New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Not sure that was fair and unbiased
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Check GunBroker.com for SWFA's No Reserve and No Minimum bid firearm auctions.

Topic ClosedNot sure that was fair and unbiased

 Post Reply Post Reply   Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options Page  1 2>
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June/21/2010 at 07:28
scooter65 View Drop Down
Optics Master Extraordinaire
Optics Master Extraordinaire
Avatar

Joined: December/29/2006
Location: mi
Status: Offline
Points: 3567
I know we're all entitled to our opinions.  But some were rather strong.  Not sure all were being unbiased on this and it's a shame we can't agree.  We will just have to revisit the issue again in the future and see if a positive consensus can be reached.  Not all of us can keep up but don't hold youth against anybody. 
 
Just my two cents
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June/21/2010 at 07:40
lucytuma View Drop Down
Optics Jedi Knight
Optics Jedi Knight
Avatar

Joined: November/25/2007
Location: Wisconsin
Status: Offline
Points: 5389
The decision has been made and even though we may not all agree, we have to concede to the rules put before us.
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June/21/2010 at 08:00
budperm View Drop Down
Optics Retard
Optics Retard
Avatar
show me your sheep!!

Joined: January/01/2009
Location: Pennsylvania
Status: Offline
Points: 27625
Well I'm not happy with the outcome but the majority clearly showed there desire!
Youthful exuberance shouldn't be held against anyone!!! No No  I am ashamed of us!
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June/21/2010 at 09:06
mike650 View Drop Down
Optics God
Optics God
Avatar

Joined: May/14/2006
Location: West of Rockies
Status: Offline
Points: 12709

Direct Link To This Post Posted: June/21/2010 at 09:22
BeltFed View Drop Down
Optics God
Optics God
Avatar

Joined: February/12/2008
Location: Ky
Status: Offline
Points: 16067
I don't think it will stand very long. Remember, youth and skill will always be overcome by age and treachory.Nut Kicker
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June/21/2010 at 09:25
300S&W View Drop Down
Optics God
Optics God
Avatar

Joined: January/27/2008
Location: Burlington,WV
Status: Offline
Points: 10592
Originally posted by lucytuma lucytuma wrote:

The decision has been made and even though we may not all agree, we have to concede to the rules put before us.
 
  It pains me but I agree.
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June/21/2010 at 09:44
budperm View Drop Down
Optics Retard
Optics Retard
Avatar
show me your sheep!!

Joined: January/01/2009
Location: Pennsylvania
Status: Offline
Points: 27625
Dang, Mike thats down right cold!!!
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June/21/2010 at 09:52
300S&W View Drop Down
Optics God
Optics God
Avatar

Joined: January/27/2008
Location: Burlington,WV
Status: Offline
Points: 10592
 +1
 
  Not much to say guys.
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June/21/2010 at 10:05
Steelbenz View Drop Down
Optics Master Extraordinaire
Optics Master Extraordinaire
Avatar
ROLL TIDE ROLL

Joined: January/03/2006
Location: Heart of Dixie
Status: Offline
Points: 4902
Look, why are we airing this in public? Just slap the crap outta'em an go on.
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June/21/2010 at 10:08
300S&W View Drop Down
Optics God
Optics God
Avatar

Joined: January/27/2008
Location: Burlington,WV
Status: Offline
Points: 10592
 I didn't think it should be discussed in public either but.........................................
 
 
 Anyways,I'll post no more here.
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June/21/2010 at 10:21
3_tens View Drop Down
Optics Jedi Knight
Optics Jedi Knight
Avatar

Joined: January/08/2007
Location: Oklahoma
Status: Offline
Points: 7180
Rules are rules. When the rules have to be made covering issues that should be morally understood its bad. Honesty should never have to be a rule. If it has to be brought out to public venue then that be it. You have to be up front with what the rules are. It's just not clear if all the rules are clear.
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June/21/2010 at 10:27
Chris Farris II View Drop Down
TEAM SWFA - Staff
TEAM SWFA - Staff
Avatar
MODERATOR

Joined: August/13/2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3063
I know the said agreements for "him" may not be everyones opinion. Unfortunately we have to do it this way. It is either we all agree or wait until we do. Kind of like a Jury. It stinks but that is just how it is fellas. Til later...
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June/21/2010 at 10:30
RifleDude View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar

Joined: October/13/2006
Location: Texas
Status: Online
Points: 14313
Guys, why do we have to keep rehashing this and continue pouring salt on old wounds?  The membership spoke.  Let it be. 
 
We don't all have to like one another, but we do have to get along.  Remember, all of you were new members at one time or another, and in each case, it took us awhile to get to know you.  I would expect each of you to extend the same courtesy to others.
 
Now, can we finally put this behind us... PLEASE?
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June/21/2010 at 10:35
Cope6.5/284 View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice
Avatar

Joined: February/22/2008
Status: Offline
Points: 115
It can be put in the past, but even after the 90 days I HIGHLY DOUBT my valued opinion of the kid you all so highly codone will change without some higher well being miracle being presented upon us.
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June/21/2010 at 10:42
BeltFed View Drop Down
Optics God
Optics God
Avatar

Joined: February/12/2008
Location: Ky
Status: Offline
Points: 16067
Originally posted by Chris Farris II Chris Farris II wrote:

I know the said agreements for "him" may not be everyones opinion. Unfortunately we have to do it this way. It is either we all agree or wait until we do. Kind of like a Jury. It stinks but that is just how it is fellas. Til later...
Well then you may as well drop him, cause I'm NOT changing my mind.
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June/21/2010 at 10:49
RifleDude View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar

Joined: October/13/2006
Location: Texas
Status: Online
Points: 14313
Yeah, but Lynn, I think what you were basing your objections on were a bit petty.  After a little soul-searching, wouldn't you agree?  The other 15 guys had similar objections, but were willing to set aside their personal feelings and base their decision on the rules we set long ago.  Rules are rules.
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June/21/2010 at 10:54
Cope6.5/284 View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice
Avatar

Joined: February/22/2008
Status: Offline
Points: 115
Lynn I know we both hate controversy, but irregardless of the outcome you yourself come to, I can not and will not change my mind. I hope that you to stand your ground also. Outcome stands as is!
 
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June/21/2010 at 10:56
BoDaggitt View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice
Avatar

Joined: October/31/2008
Status: Offline
Points: 129
What a bunch of whining girls.  Let it go, we don't want him.
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June/21/2010 at 11:00
Chris Farris II View Drop Down
TEAM SWFA - Staff
TEAM SWFA - Staff
Avatar
MODERATOR

Joined: August/13/2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3063
So you are saying the greater majority over 90% that agree are the whining girls? I would in fact say that it may be the 10% that disagree with the presented topic are the " whining girls" so to speak. The only one who went about the disagreement respectfully out of the 10% or less was Lynn, and even calling that respectful could be questioned by some. You Bo and Jim (Cope6.5/284) were probably the least respectful. That itself is what surprised me the most. Til later...
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June/21/2010 at 11:00
BeltFed View Drop Down
Optics God
Optics God
Avatar

Joined: February/12/2008
Location: Ky
Status: Offline
Points: 16067
Originally posted by RifleDude RifleDude wrote:

Yeah, but Lynn, I think what you were basing your objections on were a bit petty.  After a little soul-searching, wouldn't you agree?  The other 15 guys had similar objections, but were willing to set aside their personal feelings and base their decision on the rules we set long ago.  Rules are rules.
They may be petty to some and may be overlooked by a few, but it is not petty to me, and I see it as a flaw in character that WILL come back and bite us in the butt. Rules are rules and those are the rules.
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June/21/2010 at 11:01
Kickboxer View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar
Moderator

Joined: February/13/2008
Status: Offline
Points: 18337
No one said it had to be unanimous...
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June/21/2010 at 11:04
BeltFed View Drop Down
Optics God
Optics God
Avatar

Joined: February/12/2008
Location: Ky
Status: Offline
Points: 16067
See! It's not just me.
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June/21/2010 at 11:08
BeltFed View Drop Down
Optics God
Optics God
Avatar

Joined: February/12/2008
Location: Ky
Status: Offline
Points: 16067
Originally posted by Kickboxer Kickboxer wrote:

No one said it had to be unanimous...
I beg to differ. Refer to Rule 3C section 5. paragraph 3 line 4. It was adopted 2-11-09.
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June/21/2010 at 11:10
Average Joe View Drop Down
Optics Master
Optics Master
Avatar

Joined: April/24/2008
Status: Offline
Points: 2178
I'm so out of this loop...........
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June/21/2010 at 11:18
Kickboxer View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar
Moderator

Joined: February/13/2008
Status: Offline
Points: 18337
Unanimity is only required if under the "quorum".
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  1 2>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Similar Threads: "Not sure that was fair and unbiased"
Subject Author Forum Replies Last Post
Not sure if should go with medium or high mounts nickorette Rings and bases 4
Not my best, not my worst. helo18 The Range Report 7
Unbiased Opinion please 44magsue Handgun Scopes 4
Unbiased opinion AVhunter Member's Tests and Reviews 1
One thing is for sure Corndawg Rifle Scopes 0
Would this be a fair trade? slowr1der Rifle Scopes 3
Scopes: not too big, not too small, just right koshkin Rifle Scopes 23
Fair price for Zeiss Diavari ORhunter Rifle Scopes 6 3/5/2007 4:57:20 PM
Fair price? Sneaky Rifle Scopes 5 3/23/2006 6:01:15 PM
VX III fair price? biggjohn Rifle Scopes 1 8/13/2006 9:06:49 PM


This page was generated in 0.359 seconds.