OpticsTalk by SWFA, Inc. Homepage SWFA     SampleList.com
Forum Home Forum Home > Other Optics > Binoculars
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - minox hg 8x33-nikon premier lx 10x32
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Visit the SWFA.com site to check out our current specials.

minox hg 8x33-nikon premier lx 10x32

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
jinksellis View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper
Avatar

Joined: March/05/2007
Status: Offline
Points: 1
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote jinksellis Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: minox hg 8x33-nikon premier lx 10x32
    Posted: March/05/2007 at 10:47

 I would like your opinion  on these 2 binoculars for hunting.I can get

both for about $600.00.The nikons are the lx and not the new lxl and they are

show samples but are stated as new in the box.The minox are new binoculars.

Of these two which would you reccommed.

Thanks.

Back to Top
FrankD View Drop Down
Optics Journeyman
Optics Journeyman


Joined: November/11/2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 686
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote FrankD Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March/05/2007 at 11:20

If I had to choose based on what I know of both bins and with strong consideration given to the choice of configurations then I would opt for the Monox HG. In terms of optical quality the Nikon probably has a slight edge however I strongly prefer/would suggest the 8x32 over the 10x32 configuration of almost any bin. My reasoning is fairly simple. The larger exit pupil of the 8x32s should provide a more relaxed image overall. Throw in the fact that an 8x bin is also generally easier to hold steady. Lastly, most hunters tend to put alot of emphasis on low-light capability for obvious reasons. In my experience the 8x32 should yield better low light capability in comparison to the 10x32.

 

I would also feel somewhat compelled to mention the issue of weight. I am unsure of the weight of the Minox HGs but I seem to remember it was in the low 20 ounce range IIRC. The original Nikon HG/Premier/Venturer 32 mm was closer to 27 or 28 ounces again IIRC.

 

Just my take on it.

Frank
Back to Top
thinkingman View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice


Joined: January/13/2006
Status: Offline
Points: 93
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote thinkingman Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March/05/2007 at 12:15

I have held both in my hands and the Nikon felt better, good ergonomics, and easier to focus.

I just had an easy time with the Nikons.

Actually better than the Kahles that I currently own.

 

Back to Top
ahuebel View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice


Joined: December/28/2006
Status: Offline
Points: 109
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ahuebel Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March/05/2007 at 14:30
I've throroughly examined (in the field) the minox HG 10x43 and 8.5x52 and the 10x43's were a little too light for my taste. I don't like carrying around a brick, but I like the stability a little weight adds. Also the magnification is completely a presonal preference characteristic. I prefer the 10x even for low light. Once you start getting into the high-end binoculars the difference is so minimal it's hardly noticable if at all. Optically the minox HG are incredible but I do not like the fact that they do not come with objective lens covers. You can find some and purchase separately but keeping them covered and clean is important to me.
Back to Top
Tero View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice
Avatar

Joined: December/04/2006
Status: Offline
Points: 135
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Tero Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March/05/2007 at 19:50
The Nikons might the one 10x32 to look at. I have not liked other brands in the 10x32 and 10x30 range, especially as the cheaper 10x42s actually weigh very little, just over 20 ounces. More expensive 10x42s do get heavy. They have more metal. I have a 10x40 that weighs more than my nice light 10x42 Monarchs, no metal I believe in the barrels.

I would like to see the 10x32 Nikons some time, just to compare to what I am used to.


Edited by Tero
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.01
Copyright ©2001-2018 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.133 seconds.