New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Kahles 3-9x42
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Check GunBroker.com for SWFA's No Reserve and No Minimum bid firearm auctions.

Kahles 3-9x42

 Post Reply Post Reply   Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: June/13/2004 at 01:04
Roy Finn View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar
Steiner Junkie

Joined: April/05/2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4856

A question for Chris,Ranburr and all, after all my ranting and raving about  the Elite 4200's, I am norrowing down my choice and I am leaning towards the Kahles 3-9x42. Most of you know how fond I am of the Elite 4200's, but I am starting to zero in on the Kahles 3-9x42. My question is simple, based on real life hunting situations, would I be completely satisfied with this choice of Euro optics. I realize in this price range that the competition is about as good as gets,so I won't beat the dead horse with a comparision to the 1" Swarovski( 3-10x42) or a 1" Zeiss. Any hands on experience is what I am looking for.Thanks in advance.

 

P.S. The only delimma will be is which gun, my 280 Ackley or my 300 Win Mag, I would replace my 4200 with the  Kahles with the TDS reticle!!! Don't even go there Chris or Ranburr and say replace both!!!


 



Edited by Roy Finn
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: June/13/2004 at 13:07
ranburr View Drop Down
Optics Master
Optics Master


Joined: May/16/2004
Status: Offline
Points: 1082

Roy, I don't personally own any Kahles scopes, but I do know people that do and they like them.  I have shot with several and they struck me as having bright clear optics that always returned to zero regardless of the power setting.  Chris prefers the Kahles, I prefer the Zeiss Conquest, but price works into my equation.  The TDS reticle is a really neat system that few people use to its' full potential.  It can actually do more than just hold over.  For all practical U.S. hunting situations, I think the Kahles will be right there for you (so would that 4200).  I say U.S. hunting because the higher end Swarovski, Zeiss, etc. show why they cost so much when it comes to European style night hunting (not really an issue here).  In my opinion, for standard U.S. hunting hours and conditions (between dawn and dusk, inside of 400 yards), you can't get any better performance regardless of price.  Versus your 4200, I think the Kahles is made from higher grade components that give it a slight edge.  Enjoy your new scope! 

 

ranburr    

Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: June/14/2004 at 16:04
Chris Farris View Drop Down
TEAM SWFA - Admin
TEAM SWFA - Admin
Avatar
swfa.com

Joined: October/01/2003
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 7765

 

Every since they redesigned their scopes a few years ago I have been a big a fan of Kahles.  The 42mm objective allows for a larger exit pupil but will still mount with low rings in most application.  It is also compact and light weight for a 3-9x42 at 12 inches and 13 ounces. Its superb glass and coatings will blow you away, especially in low light.  Combine those features with the TDS reticle and you have a scope that is hard to beat.

 

 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Similar Threads: "Kahles 3-9x42"
Subject Author Forum Replies Last Post
Kahles 3-9x42 multizero Pundan Rifle Scopes 4
Kahles CL3-9x42 or 3-10x50? mpk Rifle Scopes 9
Kahles 3-9x42 CL brav302 Rifle Scopes 6
1999 Kahles AH 3-9x42 153 Rifle Scopes 11
Well, I did it! Kahles 3-9x42 HeliaCL SSgtSmitty Rifle Scopes 13
Kahles KX 3-9x42 Question eas Rifle Scopes 0
KAHLES KX 3-9x42 GunAround Rifle Scopes 4
Mounting Kahles CL 3-9x42 on Sako A7 faldoc Rifle Scopes 6
KAHLES Rifle Scope Helia CL 3-9x42 - 4A KAH51712 cropslx Rifle Scopes 4
Kahles Helia KX 3-9X42 ***SOLD*** skywalker Optics For Sale 1


This page was generated in 0.312 seconds.