Pyro

Why is 6.5 better than 6.8?

Edited by Chris Farris II - January/02/2009 at 16:07

 I thought you were on my side Cyborg?

how come chris farris is better than cf number 2???

Perhaps I should have held out for more money.

Older and Wiser he has a bigger number. (39 > 20.) (6.5 < 6.8) so how is 6.5 better?

Edited by Chris Farris II - January/02/2009 at 16:31

It slides down a smaller tube easier.

cyborg wrote: It slides down a smaller tube easier.

Kind of like pyro's .... Wait a minute wrong section of the forum to say that...

yeah number 2 thats for you man now get back to work!


Edited by pyro6999 - January/02/2009 at 17:04

Hey guy's Pyro already wanted to take is ball and go home once... he might really do it?

its ok james, #2 doesnt have anything better to do with his time, it fills a void in his life and makes him feel important to put me down, and thats fine. he knows who the boss is when i call swfa to place an order.

Pyro, for what it is worth, I also prefer 6.5 over 6.8.  My 6.5 Grendel is joy to shoot.

ILya

thanks ilya, i dare to be different  i guess

Pyro ...in all account's you are right ,it is a better caliber. some just don't want to believe it?
 and as you know I do shoot 270s/6.8 ....I hate to call it a 6.8.

 i dont mind talking about the 6.8spc or the .270wsm or .270wby but the .2_0win should be called the 6.8oconnor.

the only thing the 6.5's lack is a huge following by sportsmen in this country, thats it. look at the belted magnums, roy weatherby was the only one willing to take a chance on a .277 belted, remington and winchester didnt try it which was smart on there end. the 7mm is arguably the most popular belted magnum of all time, as far as number of people who own them.

I think you have influenced my decision to build a 6.5x284? thanks.

not a bad choice

                          Thank you!

I am writing all this sh*t down.....................