New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Leuopold M8:  more similar to Fx-ii or Fx-iii?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Check GunBroker.com for SWFA's No Reserve and No Minimum bid firearm auctions.

Leuopold M8: more similar to Fx-ii or Fx-iii?

 Post Reply Post Reply   Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: March/15/2017 at 16:05
carved View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper


Joined: March/10/2017
Status: Offline
Points: 21
Well, the title says it all.  I have an M8 that might be shot.  I'm wondering if it's similar to the Fx-ii or fx-iii.  Thanks.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: March/15/2017 at 16:10
koshkin View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar
Dark Lord of Optics

Joined: June/15/2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 11944
That depends on the model. M8 were Leupold's fixed power scopes prior to the upgrade to FX.

Why not have Leupold repair it?

ILya
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: March/26/2017 at 22:58
carved View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper


Joined: March/10/2017
Status: Offline
Points: 21
I sent it to Leupold, and we'll see if anything can be done.  It's 6x-36.  Beyond this, I don't know what model it might be.  It seems these scopes go for between $120 and $320 on Fleabay.  Like most things related to scopes, I'm baffled by how there is such a wide range in prices that people are getting for these.  So, if it can't be fixed, what would be the closest, the fx-ii or fx-iii?  thanks.
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Similar Threads: "Leuopold M8: more similar to Fx-ii or Fx-iii?"
Subject Author Forum Replies Last Post
There are no similar posts.
Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.10
Copyright ©2001-2017 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.203 seconds.