New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Nikon IRT or Monarch
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Check for SWFA's No Reserve and No Minimum bid firearm auctions.

Nikon IRT or Monarch

 Post Reply Post Reply   Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: September/29/2009 at 11:02
wildbill79 View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper

Joined: September/29/2009
Status: Offline
Points: 1
My wife bought me a Savage 116FCSS in 300 win mag for my birthday.  I know, I am so lucky.  Anyways, I am leaning towards Nikon because I like their scopes and they have good value for money.  I have looked through Leupold's and Swarovski's and its not worth the money to me for the better optics.  I guess I am not very observant, but its hard for me to tell the difference. So I have 2 scopes that I am looking at 3-12 X 42SF Monarch #8420 and the Nikon IRT #8477.  The difference is really that the IRT incorporates the rangefinder into the scope.  I love this feature.  I can leave my rangefinder at home.  Also it doesn't need rings, just mounts flat to a base.  I guess I like it because I can imagine it being very quick to target and fire, while eliminating alot of movement while juggling rangefinders and rifles.

Shooting Steps w/out IRT.
1) Locate Target.
2) Use rangefinder to target yardage.
3) Hope target doesn't move while setting up rifle.
4) Set up rifle, possible re-range again, fire.

Shooting with IRT
1) Locate Target
2) Range, Fire

So does anyone have either scope on a similar rifle?  Is it worth the money over a regular Monarch?  Does it handle recoil?

Thanks in advance to all the replies.  I have enjoyed reading/ lurking on this forum for a while.

Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: September/30/2009 at 20:16
danjojoUSMC View Drop Down
Optics Journeyman
Optics Journeyman

Joined: August/20/2009
Location: NE Ohio
Status: Offline
Points: 329

No Nikon IRT....3 inches of eye relief for a 300 Win Mag doesn't sound good...looks ugly...will not be as parallax adjustment for actually taking the 400-600 yard shots with the BDC reticle.

Its better to just get the 3-12 Monarch if you like the BDC reticle.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: September/30/2009 at 22:01
Kickboxer View Drop Down

Joined: February/13/2008
Status: Offline
Points: 19661
I have the Nikon IRT on a Remington 700 Etronx in 220 Swift.  I've had no parallax problems whatsoever.  Eye relief is better than 3inches for me.  I've also had it on 7mmMag and 30-06 with no problems.  Only shot it out to 500yds... with the Etronx, consistently under 1/2 MOA.  The Monarch won't provide you any better than that.  Only got a few hundred rounds on it using the various rifles, but it is holding up well so far.  One range day, I swapped it back and forth between the 30-06 and the 220, fired 78 rounds of -06 and 100 rounds of .220 Swift.  I like it...
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Similar Threads: "Nikon IRT or Monarch"
Subject Author Forum Replies Last Post
There are no similar posts.
Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.10
Copyright ©2001-2017 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.215 seconds.