New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - IOR or Leuoold Mark 5
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Check GunBroker.com for SWFA's No Reserve and No Minimum bid firearm auctions.

IOR or Leuoold Mark 5

 Post Reply Post Reply   Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: March/08/2017 at 11:51
chuckman View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper


Joined: March/08/2017
Location: Durham, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 6

Greetings;  I am no stranger to the AR platform out to 700 yards; but I am new to precision bolt.  I have the rifle, and here are my three options for glass:  IOR Valdada 10x42, Leupold Mark 4 3.5-10, and Leupold Mark 4 6.5-20.  Only occasionally, rarely, will I shoot to 1,000 yards, and it will be used for banging steel only, maybe a competition or two.  Most likely range will be 300-700 yards. 

Of these three choices given how I will be shooting, what is the better option?


Thanks!!

Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: March/08/2017 at 12:13
chuckman View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper


Joined: March/08/2017
Location: Durham, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 6
Edit title:  Should read Leupold Mark 4.  I am seriously under-caffeinated today.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: March/08/2017 at 14:00
Rancid Coolaid View Drop Down
Optics Jedi Master
Optics Jedi Master
Avatar

Joined: January/19/2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 8184
So...before I answer, why those 3? And how are your final 3 so dissimilar?

What caliber rifle?
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: March/08/2017 at 14:43
chuckman View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper


Joined: March/08/2017
Location: Durham, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 6

Great questions.  I am used to 10x.  The IOR gets a lot of love (as does the SWFA 10x HD, which could be an option).  I have shot the Leupold Mark 4 6.5-20; it has a lot of magnification, more than I need, but I can get a good deal on it.  I chose the Mark 4 3.5-10 as a middle ground.  Rem .308.

Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: March/08/2017 at 16:02
supertool73 View Drop Down
Optics God
Optics God
Avatar
Superstool

Joined: January/03/2008
Location: Utah
Status: Offline
Points: 10196
Personally I would pick either the SWFA 10xHD, the 3-9x HD or the 5-20x HD.  Those 3 are better scopes than the comparables that you listed. 
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: March/09/2017 at 10:56
Rancid Coolaid View Drop Down
Optics Jedi Master
Optics Jedi Master
Avatar

Joined: January/19/2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 8184
My 308 AR wears a 2.5-10 and it is a good fit.  I have said many times that I am no fan of scopes>20X, they are simply too picky to get behind - and especially in unconventional shooting positions.  I too would stick with something in the 3-10X range unless it will be exclusively a range gun and always from a very well supported position.

On the IOR10X vs SS10X, no question, SS.  IOR's can be hit-n-miss with quality and customer service, SWFA is hit-n-miss with neither.  Also, I like the turrets more on the 10XHD, glass is comparable, and prices are similar.

If you want a bit more mag, there is an S3-15X also.  It is not HD glass and doesn't have the newest turrets, but it is serviceable and a very good deal.

Lastly, and a bit antiquated, I know:  I am no fan of Leupold,  their offering was too expensive and too crappy for too long for me to trust them.  I hear they have made huge strides in the past several years, great for them, I'm still no fan of the company.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: March/09/2017 at 13:39
chuckman View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper


Joined: March/08/2017
Location: Durham, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 6
So, a SS 3-15, while less expensive, is a better scope than the Leupold Mark 4 (in either configuration)?
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: March/09/2017 at 13:43
chuckman View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper


Joined: March/08/2017
Location: Durham, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 6
And given my intended application (target shooting, maybe some competition) the 10X HD or the 3-15 FFP?
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: March/09/2017 at 13:51
Rancid Coolaid View Drop Down
Optics Jedi Master
Optics Jedi Master
Avatar

Joined: January/19/2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 8184
Competition, definitely a variable. Nothing sucks more than shoot-n-move and losing your target because you have too much magnification. For bench, 10X is fine, for movement, it is way too much.

And I haven't run those Leupolds, but I have run Leupolds, and I'd take an SS any day.

To those still spinning Leupolds turrets, do you still have to spin past and come back to it, else the adjustment is wrong?
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Similar Threads: "IOR or Leuoold Mark 5"
Subject Author Forum Replies Last Post
IOR VALDADA reputation and resale value? zeropointzero Tactical Scopes 18
SS HD 10X42 or IOR 10X42 scorpio ps Rifle Scopes 3
ior 10x56 or ior 10 x42 ? Exoman Rifle Scopes 5 12/3/2006 3:38:27 AM
IOR picatinny rail for Sako 85 kaiwang188 Rings and bases 1
Leupold Mark 4 LR/T cmr287 Tactical Scopes 8
Savage Mark II Bases Question :Long Shot Rings and bases 3
IOR Valdada 3-18x50 MP-8 X1 reticle Thefieldster1 Tactical Scopes 11
IOR 2-12x32 Scope Value? MAK Rifle Scopes 7
IOR Valdada ballistic calculator kickin45 Reloading & Ballistics 3
Leupold Mark 6, 3-18, Illuminated TMR, M5C2 turret ccoker Optics For Sale 0


This page was generated in 0.375 seconds.