Print Page | Close Window

Kahles CL or Kahles C for Low Light

Printed From: OpticsTalk by SWFA, Inc.
Category: Scopes
Forum Name: Rifle Scopes
Forum Description: Centerfire long gun scopes
URL: http://www.opticstalk.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=5729
Printed Date: March/28/2024 at 07:40
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Kahles CL or Kahles C for Low Light
Posted By: tarboroheel1
Subject: Kahles CL or Kahles C for Low Light
Date Posted: February/06/2007 at 20:38
I am looking at both scopes. The Kahles CL I am looking at is the 3-10x50, the Lahles C I am looking at is 3-12x56 30mm tube. I live in North Carolina. Scope is for Whitetails. We can hunt 30 minutes before and 30 minutes after. What do you guys suggest so that I can examine a rack under those conditions. I want to spend the least amount possible, but get a quality scope. Scope is going on a 300WSM. I will somtimes have a shot well over 300 yards. I have been looking at the Conquest line as well. Any suggestions? Any models? Any brands. I just mentioned two that have come recommended. I just don't know if I really need a 30mm tube and 56mm objective. I have just invested in a Nikon Monarch for another rifle, the 3.5-10x50 model. I may want something a little better.



Replies:
Posted By: jonbravado
Date Posted: February/07/2007 at 08:11

look at the 3-12x56 for the best lowlight performance. kahles C.

you shouldn't need sidefocus on the CL.

 

if you want great performance in line w/ the C/CL scopes, try the 3-12x56 (30mm tube) meostar from meopta.

get a #4 reticle and enjoy the view. it's an awesome scope for under 700 bucks. IMO as bright as the kahles.

 

good luck. and happy hunting.

 

J



Posted By: pntfrmr
Date Posted: November/18/2012 at 14:01
I have the 3 x 12 x 56 c in 30 mm it is the best low light scope i have ever looked thru 30 minutes after sun set won't be a problem with it.


Posted By: 338LAPUASLAP
Date Posted: November/18/2012 at 14:15
C X 56 !!!

-------------
No one


Posted By: ccoker
Date Posted: November/18/2012 at 20:42
I just got done hunting since Friday with the C 3-12x56 with the Mil 2 reticle.
Outstanding scope!
The reticle seems a bit fine and I was worried I would have a hard time picking it up in very low light.
Not the case if it was at 6x or above
Being a FFP it gets small on low power..


I hunted several years with a CL 3-10x50 #4
I would say the 56mm gets you a few moments more shooting time.

I like the mil reticle and FFP personally.

Danged good scope..

When I got home there was a box from Meopta for review.
One of the items was a Meopro 3-12x56.
Will be doing some back to back testing at low to no light.
My house backs up to an empty field so I can test optics from the back porch out to 250 yards to the tree line.




-------------
www.TacticalGunReview.com

Pro Staff - Silencer Shop

http://tacticalgunreview.com



Posted By: MeoptaSurujh
Date Posted: November/20/2012 at 03:13
Originally posted by ccoker ccoker wrote:

I just got done hunting since Friday with the C 3-12x56 with the Mil 2 reticle.
Outstanding scope!
The reticle seems a bit fine and I was worried I would have a hard time picking it up in very low light.
Not the case if it was at 6x or above
Being a FFP it gets small on low power..


I hunted several years with a CL 3-10x50 #4
I would say the 56mm gets you a few moments more shooting time.

I like the mil reticle and FFP personally.

Danged good scope..

When I got home there was a box from Meopta for review.
One of the items was a Meopro 3-12x56.
Will be doing some back to back testing at low to no light.
My house backs up to an empty field so I can test optics from the back porch out to 250 yards to the tree line.


 
Just to clarify "One of the items was a Meopro 3-12x56."... that configuration actually does not exist from Meopta.
If it was a MeoPro (1 inch tube), then it would have to be either a 3-9x42, 4-12x50 or 6-18x50.
The only 3-12x56 model made is in the MeoStar (30mm tube) line.
 


-------------
Yes I work for Meopta, but I am not here to sell Meopta. Just answering questions and providing reasonable insight.


Posted By: ccoker
Date Posted: November/20/2012 at 06:33
You are right..
Sorry about that.
The branding seems backwards to me..

BTW
I tested the Meostar and Meopro 4-12x50 last night.
The latter is the deal of the season for a great low light hunting scope!


-------------
www.TacticalGunReview.com

Pro Staff - Silencer Shop

http://tacticalgunreview.com




Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2018 Web Wiz Ltd. - https://www.webwiz.net