|
|
| Visit the SWFA.com site to check out our current specials. |
Leica vs Z5 |
Post Reply 
|
| Author | |
cbm 
Optics Journeyman 
Joined: January/11/2008 Location: SC Status: Offline Points: 549 |
 Post Options
 Thanks(0)
 Quote Reply
 Topic: Leica vs Z5Posted: October/04/2011 at 16:14 |
|
Got the itch for another alpha class scope , even though I know I don't need it. Want some input anyway. It's going to replace a 3.5-10x44 Conquest on my Cooper Excalibur .30-06. Currently have Luepold 1" mounts on the gun and it's shooting better than 1/2" MOA with factory ammo at 100 yrds.
Looking at the Leica 3.5-18x42 plex with elevation turret. Worried about the thin plex as I do not like real thin plex reticles(but don't want another 4a) . I do not have access to one of these scopes to look at it in person. Plus I would have to change my rings out for this scope. Not worried about the 30mm tube but like that this scope has the hydrophobic coatings. I also hunt with Leica Ultravid 10x42 bino's .
Other option is Swarovski Z5 3.5-18X44 plex with the ballistic turret. Had a swarovski before and liked it a lot for the most part. The plex was big enough to see in real low light but I would have preffered it a tad bigger. I know how well the coil spring system works on these scopes for holding a zero(a huge plus for me). Glass is great. Don't have to change rings(not a huge deal anyway). No hydrophobic coatings.
Price is the same, basically. Which would you guys choose ? Mostly still hunting (with low light shot capability important) from 100-400 yrds. Edited by cbm - October/04/2011 at 16:17 |
|
 |
|
|
stickbow46
Optics Master Extraordinaire 
Joined: January/07/2009 Location: Benton, Pa Status: Offline Points: 4677 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: October/04/2011 at 16:33 |
|
I've owned both the scopes you mentioned & they are both excellent,you might want to take a look at the Premier Hunter.If it's the glass only you seek buy the non illum.I have the 7A plex illum. & the only scope in my stable that matches is Zeiss Victory FL which cost addtional $1K.
Forgot to mention ,the Premier line is made here in the USA. Edited by stickbow46 - October/04/2011 at 16:36 |
|
|
Pearls of Wisdom are Heard not Spoken
|
|
|
|
|
Bitterroot Bulls
Optics Master Extraordinaire
Joined: May/07/2009 Location: Montana Status: Offline Points: 3416 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: October/05/2011 at 08:29 |
|
Those are two very similar scopes, cbm. I think the coil springs are the tie-breaker. I would go with the Swaro.
|
|
|
-Matt
|
|
|
|
|
cbm
Optics Journeyman
Joined: January/11/2008 Location: SC Status: Offline Points: 549 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: October/05/2011 at 08:38 |
|
Looking into it a little more and it looks like the subtensions on both scopes are about the same. Little on the thin side but my last plex model Swarovski PV 3-12X50 was managable in real low light.
I don't know how strong the retention system is in the Leica. So yep, I'm in a "known" durability deal on the Swaro versus the hydrophobic coatings in the Leica ?? I figure the low light performance has to be about the same.
|
|
|
|
|
JGRaider
Optics Master 
Joined: February/06/2008 Status: Offline Points: 1517 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: October/05/2011 at 09:19 |
|
If my rifle shot 1/2 MOA I"d keep what I had. They'll all get you past legal shooting light, easily. If you're bound and determined to switch I'd choose Leica last.
|
|
|
|
|
cbm
Optics Journeyman
Joined: January/11/2008 Location: SC Status: Offline Points: 549 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: October/05/2011 at 09:31 |
|
I agree. I sold a Zeiss Diavari, Swaro PV and a Kahles Helia C ..........swore on here even....that Conquests can do all that needs to be done legally. But there is a difference even if it's arguably small .........I am going through one of those phases that I want to pay for that difference "right now". Next year I will probably say I should have just kept the Conquest.
 
|
|
|
|
|
cbm
Optics Journeyman
Joined: January/11/2008 Location: SC Status: Offline Points: 549 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: October/06/2011 at 17:00 |
|
Can anyone tell me if the plex reticles in the Z5 or Leica ER scopes are FFP or SFP ? |
|
|
|
|
stickbow46
Optics Master Extraordinaire
Joined: January/07/2009 Location: Benton, Pa Status: Offline Points: 4677 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: October/06/2011 at 18:06 |
|
Both are SFP
Edited by stickbow46 - October/06/2011 at 18:09 |
|
|
Pearls of Wisdom are Heard not Spoken
|
|
|
|
|
Skylar McMahon
TEAM SWFA - Admin 
Capt. BlowHard Joined: April/05/2011 Location: TEXAS Status: Offline Points: 6053 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: October/06/2011 at 22:32 |
Traditional hunting scopes are all going to be SFP. Especially plex reticles. |
|
|
Amat Victoria Curam
|
|
|
|
|
cbm
Optics Journeyman
Joined: January/11/2008 Location: SC Status: Offline Points: 549 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: October/07/2011 at 06:12 |
|
My Swaro PV was a FFP plex ............guess I was hoping they still made them like that. Thanks !
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
Topic Options
cbm wrote: