New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Monarch X vs Zeiss Conquest
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Check GunBroker.com for SWFA's No Reserve and No Minimum bid firearm auctions.

Monarch X vs Zeiss Conquest

 Post Reply Post Reply   Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: December/15/2007 at 13:05
chasw View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper


Joined: December/03/2007
Location: Seattle USA
Status: Offline
Points: 7
Hello:  I have several service rifles in .30-06 caliber and I'm thinking about upgrading to a higher grade riflescope.  Two models in the same price range catch my eye:
1. Nikon Monarch-X 4-16X50 with mildot and target knobs
2. Zeiss Conquest 4.5-14X50, also with mildot and target knobs

The Nikon has a 30mm tube, but Zeiss has the reputation for superior glass, esp that final polish.  It's difficult for me hereabouts to see them side by side.  Is anybody in a position to compare them on optical resolving power and quality of W&E mechanism?  thx - CW
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: December/15/2007 at 19:28
Focus View Drop Down
Optics Master
Optics Master
Avatar
Conquistador!!

Joined: June/05/2007
Location: Maine
Status: Offline
Points: 1006
Well I don't see you getting any answers so I will say I have the conquest scope and find it bright and resolute. The side focus works excellent and the tracking and holding POI are faultless. I'm very pleased with the scope and would not hesitate to recommend it. I own several conquests and they are all good scopes. If you have problems zeiss provides great service and warranty but it can take some weeks if it has to go to the factory in New York. I have no experience with the nikon so I can not comment on it at all.

Focus

   Focus
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: December/16/2007 at 04:46
cheaptrick View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar

Joined: September/27/2004
Location: South Carolina
Status: Offline
Points: 20479
The Monarch X, from what I've read, is a renamed Nikon Tactical. I haven't seen the "X", but if it's anything like the old NiTac, then it's a very nice scope.
 
But, as Focus will tell you, so is the Conquest.
 
This review of the NiTac may be a little dated, but Dave B. is good to go.
 
For having a 30mm tube, the lack of "up" on this scope is one thing that bugs a lot of people. Me included.
 
 
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Similar Threads: "Monarch X vs Zeiss Conquest"
Subject Author Forum Replies Last Post
Nikon Monarch UCC or Zeiss Conquest eddy k Rifle Scopes 3 12/2/2006 10:25:13 AM
monarch or fullfield II or conquest .243 ruger Rifle Scopes 10 12/15/2006 4:51:26 PM
monarch vs 4200 vs conquest kicker Rifle Scopes 3 1/30/2007 12:17:47 AM
VX-III or MONARCH or CONQUEST upcreek2 Rifle Scopes 13 2/28/2006 10:56:30 PM
Monarch vs. Conquest DAVE44 Rifle Scopes 11 4/24/2007 2:01:53 PM
Zeiss Conquest 4.5-14X50 miket_81 Rifle Scopes 6 4/11/2007 10:19:38 PM
Zeiss Conquest 3-12x56 CWPINST Rifle Scopes 28 6/20/2007 2:12:34 PM
Zeiss Conquest question new vs old newmanuim Rifle Scopes 1 6/14/2007 11:19:22 AM
Big Nasty vs. Zeiss Conquest Rancid Coolaid Rifle Scopes 31 6/21/2007 6:08:08 PM
KAHLES AMERICAN VS. ZEISS CONQUEST DAVE44 Rifle Scopes 11 3/1/2007 2:20:02 PM


This page was generated in 0.359 seconds.