New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Scope advice please for 300 wing mag
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Check GunBroker.com for SWFA's No Reserve and No Minimum bid firearm auctions.

Scope advice please for 300 wing mag

 Post Reply Post Reply   Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: August/04/2008 at 15:35
Tgrasshopper View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper


Joined: July/22/2008
Status: Offline
Points: 18
HI All,
 
I have a 300 wing mag Remington 700 LSS.
Right now I have a Leupold VXII 3-9X40mm silver with Leupold ring.
 
I'm thinking about switching that scope on my 17 HMR and gething a new scoppe for the 300 wing mag.
 
I'd like something that would be more bright in Dusk & dawn.
I'd like to stay with a Silver scoppe the color match the barell and the stock.
 
I was thinking about:
Leupold VXII 3.5-10X50mm(silver)
Zeiss 3-9X50 conquest(Silver)
 
any advice?
or bether scopp that I din't see in my recherche?
I heard Swarovski or awsome but coun't find any in silver......
 
Thanks
 
 
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: August/04/2008 at 17:48
supertool73 View Drop Down
Optics Jedi Master
Optics Jedi Master
Avatar
Superstool

Joined: January/03/2008
Location: Utah
Status: Offline
Points: 9531
Zeiss all the way out of those two.  Or if you want to keep your budget down and willing to go with black I would take a look at the Bushnell 4200 3-9x-40.  Glass nearly as good as the Zeiss conquest for a lot less money.  http://www.swfa.com/pc-7280-185-bushnell-3-9x40-elite-4200-rifle-scope.aspx
Those are great scopes, everyone on the forum that has one just loves it.  Easily the most popular scope on the site.  I would choose either one of those over the Leupold.


Edited by supertool73 - August/04/2008 at 17:50
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: August/04/2008 at 19:15
tahqua View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar
Have You Driven A Ford Lately?

Joined: March/27/2006
Location: Michigan, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 8047
I second Supertool. The 3-9x40 4200 will mount lower and is very bright. One of the best buys in scopes I've ever made......except the Nikon Monarch.
The Team Primos Nikon is also very good in the 3-9. It has the BDC that might be better for long range hunting.


Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: August/04/2008 at 20:12
TheDrakeTaker View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice
Avatar

Joined: July/21/2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 201
Forget the leupy, the conquest is easily better.  The 4200 is a better choice than the leupy but is either tied or just behind the conquest.  Can't go wrong w/ the 4200 or the conquest.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: August/04/2008 at 21:36
Tgrasshopper View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper


Joined: July/22/2008
Status: Offline
Points: 18
Black scoop on a LSS?
any one have a picture of a setup like that?
 
I din't know that the Elite 4200 was bether then leupold for light transmision I should a have read more about it back in the days...
 
This years Buchenell are making the Elite 4200 in 2.5-10 x 40mm.(SILVER)
Is it same quality ? 
 
 
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: August/04/2008 at 21:36
pyro6999 View Drop Down
Optics Retard
Optics Retard
Avatar
OT TITAN

Joined: December/22/2006
Location: North Dakota
Status: Offline
Points: 22024
Originally posted by TheDrakeTaker TheDrakeTaker wrote:

Forget the leupy, the conquest is easily better.  The 4200 is a better choice than the leupy but is either tied or just behind the conquest.  Can't go wrong w/ the 4200 or the conquest.
 
+1
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: August/04/2008 at 22:04
tahqua View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar
Have You Driven A Ford Lately?

Joined: March/27/2006
Location: Michigan, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 8047
[QUOTE=Tgrasshopper]Black scoop on a LSS?
any one have a picture of a setup like that?
 
/QUOTE]

I prefer the matte black.

Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: August/04/2008 at 22:12
martin3175 View Drop Down
Optics Master Extraordinaire
Optics Master Extraordinaire
Avatar

Joined: January/19/2005
Location: Maryland
Status: Offline
Points: 3773
You can get the 4200 in silver as you indicated and it is of the same quality as the 3x9---good choice
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: August/04/2008 at 22:40
Tgrasshopper View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper


Joined: July/22/2008
Status: Offline
Points: 18
@tahqua Look good!
but mine the stock is gray/black
 
Think I'll get the 4200 in silver and keep money for a spoting scopp.
 
I alwayse tought the buchenell was cheaper optical then leupold.....
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: August/04/2008 at 22:43
Tgrasshopper View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper


Joined: July/22/2008
Status: Offline
Points: 18
On that picture it's a 50mm?
Tought 40mm and 50mm fit the same ring....
On that picture the ring seem predy high
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: August/04/2008 at 22:43
supertool73 View Drop Down
Optics Jedi Master
Optics Jedi Master
Avatar
Superstool

Joined: January/03/2008
Location: Utah
Status: Offline
Points: 9531
Originally posted by Tgrasshopper Tgrasshopper wrote:

I alwayse tought the buchenell was cheaper optical then leupold.....


Lots of people have thought that because of the wonderful marketing campaign of Leupold.  But there are lots of other scopes out there that beat leupold in both glass quality and price.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: August/04/2008 at 23:07
mike650 View Drop Down
Optics God
Optics God
Avatar

Joined: May/14/2006
Location: West of Rockies
Status: Offline
Points: 12712
Originally posted by Tgrasshopper Tgrasshopper wrote:

HI All,
 
I have a 300 wing mag Remington 700 LSS.
Right now I have a Leupold VXII 3-9X40mm silver with Leupold ring.
 
I'm thinking about switching that scope on my 17 HMR and gething a new scoppe for the 300 wing mag.
 
I'd like something that would be more bright in Dusk & dawn.
I'd like to stay with a Silver scoppe the color match the barell and the stock.
 
I was thinking about:
Leupold VXII 3.5-10X50mm(silver)
Zeiss 3-9X50 conquest(Silver)
 
any advice?
or bether scopp that I din't see in my recherche?
I heard Swarovski or awsome but coun't find any in silver......
 
Thanks
 
 


I had a silver 50mm scope and sold it. It's just me but it seemed to be way too much silver sitting on top of my rifle while hunting.

I also had a silver 40mm on the same rifle, it was perfect and looked great. I finally replaced it last year with a matte 50mm scope and silver rings. It looks pretty good too.



Edited by mike650 - August/05/2008 at 00:24
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: August/05/2008 at 08:06
tahqua View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar
Have You Driven A Ford Lately?

Joined: March/27/2006
Location: Michigan, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 8047
Originally posted by Tgrasshopper Tgrasshopper wrote:

On that picture it's a 50mm?
Tought 40mm and 50mm fit the same ring....
On that picture the ring seem predy high


Those are high rings with a 3.5-10X50 Leo.
Thanks for the compliment.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: August/07/2008 at 08:00
Tgrasshopper View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper


Joined: July/22/2008
Status: Offline
Points: 18

I called a local shop and they told me the Elite 4200 2-10*50 is a verry good scopp and the price is good arond 420$ here in Canada.

But he told me this is not the right scoop for my 300 win mag the eyerelif is to low also with time if I end up with glass it will only be worst.

This guy in the local shop told me to go with the Leupold VXIII 3.5-10 *50
he told me 700$ for it and he seem to say that I can't go wrong with that they are robuste good optical good eye relief.

My questions is why you guy are teling me that the Zeiss conquest is way bether then the VXIII and why you guy's hate leupold that muth?

THanks
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: August/07/2008 at 09:16
3_tens View Drop Down
Optics Jedi Knight
Optics Jedi Knight
Avatar

Joined: January/08/2007
Location: Oklahoma
Status: Offline
Points: 7181
When a lie is repeated enough it is believed by many. This is advertising. Truth is expensive. Get your gun shop to let you look between a Leupold and Conquest outside and let you decide. Try reading print at a distance. I am very confident you will learn why so may say the Leupold is over advertised for its performance. As Walter Brennan used to say "No brag just fact."
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: August/07/2008 at 09:40
mercenary1947 View Drop Down
Optics Master
Optics Master
Avatar
**

Joined: April/02/2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1392
 I try to stay at a 42mm lens max .  Alot of guys gripe about looks of high mounts and see thru's and then  mount a 50mm or 50mm+ scope tight against the barrel which causes some heat radiating problems and looks like a spotlight on the objective end .... kind of gawdy to say the least . Go figger .... Whacko   Leupolds .... are overrated for the cost .... high markup for the seller .... that's why alot of shops push them .... and many people still believe the Leupold hype .   3-TENS is telling you like it is ...
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: August/07/2008 at 10:41
Tgrasshopper View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper


Joined: July/22/2008
Status: Offline
Points: 18

Yeah I din't ask him about the Conquest.
But I will.

The Conquest have predy muth same Eye Relief  as the Leupold.

Both scopp have the Tube size 1".
30mm would probably be bether but not realy worked for the ring price and difference in twlight.

The guy at the Shop told me to by the 50mm but I'm still not sure about that.
I used Hight ring in See thrue before and I hated it because the scoop mounth is to hight and I'm scared to instaled to hight ring, the lower the bether.

What I diffinitively want is and Improvement in the Optical in Duck & down compared to my VXII 3-9*40

and other compagnie that I looked at but might not have looked at enuf is burris.
Not sure if I should looked more closely at them are stay with the conquest.
I know the EuroDiamon is 30mm tube but that does not make the scoppe bether optical at 100%......

me is freaking confuseWhacko
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: August/07/2008 at 10:48
supertool73 View Drop Down
Optics Jedi Master
Optics Jedi Master
Avatar
Superstool

Joined: January/03/2008
Location: Utah
Status: Offline
Points: 9531
No a 30mm scope will not be brighter than a 1 inch tube all else being equal.  As far as a 50mm, if you are going with the 3-9x or 10x 40mm is just right.  No need to go any bigger for a scope in those power ranges. 

I would buy the Zeiss, it is just a flat out nicer scope than a Leupold VX3.  the 4inches of eye relief will be nice on your .300 as well.
Just on this baby and you won't be sorry, http://www.swfa.com/pc-1525-259-zeiss-3-9x40-conquest-rifle-scope.aspx


Edited by supertool73 - August/07/2008 at 10:49
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: August/07/2008 at 11:49
Gunshow75 View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice
Avatar

Joined: December/23/2004
Location: Kentucky, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 209
I have hunted whitetail in Saskatchewan for the past few years using a Conquest 3.5x10,44, and I have compared it with lots of Bushnell and Leupold scopes belonging to other hunters. I promise you that in low light, low contrast situations, the Conquest has always been superior.

One of my friends from the hunts, who shot a 300 Win Mag (Sauer) that had a VX-III, enticed me to sell him one of my Conquests because it's image was so much better than his Leupold.

I don't like the fact that Leupold's eye relief changes with magnification.

I think the Bushnell 4200 is a nice scope, but I think the Conquest is a bit better in low light.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: August/07/2008 at 12:53
Tgrasshopper View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper


Joined: July/22/2008
Status: Offline
Points: 18

I think I'll stick with the conquest  3.5-10*44
I think it will fit on the ring I already have.
 
http://www.millettsights.com/controller.php/catalog/turnin_style_rings_and_bases

I have to double check with one I have exactely I think it's the medium size.

What recticule I should be looking at in Zeiss?
I found Zeiss  web site is a bit confusing regarding recticule
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: August/07/2008 at 13:08
Gunshow75 View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice
Avatar

Joined: December/23/2004
Location: Kentucky, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 209
I use my rifles to hunt whitetails, and I like the #4 for that purpose.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: August/07/2008 at 13:22
JGRaider View Drop Down
Optics Master
Optics Master


Joined: February/06/2008
Status: Offline
Points: 1432

For hunting situations there is no need for a 50mm objective, or a 30mm tube.  They give you little or nothing that the 40mm and 1" tubes don't give you.   On that rifle I'd pick the Conquest and never look back. 

Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: August/07/2008 at 14:01
Tgrasshopper View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper


Joined: July/22/2008
Status: Offline
Points: 18

Thanks for all the help guys!

Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: August/07/2008 at 20:00
Tip69 View Drop Down
Optics Master Extraordinaire
Optics Master Extraordinaire
Avatar
Tip Stick

Joined: September/27/2005
Location: Nebraska
Status: Offline
Points: 3483
I'd go with the Conquest 3-9X40 and its 4" of eye relief!  Just put one on my son's 700 CDL and it's awesome!!
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Similar Threads: "Scope advice please for 300 wing mag"
Subject Author Forum Replies Last Post
Scope for Savage long range hunter 300 win mag Chem-man Shooting 5
Scope for hunting in Alaska **300 WIN MAG*** coloradohunter Rifle Scopes 28
300 win vs 300 win short mag........ bobaldoo Firearms 6
Scope Advice for long range 300 RUM muelrexp Tactical Scopes 36
Scope for 300 Win Mag murdam Rifle Scopes 10
High-end 300 win mag or 7 mag texashunter Firearms 19
Need scope advice for .300 Win Mag DurhamBiggDogg Rifle Scopes 17
Need Scope Advice for .338 Win Mag Elk Rifle Brazos_Jack Rifle Scopes 4
Scope fro 300 Wby Mag ? MoKirk Rifle Scopes 19 11/7/2006 5:45:15 PM
Rifle scope for 300 Ultra mag (help) tshuntin Rifle Scopes 5 12/27/2006 11:00:03 AM


This page was generated in 0.359 seconds.