New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Low range variable scopes-new vs old
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Check GunBroker.com for SWFA's No Reserve and No Minimum bid firearm auctions.

Low range variable scopes-new vs old

 Post Reply Post Reply   Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: February/16/2008 at 07:00
300S&W View Drop Down
Optics God
Optics God
Avatar

Joined: January/27/2008
Location: Burlington,WV
Status: Offline
Points: 10592
                   Is the difference in image brightness THAT much better in the new 20mm vs older 20mm scopes? I know that the larger the objective ,the more light is let in,but how much larger would you have to go to see a big difference? Also I recently read that the european scopes use larger ocular lenses for better low light conditions? One more question. Can I use my three pair of LEVIS as trade-ins on a new scope? LET THE GAMES BEGIN!!!
 
                                                          til later
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: February/16/2008 at 09:13
silver View Drop Down
Optics Master
Optics Master


Joined: November/04/2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2291
The coating, grinding and prisms are all better now.  The glass is "cleaner."  Its not "Just" the objective size that matters.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: February/16/2008 at 09:15
Focus View Drop Down
Optics Master
Optics Master
Avatar
Conquistador!!

Joined: June/05/2007
Location: Maine
Status: Offline
Points: 1006
Originally posted by silver silver wrote:

The coating, grinding and prisms are all better now. The glass is "cleaner." Its not "Just" the objective size that matters.


That about covers the difference....

   Focus
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: February/16/2008 at 10:14
300S&W View Drop Down
Optics God
Optics God
Avatar

Joined: January/27/2008
Location: Burlington,WV
Status: Offline
Points: 10592
                           I' m sure there's been BIG advances in lense qualities over the years but,taking into consideration equal lense qualities,which of these scopes for example would offer a brighter low light image (1.75-5x20 Leupold or 1.75-5x32 Burris Sig. Safari)and(1.75-6x32 Leupold or 1.5-6 Burris Sig. Select). APPRECIATING the help!
 
                                                       til later
 
P.S. Wife says I have ta keep the jeans so this is a cash deal!
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: February/16/2008 at 10:57
RifleDude View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar

Joined: October/13/2006
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 14313

300, the ocular (eyepiece) diameter has nothing to do with amount of light transmission through the scope.  Ocular diameter affects field of view and eye relief.  The objective diameter does directly affect light transmission, but beyond a certain point, your eye cannot see the difference as objective diameter continues getting larger.  At about 7mm exit pupil, the scope is transmitting all the light the human eye can use.  So, since exit pupil is calculated by dividing objective dia (mm) by magnification, a 56mm objective is transmitting all the light your eye can use at 8X, a 42mm objective at 6X, 28mm objective at 4X, etc.

This is before lens and coatings quality and type is factored in, as they both affect light transmission as well.  Concerning coatings, the type of multicoating used has an effect on low light performance as well.  Coatings that optimize light transmission in the blue light spectrum will have better low light performance as well, all else being equal.
 
So, assuming the lens and coating quality of the scopes you compared were exactly equal, the one with the larger objective lens diameter would have a little better low light performance at the same magnifications.  Again, this basically holds true until exit pupil reaches 7mm, at which point continually increasing objective diameter doesn't offer an advantage the typical human eye can discern.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: February/16/2008 at 11:08
Ed Connelly View Drop Down
Optics Retard
Optics Retard
Avatar
God of no Chihuahua

Joined: December/16/2007
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 24220
(......and all Levi's must have rivets ground off and replaced with barbed wire fasteners. Carhartt coats and Woolrich coats with snaps have also been tearing up too many saddles and panniers, so grind all them off, too!) Shocked    --Ed ( but Pyro started all this nonsense!)
 
[ We do not even want to get into what them Danner boots and those White boots are doin' with all them EYEHOOKS!!!.....That will be another thread!]
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: February/16/2008 at 13:42
Focus View Drop Down
Optics Master
Optics Master
Avatar
Conquistador!!

Joined: June/05/2007
Location: Maine
Status: Offline
Points: 1006
Its good to see all but Ed are one the same track.......Ed hasn't got past the levi thing yet.........:>)

   Focus
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: February/16/2008 at 13:52
pyro6999 View Drop Down
Optics Retard
Optics Retard
Avatar
OT TITAN

Joined: December/22/2006
Location: North Dakota
Status: Offline
Points: 22024
how did i start all this??
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: February/16/2008 at 14:59
Ed Connelly View Drop Down
Optics Retard
Optics Retard
Avatar
God of no Chihuahua

Joined: December/16/2007
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 24220
By making that remark about Levi's versus Wrangler's!!!  You took my little joke and turned it into a Jerry Springer chair-throwing thread!!!
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: February/16/2008 at 15:01
pyro6999 View Drop Down
Optics Retard
Optics Retard
Avatar
OT TITAN

Joined: December/22/2006
Location: North Dakota
Status: Offline
Points: 22024
well im sorry then my bad yall!
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: February/16/2008 at 15:14
Ed Connelly View Drop Down
Optics Retard
Optics Retard
Avatar
God of no Chihuahua

Joined: December/16/2007
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 24220
No%20No             Not a problem, you Knothead!!       Smile
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: February/16/2008 at 15:19
pyro6999 View Drop Down
Optics Retard
Optics Retard
Avatar
OT TITAN

Joined: December/22/2006
Location: North Dakota
Status: Offline
Points: 22024
dude whats with the name calling, i would expect a lot more from oil field trash, and i can say that as i spent a fair amount of time in the patch myself! knot head!
 
roughneck!
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: February/16/2008 at 15:42
300S&W View Drop Down
Optics God
Optics God
Avatar

Joined: January/27/2008
Location: Burlington,WV
Status: Offline
Points: 10592
                          Alright ya damn brats! Break it up! I gotta make a decision here and I can't even think with all this damn yellin! NOW I need a scope and I"ve gotta compromise between weight and low light gathering,so is a Leupold 1.75-6x32 w/ hvy plex reticle any count? Gotta headache!
 
                                                               til later
 
P.S.  Ed,hog rings work better than barb wire fasteners.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: February/16/2008 at 15:42
Ed Connelly View Drop Down
Optics Retard
Optics Retard
Avatar
God of no Chihuahua

Joined: December/16/2007
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 24220
It was an affectionate name calling, Mr. Sensitive! Bandito  Hoo-Boy...." Don't tell my mother I work in the Oilfield..................She thinks I'm a piano player in a whorehouse!"    Roll%20on%20Floor%20Laughing
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: February/16/2008 at 15:46
pyro6999 View Drop Down
Optics Retard
Optics Retard
Avatar
OT TITAN

Joined: December/22/2006
Location: North Dakota
Status: Offline
Points: 22024
that would work s&w!
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: February/16/2008 at 15:47
silver View Drop Down
Optics Master
Optics Master


Joined: November/04/2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2291
If low light is your concern, then ditch Leupold.  Thier glass is dark.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: February/16/2008 at 16:24
300S&W View Drop Down
Optics God
Optics God
Avatar

Joined: January/27/2008
Location: Burlington,WV
Status: Offline
Points: 10592
                      OK silver,hows about a Burris Sig. Safari 1.75-5x32. I tell ya I really like that Zeiss 1.8-5.5x38 but I can't deal with the wt. of it,same with Burris' 1.5-6x40 Sig. Select. My rifle weighs 6 3/4lbs. w/ everything except scope and my 3.5-10x40AO Leupold makes it top hvy so I've gotta keep the wt. down. Appreciate some help!
 
                                                         til later
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: February/16/2008 at 16:47
300S&W View Drop Down
Optics God
Optics God
Avatar

Joined: January/27/2008
Location: Burlington,WV
Status: Offline
Points: 10592
                      What'll work? The scope or the hog rings?
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: February/16/2008 at 16:48
pyro6999 View Drop Down
Optics Retard
Optics Retard
Avatar
OT TITAN

Joined: December/22/2006
Location: North Dakota
Status: Offline
Points: 22024
hog rings, im not much of a leupold fan anymore.
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Similar Threads: "Low range variable scopes-new vs old"
Subject Author Forum Replies Last Post
Inexpensive low range variable scopes koshkin Rifle Scopes 10 10/1/2006 2:04:17 PM
Low Power Variable in $200 Range? 556A2 Rifle Scopes 12
Discuss: Best Low Variable Tac Scopes UNDER $500 shooter07 Tactical Scopes 17
Discuss: Best Low Variable Tac Scopes UNDER $1000 shooter07 Tactical Scopes 5
New Swarovski X5 Long Range Rifle Scopes Chris Farris Tactical Scopes 6
new scope = range visit stork23raz The Range Report 17
New Guy, Old shooter, Best Scope Question burfurd Tactical Scopes 16
Old scope - New problem Dawgdad Rifle Scopes 5
Low Variable Power Scope for 7mm08? LeakyWaders Rifle Scopes 13
Low power variable rimfire scope? kmmoran Rimfire / Airgun 21


This page was generated in 0.406 seconds.