Print Page | Close Window

3200

Printed From: OpticsTalk by SWFA, Inc.
Category: Scopes
Forum Name: Rifle Scopes
Forum Description: Centerfire long gun scopes
URL: http://www.opticstalk.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=5325
Printed Date: March/28/2024 at 04:36
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: 3200
Posted By: brasskeeper
Subject: 3200
Date Posted: January/05/2007 at 21:55
Well I did it, I ordered a Bushnell 3200 3x9x40. It was hard to decide between the buckmaster, 3200 or fullfeild 2. I hope I made a good decision.



Replies:
Posted By: Anthony
Date Posted: January/05/2007 at 22:05
The fullfeild 2 and buckmaster are definitely better, but we are talking different price range. IMO any one of those three is a good deal for the money.


Posted By: miket_81
Date Posted: January/06/2007 at 00:23
I would disagree I have had experience with all 3 and would take the 3200 everytime. You can't beat the 3200 for $164 IMHO. You made a great choice and will be very happy with your new scope. Let us know how you like it!


Posted By: Dolphin
Date Posted: January/08/2007 at 06:48
I agree, I like the 3200, or at least find it to be the equal.  Fine choice, you will not be disappointed.

-------------
D. Overton


Posted By: pyro6999
Date Posted: January/08/2007 at 07:55

i dont know if i am a weird-o or what, but when i look through a ff2 and a buckmaster the ff2 looks brighter and clearer to me than the 3200 and the buckmaster i own 3 buckmasters and one ff2 and the ff2 does look clearer, but my one buckmaster has killed more deer than all my other scopes combined and its been on every rifle i own, to me the 3200 and the buckmaster are a dead heat, so as long as the 3200 holds up over time and holds its zero i cant argue with your choice!



-------------
They call me "Boots"
375H&H Mag: Yeah, it kills stuff "extra dead"

343 we will never forget

God Bless Chris Ledoux
"good ride cowboy"


Posted By: horsesandhorns
Date Posted: January/08/2007 at 11:40
I've had both the 3200 and buckmaster scopes. I personally did not like the 3200 at all. I have owned a Bushnell Trophy that was better in low light conditions than the 3200. The buckmaster line of scopes are good scopes for the money. Too bad you could have gotten a Nikon Monarch 3-9x40 for $203.95 right here at SWFA.


Posted By: pyro6999
Date Posted: January/08/2007 at 11:41
i have a monarch 3x9x40 i just put it on my new 6.5 rem mag its sweet

-------------
They call me "Boots"
375H&H Mag: Yeah, it kills stuff "extra dead"

343 we will never forget

God Bless Chris Ledoux
"good ride cowboy"


Posted By: brasskeeper
Date Posted: January/08/2007 at 17:25

Originally posted by horsesandhorns horsesandhorns wrote:

I've had both the 3200 and buckmaster scopes. I personally did not like the 3200 at all. I have owned a Bushnell Trophy that was better in low light conditions than the 3200. The buckmaster line of scopes are good scopes for the money. Too bad you could have gotten a Nikon Monarch 3-9x40 for $203.95 right here at SWFA.

 

 

What does the UCC mean on the Monarch? Why are these Monarchs cheaper than most places charge for a Buckmaster?



Posted By: Anthony
Date Posted: January/08/2007 at 17:30

UCC means ultra clear coat.

 

monarchs are currently on sale at SWFA, but I don't know for how long.



Posted By: cheaptrick
Date Posted: January/08/2007 at 17:36
http://www.opticstalk.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=5349&PN=1&FID=1&PR=3 - http://www.opticstalk.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=5349&PN=1& amp;FID=1&PR=3

-------------
If at first you don't secede...try..try again.


Posted By: martin3175
Date Posted: August/20/2007 at 14:07
3200 is a great value--You should have no worries on your purchase



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2018 Web Wiz Ltd. - https://www.webwiz.net