:17
RifleDude View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar

Joined: October/13/2006
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 14313

Originally posted by Roy Finn Roy Finn wrote:

So ya think I should hold off sending it back to Hart for a re-rebarrel.???

 

I would definitely forego the rebarrel idea there, Roy.  Just from the shape of the group, specifically that dreaded 4:00 flier, I can readily see the classic telltale sign of a cracked right locking lug!  Therefore, rather than spending another dime on that rifle, thereby further risking your safety, I highly suggest you box up that ticking time bomb and ship it to me instead! 

 

...Great shooting, bud!



Edited by RifleDude
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: October/16/2007 at 17:24
RifleDude View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar

Joined: October/13/2006
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 14313
WHOA!  Wait a minute there, Roy... I just noticed that you said that rifle wears a LEUPOLD 2.5-8X36 scope... but that can't be, as everyone here knows that you HATE Leupys, right?
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: October/16/2007 at 17:50
RifleDude View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar

Joined: October/13/2006
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 14313

Good topic, Graysteel!

 

As you and helo18 allude to, the highest useful magnification all depends on the shooting application and the rifle and shooter's grouping ability.  For a benchrest rifle and a shooter capable of 1/8 MOA, you almost can't have too much magnification and you want a fixed power scope anyway.

 

For a varmint rifle, you don't need as much magnification as a target rifle, but depending on the type of varminting, you could use magnification around 24X under certain circumstances.  For the type of varmint shooting I do (PDs), even for the longest shots, I've found that magnification much beyond about 15X is unnecessary because mirage becomes such a problem during most of the day that you can't resolve extreme detail well enough to use really high magnification anyway.

 

For a big game rifle, I believe more important than the consideration of where to draw the line on upper end magnification is making sure you don't have too much magnification on the low end (assuming a variable scope).  I personally think one should never go above 4X on the low end for close quarters shots or shots at moving game in order to have decent FOV.  That generally means 12X, 14X, or 16X on the upper end, but I personally think 16X is way too much magnification to be truly useful for most big game hunting.  To my way of thinking, I want no more than 3X on the low end and no more than 12X on the upper end.  My favorite scopes are 1.5-6X and 2-7X variables, and although I prefer the low powered variables for their compactness, I believe the best all around "hunt anywhere" magnification range is 2.5-10X.  That config has plenty of FOV on the low end and all the magnification you'll ever need for all but the most extreme shots on the high end.

Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: October/16/2007 at 17:50
Roy Finn View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar
Steiner Junkie

Joined: April/05/2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4856

I'll have to check that locking lug issue. That rifle used to wear the suspect Leupy and now wears a B&L 4000 2.5-10x40. I figured it was a bad scope that accounted for the erratic grouping.  I don't hate Leupold scopes, I just think that their pricing is a little out of wack.

 

Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: October/16/2007 at 18:05
RifleDude View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar

Joined: October/13/2006
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 14313
Really nice rifle, Roy!  Are those Buehler rings? 
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: October/16/2007 at 18:08
Roy Finn View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar
Steiner Junkie

Joined: April/05/2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4856
Yep, not alot of options for those Husqvarna's.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: October/16/2007 at 19:51
Graysteel View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice
Avatar

Joined: October/02/2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 200

It seems that most folks seem to agree the max useful is somewhere around 20X. There have to be a few benchrest folks out there that feel that 20-24  X is just way too low?
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: October/16/2007 at 20:56
Dale Clifford View Drop Down
Optics Jedi Knight
Optics Jedi Knight


Joined: July/04/2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 5087

I don't know ----- is bench rest really shooting ?????

 

NF 8x32

 

 

 

Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: October/16/2007 at 21:42
hot30 View Drop Down
Optics Journeyman
Optics Journeyman
Avatar

Joined: December/27/2006
Status: Offline
Points: 378

Nice one Dale.   Jammed on 32x, your target is a bullet hole, yes???  At 7 or 800yards

that is.?   Fine example of what scope power cuold be used for.

Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: October/16/2007 at 22:55
cletus85 View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper


Joined: December/29/2006
Status: Offline
Points: 42
I used to think a 3-9x40 was fine for about everything...now that I am a much more picky hunter and shooter, I like a little more power under certain circumstances.  If I'm shooting my .204 from the bench for groups I like 18x. For open country deer hunting, I can justify up to a 14x max, but usually comprimise with a 3-10x or something like that.  As has already been said, when hunting, target acquision is an important factor to consider too.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: October/17/2007 at 00:22
koshkin View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar
Dark Lord of Optics

Joined: June/15/2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 10966
I suspect most people here are better shots than I am, so I am not sure how relevant my take on this is to everyone else. 

That having been said:

I can shoot down to half MOA or so at reasonably close range (within 300 yards) and with a decent rest (or prone with a bipod, as I have recently learned).  Through some experimentation I found that when shooting at 100yards, I shoot just as well with a decent 2.5x scope as I do with a higher magnification scope.  As the range increases, I need a little more magnification, but not in direct proportion to distance.  I am just as mediocre at 700 yards (the longest at the range where I shoot) with a 6x scope as I am with an 18x scope.  For me, a crisp reticle, ability to see the target and the shape of the target seem to make more difference than pure magnification.  I do not need to resolve the bullet hole to shoot fairly small groups.  I do not even need to see the target all that well if it is symmetric.  For example, if I am shooting at a circle or a square, if I do not resolve the edges of it clearly, I can still have a consistent aiming point without thinking about it.  However, if I am shooting at something of irregular shape (we have animal silhouettes placed at different ranges), I need to see the shape fairly clearly in order to hit  the exact spot I want.

Now, keep in mind that I said "see clearly" rather than "higher magnification".   Good glass often lets me get away with comparatively modest magnification.  A 6x42 IOR lets me see the target more clearly than a 10x40 Elite 3200 or 10x42 Super Sniper, for example.  For a while, I was using a 3x25 IOR CQB scopes and I was very comfortable shooting out to 500 yards with it at targets of reasonable size. 

I am not a competitor, so I can;t comment on the needs of competitive shooters.  For the rest of us, I think high quality scopes of reasonably modest magnification are, IMO, the way to go for most shooting n the range and in the field. 

For varmint shooting, 16x is sufficient for most conditions, but since low end is not very important there, I see no harm in fielding a 6-24x or similar scope.

ILya
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: October/17/2007 at 00:52
helo18 View Drop Down
Optics Jedi Knight
Optics Jedi Knight
Avatar

Joined: December/02/2006
Location: Montana
Status: Offline
Points: 5431

From what I have seen on this forum, the people here know about optics, know about guns, reloading, and know how to shoot (and I am learning alot for all you guys, thanks for the good info).  In this case, higher magnification can help, unless, as mentioned earlier, it is a crappy scope.  Good glass makes a difference too.  It all adds up for the guys that do the research and the practice to get to this point.

 

Unfortunately, you can take the best gun, and the best scope, and it won't help the hunter that won't put the time into get better and learning.  If a guy can't hit the target with a low magnification, the higher magnifications won't help til you teach him how to shoot.  Plus if you need 16x or above to see big game, it is to far to shoot, at least for me.  I could hit an elk at 1000 yards, but will it be in the vitals?  Or does the bullet have the energy at that range?  I know that is ballistics, and I can tell you at that range, I would consider it iffy even with a 300 wm on animals that size.

 

The higher magnifications for the most part aren't going to make a better shooter, or that much more accurate.  Unless you are shooting competition, where a cm makes a difference, having anything about 16x isn't needed.  So for me, the higher magnification is nice, but not necessary.

 

My question is, Does the higher magnifications help, or does it allow people to shoot at ranges that they shouldn't be shooting at (past their capabilities, at least with hunting.  I don't care about target because it isn't animals that are getting away.)?

Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: October/17/2007 at 04:19
8shots View Drop Down
Optics Jedi Knight
Optics Jedi Knight
Avatar
Lord Of The Flies

Joined: March/14/2007
Location: South Africa
Status: Offline
Points: 5754

My money is all on the intended purpose of the scope. For hunting to distances out to 350 yds or so a 10x power is enough and allows a good trade-off between field of view, target aquisition and visibility of the aiming point. The size of the animal is also a deciding factor. The smaller the animal the more a 14X scope would look attractive.

 For target shooting I would say that the higher magnifications come into play.

I think Koshkin is correct that the shape, size and colour of the target also determines optimum power needed. If my target is a 1MOA black dot on a white paper I need less magnification then say on a black dot 5MOA in size. Or, as in the competitions I shoot in which is at a picture of an animal. I now use a 25 magnification and can pick up a subtle dark brown horizontal colouring, where it meets the white fleck on the shoulder...... get the point? or the aiming point!!! So in this case I can find an exact aiming point in stead of genereally on the shoulder etc.

I have never seen true benchrest shooting in person, but watched a dude on Youtube demonstrate some techniques. The guy lines up, lifts his head up and does not even look through the scope when he pulls the trigger.  As Dale says, this is not shooting, but an equipment race. I would say about a 250 power scope would look great on these rifles!!!

Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: October/17/2007 at 06:52
cyborg View Drop Down
Optics God
Optics God
Avatar
God of Wind

Joined: August/24/2007
Location: North Georgia
Status: Offline
Points: 12082

I would tend to agree with Koshkin, but I can see where there is need for the higher mags, but is the higher mag beneficial to you when the resolution may be lacking. (use the best glass you can get)

Personally I shoot just as good with 10x as I do with 20x, and I personally have no need for more than 20x.

If someone shoots better with higher magnification, more power to them. We each have our own preferences, and abilities.

 

Helo18, I'm pretty sure that 1000 yrds is past the ethical range for a 300 win mag for most game size animals.

I won't shoot past 650 for whitetail deer, most here I doubt would either, I like to hunt power line and gas, or sewer line easments.

I have a chart somewhere for energy at distances by bullet weight and velocity, I'll look for it. It shows the game animals ranges for calibres as well.  

 

I'm pretty sure for most people that are hunting, clarity, resolution, low light, and multi range use are more important, as higher mags also magnify even the smallest movement, and can cause you to take more time to acquire your aimpoint.

That's different for bench rest shooters. They have mechanical means to steady their rifles, not exactly a pure sport, it's more about who has the cash than who has the ability. Dale and 8shots are dead on the money there.   

Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: October/17/2007 at 07:51
Dale Clifford View Drop Down
Optics Jedi Knight
Optics Jedi Knight


Joined: July/04/2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 5087
Graysteel already gave the answer to his own post when he answered 8shots question in that post. Its a question of statistics. any hunting rifle will at one time deliver that target group the shooter carries in his wallet as a hood ornament, but competitors and high volume shooters (can include hunters, but usually doesn"t) that group must be shot 10 out of 10 times event after event. (and in some cases with time pressure). Unless the course of fire, do to movement, or shooting position will usually take advantage of mag. in the higher end. (movers and "special" set ups obviously take advantage of the lower ranges). Not to say that lower powers don't have utility, but there biggest advantage is not in mag, but in wt. savings as on a hunting rifle, which causes a bias in preference on that bases and not speed power and accuracy.
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  1 2>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Similar Threads: "Scope Power"
Subject Author Forum Replies Last Post
best scope &power tnyotehunter Rifle Scopes 4 7/12/2004 4:05:56 PM
scope power choice! tiger snake Rifle Scopes 6 8/5/2004 10:16:36 AM
Best Scope Power? Ron AKA Varmint Scopes 12
Scope power for a 25-06?? matrobw Rifle Scopes 20
Scope power Buster95 Rifle Scopes 11
Scope power choices... brodeur272 Rifle Scopes 3
scope power River Runner Spotting Scopes 0
Verify Scope Power / Magnification JRSanDiego Spotting Scopes 3
Change the power on a fixed power scope kaban56 Rifle Scopes 5
Fixed power vs Variable power scopes Roy Finn Rifle Scopes 39


This page was generated in 0.453 seconds.