Print Page | Close Window

which of these wins in low light?

Printed From: OpticsTalk by SWFA, Inc.
Category: Scopes
Forum Name: Rifle Scopes
Forum Description: Centerfire long gun scopes
URL: http://www.opticstalk.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=11090
Printed Date: March/18/2024 at 23:47
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: which of these wins in low light?
Posted By: rooshooter
Subject: which of these wins in low light?
Date Posted: May/03/2008 at 08:35
trying to decide between the S1 3.5-10-50, the S11 3-9-42 or the nikon omega 3-9-40 for low light work? please consider...



Replies:
Posted By: cheaptrick
Date Posted: May/03/2008 at 10:53
Never seen them side by side, but I'm fairly sure the S2 would be the better performer.
 
The Omega is pretty good. I would compare it to a Nikon Buckmaster, optically speaking.
 
The S1 really never impressed me much.  


-------------
If at first you don't secede...try..try again.


Posted By: lucytuma
Date Posted: May/03/2008 at 13:19

I agree with Cheap, SII has the best glass and a 42mm objective.



-------------
"The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not." - Thomas Jefferson


Posted By: koshkin
Date Posted: May/03/2008 at 15:42
SII is the best one of these three.

ILya


Posted By: rooshooter
Date Posted: May/04/2008 at 03:09
cheers all!


Posted By: grumpy04730
Date Posted: May/04/2008 at 10:01
Sightron SII would win hands down Just bought a big sky 3.5x10x50 and can't belive how bright it is in low ligjt as good as my conquest of the same size



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2018 Web Wiz Ltd. - https://www.webwiz.net