Visit the SWFA.com site to check out our current specials. |
Nitrogen vs Argon filled? |
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Author | |
1911man
Optics Apprentice Joined: May/17/2009 Location: NW AR Status: Offline Points: 165 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: May/19/2009 at 08:50 |
Any real advantages to Argon or is this just marketing hype?
|
|
Bill Wilson
www.wilsoncombat.com |
|
Dale Clifford
Optics Jedi Knight Joined: July/04/2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 5087 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
depends on the purity of the source, advertisements leads consumer to believe either would be put in scope in pure form, more than likely some commerical grade from a local source would be used. Physically argon is heavier than nitrogen so in theory at least would require more energy to accomplish the same per mole ratio of diffusion.
|
|
3_tens
Optics Jedi Master Joined: January/08/2007 Location: Oklahoma Status: Offline Points: 7853 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Argon is a Noble gas and is stable. It will not bond with other elements like oxygen. (oxidize) Argon will not be a causing factor for corrosion.
|
|
Folks ain't got a sense of humor no more. They don't laugh they just get sore.
Need to follow the rules. Just hard to determine which set of rules to follow Now the rules have changed again. |
|
Dale Clifford
Optics Jedi Knight Joined: July/04/2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 5087 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
the activation energy necessary to get nitrogen to bond to oxygen in a scope will never happen. If this were a viable alternative , we would all be dead due to the high concentrations of nitrogen and oxygen in the atmosphere. |
|
silver
Optics Master Joined: November/04/2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 2291 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Put enough voltage on it and it makes pretty colors. Most of the differance is on paper. I have not priced these gases. My guess is that somebody is getting a good deal on Argon. LN is damn cold to handle and there may be safety issues that improve with argon. As long as the gas is clear and inert you should be fine.
|
|
"If we weren't all crazy we, We would go insane." Jimmie Buffet
WWW.formitch.com |
|
Dale Clifford
Optics Jedi Knight Joined: July/04/2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 5087 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
argon is side product from the manufacture of oxygen and nitrogen, which is going to be made anyway, so its cost while more than N2 is much lower than other noble gases, neon, krypton etc. |
|
8shots
Optics Jedi Knight Lord Of The Flies Joined: March/14/2007 Location: South Africa Status: Offline Points: 6253 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
And Kryptonite will cause the bullet to drop at your feet! |
|
3_tens
Optics Jedi Master Joined: January/08/2007 Location: Oklahoma Status: Offline Points: 7853 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Nitrogen and Oxygen will bond at ambient temps when water is present forming nitrates. No high temp is needed. I was not talking explosive oxygenation but corrosive oxygenation when moisture is introduced. Also Not all Nitrogen generation plants produce Argon as a side gas, nor do they need extreme temperatures. They can be relatively small package units.
8's does this mean that if a Kahles or Leupold scope is used the bullets drop at your feet since they are filled or partially filled with Krypton gas???
|
|
Folks ain't got a sense of humor no more. They don't laugh they just get sore.
Need to follow the rules. Just hard to determine which set of rules to follow Now the rules have changed again. |
|
Sandracer
Optics Apprentice Joined: January/11/2009 Location: Eastern Oregon Status: Offline Points: 141 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Yes!
|
|
Kickboxer
MODERATOR Moderator Joined: February/13/2008 Status: Offline Points: 23679 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Argon is inert, Nitrogen just doesn't bond with anything very well. Argon has more resistance to extreme rapid temperature changes and over the LONG haul will allow no - extremely little moisture vs extremely little - very little. Argon is cheaper to separate than krypton, but relatively the same in performance, for this case. Generally, if krypton is "added" to the mix, it is because it separated as a byproduct and was just "there".
Argon/krypton rather than nitrogen is used in some of the systems I test due to the fact that it is not subject to very rapid temperature changes.
|
|
Opinion,untempered by fact,is ignorance.
There are some who do not fear death... for they are more afraid of not really living |
|
koshkin
MODERATOR Dark Lord of Optics Joined: June/15/2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 13181 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
In practical terms, you will not see any difference between Argon Purged and Nitrogen purged scopes.
It does make for some very important sounding advertisement, but that is largely it. While atomic argon is appreciably more inert than atomic nitrogen, that is thoroughly unimportant. Gaseous nitrogen is a diatomic molecule, while argon is mono-atomic. N2 molecule is almost as heavy as a single argon atom and is much larger in physical size. Cost-wise, while nitrogen is appreciably cheaper, neither should have any noticeable effect on scope price. ILya |
|
8shots
Optics Jedi Knight Lord Of The Flies Joined: March/14/2007 Location: South Africa Status: Offline Points: 6253 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I am afraid so. It is clearly stated in the handbook for kryptonite!
|
|
Kickboxer
MODERATOR Moderator Joined: February/13/2008 Status: Offline Points: 23679 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
What ILya said was that you are probably not going to launch any scopes which will experience very high velocities and therefore potential rapid extreme temperature changes negating any utility to argon/krypton purging over nitrogen purging, which is absolutely correct.
|
|
Opinion,untempered by fact,is ignorance.
There are some who do not fear death... for they are more afraid of not really living |
|
Al Nyhus
Optics Apprentice Joined: March/08/2009 Status: Offline Points: 127 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
The whole mystique of scopes being filled with argon, nitrogen, helium, unobtanium, etc. is something that always brings a smile to my face.
The reality is that as long as the scopes is assembled in a minimum humidity environment, just plain old room atmosphere does as good a job as any 'trick' fill. The scopes are filled something when they're assembled at the plant, but just exactly how long do you think that lasts? A quick look at a scopes construction will tell you.... it's not long.
I use several scopes that have long since tooted their atmosphere out and all still perform w/o fogging....in temps from -10 to 100+ and humidity ranges from 30 to over 90 percent.
Makes for good marketing, though. Edited by Al Nyhus - May/20/2009 at 16:08 |
|
"Marsupials scare me".
|
|
Kickboxer
MODERATOR Moderator Joined: February/13/2008 Status: Offline Points: 23679 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Al, do you only hunt in broad daylight, not bothering with the "temperature transition" times?
I have, in fact, experienced fogging due to temperature change, even with "purged" optics and have seen the utility, under proper conditions of moisture, of Rainguard treated (not addressed here, really, but just thought I would throw it in for fun) lenses. There is also a decrease in corrosion of internal parts (at least those not made of plastic) in purged scopes (however, that is only a problem over LONG periods of time...generally). They all have a use. The big point is the differential between argon/krypton purged scopes vs nitrogen purged. For most common usages, there is no utility to noble gases over nitrogen, other than perhaps an extended period of corrosion protection. That all assumes that seals remain intact and the gas remains in the scope body. However, seepage can be corrected. There are places which will "repurge" a depleted scope and refurbish seals. Is it a marketing device... of course it is. Is it, in fact, useful... depends. I only have a couple of scopes I've kept long enough for it to be an issue. In one, there is a noticeable degradation of visual quality with a tendency for fogging in fairly rapid temperature change conditions, and I KNOW it has leaked. The other appears to be maintaining integrity and is as clear and unaffected by the external atmosphere as I can expect. I may actually try to get it checked and repurged/resealed at some time.
Of course, I know people who have hunted for many years with one scope and never experienced fogging, as you have not. That does, however, not mean others have not experienced the converse.
|
|
Opinion,untempered by fact,is ignorance.
There are some who do not fear death... for they are more afraid of not really living |
|
3_tens
Optics Jedi Master Joined: January/08/2007 Location: Oklahoma Status: Offline Points: 7853 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Argon and Krypton have much higher specific gravity so would give a much faster and more complete purge when floating the contaminants out of the scope. That makes them a better,very stable, gas to use.
|
|
Folks ain't got a sense of humor no more. They don't laugh they just get sore.
Need to follow the rules. Just hard to determine which set of rules to follow Now the rules have changed again. |
|
Al Nyhus
Optics Apprentice Joined: March/08/2009 Status: Offline Points: 127 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
'Mornin'.
Not sure what you mean about "broad daylight" hunting? I just go when it's time to go. As to "temperature transition" times, I take a similarly simple approach to it by not considering it at all. I do make a concession with my Winter predator rifles by not bringing them into a really warm area after hunting in cold weather....more for condensation on the rest of the gun that any optical considerations, though.
I'm not poo-pooing scopes being purged at the factory. But as long as some sort of dry atmosphere is introduced, I'm not convinced it makes any difference what it is. And the 'purged state' of a scope is not a forever thing. Seals leak due to age, we move the occular in and out on threads that are certainly not air tight (despite whatever sealing method is used), we move objective lenses with similar threads or via a side mounted turret (with seals) there's expansion/contraction due to heat and cold, etc.
As long as we don't have some sort of massive sealing issue, these things just keep on working for the most part.
Good shootin'. -Al
|
|
"Marsupials scare me".
|
|
rifle looney
Optics Master Joined: November/21/2008 Status: Offline Points: 2553 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I have a pair of bino's that I dropped and cracked the housing surely they leaked what ever they were purged with, and I have seen no faults as of yet and they have been in temps from 13 degrees up to the high 60's on one hunting trip? snow and rain.
|
|
Ed Connelly
Optics Retard God of no Chihuahua Joined: December/16/2007 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 24225 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
This makes me feel good all over about hunting with a forty year old Weaver scope.........
|
|
huff143
Optics Journeyman Joined: December/08/2008 Location: Kansas City Status: Offline Points: 304 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
How does the actual molecular mass differ between argon and nitrogen? Surely if a scope is properly sealed to hold one it will hold the other. But, are argon molecules larger than nitrogen?
|
|
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |