New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - nikon primos or 4200 3x9x40
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Check GunBroker.com for SWFA's No Reserve and No Minimum bid firearm auctions.

nikon primos or 4200 3x9x40

 Post Reply Post Reply   Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: March/23/2010 at 08:46
cowski View Drop Down
Optics Journeyman
Optics Journeyman
Avatar

Joined: November/19/2009
Location: alabama
Status: Offline
Points: 305
which of these scopes is the best in low light ?image quality?
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: March/23/2010 at 09:06
tahqua View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar
Have You Driven A Ford Lately?

Joined: March/27/2006
Location: Michigan, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 8044
They are both good in low light. It is the reticles that make the biggest difference between the two scopes. I like the 4200 reticle better in those conditions.
You can get a plex with the 3-9 Monarch UCC. Mine works well for low light and heavy cover.

Doug
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: March/23/2010 at 13:59
Xlr8n View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper


Joined: January/26/2010
Status: Offline
Points: 24
They both have an advetised 95% light transmission. Image quality should be very similar.
Rainguard is a plus on the Bushy.
The BDC reticle is either a plus or a minus on the Nikon depending on your preference.
Both can be found close to the same price and both get you a free jacket. (well I guess you have to pay $15 shipping on the busnell offer)
 
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: March/23/2010 at 17:44
lucytuma View Drop Down
Optics Jedi Knight
Optics Jedi Knight
Avatar

Joined: November/25/2007
Location: Wisconsin
Status: Offline
Points: 5389
I like the bushnell better for the rain guard and duplex reticle, if you can live with the bdc the nikon is a very nice scope.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: March/24/2010 at 23:38
cowski View Drop Down
Optics Journeyman
Optics Journeyman
Avatar

Joined: November/19/2009
Location: alabama
Status: Offline
Points: 305
i was hoping for a few more opinions .
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: March/25/2010 at 04:25
cheaptrick View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar

Joined: September/27/2004
Location: South Carolina
Status: Offline
Points: 20471
Originally posted by cowski cowski wrote:

i was hoping for a few more opinions .
 
Try a search.
These two scopes have gone head to head for years. LOTS of threads related to these two.
 
 
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: March/25/2010 at 12:40
Xlr8n View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper


Joined: January/26/2010
Status: Offline
Points: 24
If you want an opinion, here's mine: I'd go for the Nikon.
Aside from the Elite 4200/6500 which do indeed possess very good optics, the rest of their lineup is underwhelming and they offer some low-end models that are simply junk. Same in their binoc lineup. Lots of bubble-pac discount store crap.
Everything in Nikon's lineup is known to be decent quality with no garbage. To me that tells me something about the company I'm buying products from. Just my take.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: March/25/2010 at 13:07
3_tens View Drop Down
Optics Jedi Knight
Optics Jedi Knight
Avatar

Joined: January/08/2007
Location: Oklahoma
Status: Offline
Points: 7180
Looking at the 2 scopes you mentioned the 4200 has far superior image quality compared to the Primos to my eyes. The reputation of the hit and miss CS of Nikon will push  the choice to the 4200 as well. Both are good scopes for their price range. Good luck
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: March/29/2010 at 10:30
cowski View Drop Down
Optics Journeyman
Optics Journeyman
Avatar

Joined: November/19/2009
Location: alabama
Status: Offline
Points: 305
thanks 310's are 4200's clearer than monarchs? i own a monarch but have only looked through 4200's in the store.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: March/29/2010 at 18:51
jjake View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper


Joined: November/30/2005
Status: Offline
Points: 28
My 2 cents. I have both; purchased from SWFA. Of the two, I would purchase another 4200 3-9x40. I do not like the BDC on the Primos it is too thick and useless unless you are willing to take the time to learn how to use it. I hunt out to 200yrds, a BDC is not necessary for my application. I do not think it is as clear or as quick to bring to my eye as the 4200. I got caught up in the "it's a Monarch" hype. I mounted the 4200 on a Savage 243 and have been very pleased.
If I had it to do over again I might try a Vortex Viper or Conquest; although they both are getting a lot of press as well (maybe deserved, maybe not). I have not seen one in person.  Read these sites long enough and you will find the answer you want to find to justify your purchase, I did. My usual is a Leupold 3.5-10x50 VXIII which I think is an outstanding scope but I'm a sucker for peer pressure and read too much...study long, study wrong.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: April/02/2010 at 16:30
brilite View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper


Joined: October/29/2009
Location: Virginia
Status: Offline
Points: 31
I like my Primos Monarch.  Great scope!  Good Nikon support, not as good as Leupold but good.  Why don't you call  both companys and see how the support and service is.  If that is important to you.
Good luck,
Brian
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: April/02/2010 at 17:35
Alan Robertson View Drop Down
Optics Master
Optics Master
Avatar

Joined: October/31/2009
Location: Oklahoma
Status: Offline
Points: 1722
I've not seen the (older model) Team Primos, but did a recent side- side comparison of a Monarch and a 4200 and found the Bushnell to be optically superior- to my eyes, at least- the 4200 was clearer.
The Nikon's BDC reticle might have a slight advantage in low light, since the little circles should appear as a thicker reticle.
ymmv
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: April/02/2010 at 17:49
martin3175 View Drop Down
Optics Master Extraordinaire
Optics Master Extraordinaire
Avatar

Joined: January/19/2005
Location: Maryland
Status: Offline
Points: 3773
Have both .
Horrible Nikon Customer service when a 3 day old Monarch stopped tracking ..have several 4200's on hard kickers like 300 RUM , 300 WBY's,338 win Mag and 45/70's and no issues ever. Optically they are similar, but the 4200's have proven rugged and have Rainguard to boot ...4200 is the way to go !!
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: April/03/2010 at 16:36
270XBolt View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice
Avatar

Joined: March/30/2010
Status: Offline
Points: 57
I have both and think they its pretty much a toss up.  I find the Monarch to have better eye relief and the optics seem to be pretty close.  Never had to use Nikon CS but did take Bushnell up on their "no questions asked" warranty on an Elite 3200 one time.  Took about 3 weeks but it truly was a no questions asked deal.
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Similar Threads: "nikon primos or 4200 3x9x40"
Subject Author Forum Replies Last Post
Tactical Turret Retrofit for Elite 4200 3x9x40? donlipa Rifle Scopes 8
4200 Elite 3X9X40 DISCONTINUED? DAVE44 Rifle Scopes 1 5/21/2007 6:58:35 PM
Bushnell 4200 3x9x40 Focus Rifle Scopes 2 8/26/2007 8:52:26 AM
4200 3x9x40 captain14 Rifle Scopes 23 10/4/2007 8:51:14 PM
4200 3x9x40 199.99 @ competator skeetlee Rifle Scopes 36
4200 Elite 3-9x40 or Nikon Team Primos 3-9x40 dunagan15 Rifle Scopes 20
4200 or primos #2 skeetlee Rifle Scopes 12
4200 vs Team Primos Cbissell07 Rifle Scopes 14
Bushnell 4200 vs Nikon Primos sledge437 Rifle Scopes 9
Nikon Primos or Bushnell 4200 Elite rrrahm Target 10


This page was generated in 0.406 seconds.