Swift vs. burris
Printed From: OpticsTalk by SWFA, Inc.
Category: Scopes
Forum Name: Rifle Scopes
Forum Description: Centerfire long gun scopes
URL: http://www.opticstalk.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=8251
Printed Date: March/29/2024 at 06:43 Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Swift vs. burris
Posted By: brandon327
Subject: Swift vs. burris
Date Posted: October/25/2007 at 23:00
Which one is a better scope? I am looking at swift 4-12x50 1 inch tube, 3-12x56 30mm tube, or a 3-9x50 30mm tube. In the burris i am looking at a fullfield II in 3.5-10x50. It will be going on a 300 SAUM.
|
Replies:
Posted By: cyborg
Date Posted: October/26/2007 at 11:03
HMMM That depends on the intended application, and your budget of course. Can you be more specific ?
------------- With Freedom comes great responsibility, you cannot have one without the other
An armed public are citizens. A disarmed public are subjects.
OATH KEEPER #8233 Support us, and join our cause.
Cyborg
|
Posted By: pyro6999
Date Posted: October/26/2007 at 16:52
the swift replacement policy is kick ass, and im not sure how they would hold up to a magnum, but i can see why it wouldnt, the burris isnt a bad choice either, i have one on my 300wsm, and havent had any issues with it, i would like to replace it with a zeiss conquest or a kahles kx though.
------------- They call me "Boots" 375H&H Mag: Yeah, it kills stuff "extra dead"
343 we will never forget
God Bless Chris Ledoux "good ride cowboy"
|
Posted By: brandon327
Date Posted: October/27/2007 at 00:17
Well just to say how the swift holds up I have 3 of them. I had the first one on 7mm rem mag for about 5 years and no problems. Then i put it on a mzzeloader. I have one currently on a 280 handi rifle and on a 300 saum. I am thinking about replacing the one on the 300 saum and out the one on it on my new 444 marlin handi rifle. I would realy like to spend $200 - $300. but at least less than $400 though. This scope will be sighted in for 300 yards on the 300 SAUM.
|
Posted By: pyro6999
Date Posted: October/27/2007 at 07:52
bushnell elite 4200 or nikon monarch for that kind of money if you went the full $400 you could get a zeiss conquest, of course it would only be 3x9 but the first two i mentioned you could probably get something closer to the powers you wanted for the amount you want to spend.
------------- They call me "Boots" 375H&H Mag: Yeah, it kills stuff "extra dead"
343 we will never forget
God Bless Chris Ledoux "good ride cowboy"
|
Posted By: helo18
Date Posted: October/27/2007 at 17:20
I have a couple burris scopes and really like them. I would suggest going with the sig select in the burris, but that will run closer to $400. The fullfied IIs are decent for the price though.
------------- To be prepared for War is one of the most effectual means of preserving peace.
GEORGE WASHINGTON
|
Posted By: BobH
Date Posted: October/27/2007 at 20:09
I don't have a ton of experience, but I have a Fullfield II and am very happy with it. I only have 3 scopes, but here is what I have noticed. It is definitely better than the Bushnell I have (head and shoulders) but to my untrained eye, it is not significantly behind the Zeiss Diavari I have.
|
Posted By: pyro6999
Date Posted: October/27/2007 at 21:34
wow, my new buckmaster is a lot brighter than my 5 yr old fullfieldII but thats just me, i think you would find that in the right situations the diavari would be a clear winner in any contest between a ffII.they just arent comparable
------------- They call me "Boots" 375H&H Mag: Yeah, it kills stuff "extra dead"
343 we will never forget
God Bless Chris Ledoux "good ride cowboy"
|
Posted By: cyborg
Date Posted: October/29/2007 at 09:33
Guys Pyro is on the money here. The conquest is a solid buy, next would be the 4200 elite.
------------- With Freedom comes great responsibility, you cannot have one without the other
An armed public are citizens. A disarmed public are subjects.
OATH KEEPER #8233 Support us, and join our cause.
Cyborg
|
|