New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Illuminated or not?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Check for SWFA's No Reserve and No Minimum bid firearm auctions.

Illuminated or not?

 Post Reply Post Reply   Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: May/22/2015 at 06:08
Bob4 View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper

Joined: May/22/2015
Status: Offline
Points: 2
Hell oall,
 First post here.
  Last yr I missed a chance on a decent buck as the light faded. I was wondering if an illuminated recticle would have helped. I could see the antlers and that it seemed to be a mature buck but lost sight of my recticle when placed on the animal. I was using a Swarovski Z-5. Dare I say nice glass.
 Can anyone honestly say that an illuminated recticle bought them an extra 5 or 10 minutes more to hunt? Curious as to others thoughts or experience on this.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: May/22/2015 at 07:11
Kickboxer View Drop Down

Joined: February/13/2008
Status: Offline
Points: 18161

I can honestly say that a well designed and executed illuminated reticle provides an advantage in low light shooting situations... for me.  Rheostat-type control vs "step" control of illumination value requires some hands on evaluation.  Illumination allows one to "get on target" faster (and sometimes at all) under low light, low contrast conditions.  The real advantage is in low light shooting into dense areas of brush, etc where shadows can almost completely "fade out" the reticle/target.  I've taken several deer in "last minute" situations that I probably would have passed on but for illuminated reticle.  If you are always shooting into open fields with minimum shadow in those "first/last 30 minute" situations, using a good duplex/post type reticle with good (does not have to be GREAT) is probably sufficient. 

I have a Z6i (1-6) (and several other Alpha scopes with illumination).  The glass is amazing.  However, the illuminated reticle is both well designed and executed and it works extremely well.  Takes out potential uncertainty.  For me... that works.

I also have some "moderately priced" scopes with illumination where it was just an afterthought (oh, let's add illumination to the reticle... they'll buy that).  Not so good and never used (except sometimes in broad daylight, just because it is there). 

 If it is well done, I'll take illumination every time.  You don't HAVE to use it.  But if you do need it and it is not there... que sera.  Not many do illumination well, though it is getting better "across the board".  Good/great glass will always be #1. Illuminated reticles are a personal choice and need careful consideration and some "hands on" evaluation before investment (they do cost more and they do add some weight to the scope which adds weight to the rifle.). Consider well, buy quality, if you buy.   I have and have used red and green.  I like red better.  Though green impact is generally "minimal", red light has no impact on "night vision".  Thirty minutes after sunset is not "night", but vision is still impacted by bright points of light. 

Whether it will help you or not, I cannot say.  It has helped me.

My personal thoughts on the "illuminated vs non-illuminated" issue.  

Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: May/22/2015 at 15:10
Alan Robertson View Drop Down
Optics Master
Optics Master

Joined: October/31/2009
Location: Oklahoma
Status: Offline
Points: 1708
I'd agree with Kickboxer  that illumination is a worthwhile addition to a scope's capabilities- when it is executed correctly. "Executed correctly" is the rub. Until recently, many/most lower- priced illum. implementations were a waste of resources, except in higher- end, pr purpose- built optics, such as Aimpoint. There are exceptions to that statement: my experience with such scopes is limited.
The primary fault of most lit- reticle schemes is a bleed- out effect of the illumination from the reticle, over the entire viewable image. This effect becomes more pronounced as the brightness is turned up until one is left peering into a bright red/green image, completely unable to view any part of the target. In other words, you're looking into a light and the target is totally obscured. With the worst designs, even at the lowest power setting, for use in the darkest night, the effect is still there.
A secondary phenomenon of poorly executed designs is that the lit reticle (and any bleed- out into the image plane) is visible downrange, as the glow is visible if looking directly into the objective lens. That is completely unacceptable in a scope used as a CQB optic, for instance.

One additional benefit of illumination is its usefulness in broad daylight, as an aid in fast target acquisition. This is a very important aspect of scope use and should not be overlooked. The lit reticle is the first thing your eye sees as the rifle is brought into firing position and can instantly be brought onto target, with even a higher magnification than one might usually consider as a fast- action power setting.

I only have 2 scopes with illumination and neither is an Alpha level scope  One doesn't carry a battery, as it's "lit part" works too poorly to bother with and the other is a mid- range Leupold.  Leupold has developed illumination using fiber optic technology, called "FireDot" and the result is all anyone could ask for, with none of the usual faults, as mentioned above. Leupold builds this reticle into more than one model line, giving a broad price range to choose from. FireDot works, period. The only caveat is that Leupy does not currently give as good a warranty on the FireDot portion of their scopes as they do with the rest of the scope, so if it breaks beyond the warranty period, the owner pays. I suspect the short warranty is because there isn't a long enough history with FireDot to determine warranty amortization costs, included in purchase price, as with all scopes.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: May/22/2015 at 15:59
bugsNbows View Drop Down
Optics Jedi Master
Optics Jedi Master

Joined: March/10/2008
Location: Florida
Status: Offline
Points: 9254
The Trijicon Accupoint scopes work pretty darn well in low light applications.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: May/22/2015 at 17:03
308WIN View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice

Joined: February/28/2009
Status: Offline
Points: 120
anyone like or seen DIGILLUM by NF
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: May/23/2015 at 18:25
saltydog235 View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice

Joined: January/07/2013
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 97
I've had a number of illuminated scopes, some good, some bad. Alan eluded to bleed over., a Weaver Tactical I had was the worst. Not a bad optic for the price paid but turn on the illumination even at low and it was about as useful as tits on a Bo hog. These days, I stick to a Trijicon for my late in the evening sits. They do illumination as good as anyone.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: May/24/2015 at 19:41
Urimaginaryfrnd View Drop Down
Resident Redneck

Joined: June/20/2005
Location: Iowa
Status: Offline
Points: 13825
O strongly prefer illlumination.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: May/25/2015 at 01:25
Outrider View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice

Joined: February/03/2011
Location: MS
Status: Offline
Points: 89
I, like others, have taken bucks using a good illuminated reticle scope that would have walked without the illuminated point-of-aim being there. And like others, I recommend buying good glass along with the illumination feature. The Zeiss HT, Swaro Z6i, Meopta Meostar R1 or R2, Trijicon Accupoint and Leupold VX-6 Firedot seem to get most of the attention on several forums I monitor as being some of the better illuminated 30mm scopes. Perhaps other contributors can add to this list.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: May/25/2015 at 17:12
RifleDude View Drop Down

Joined: October/13/2006
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 14239
I like illuminated reticles a lot. It's definitely a big asset for low light hunting, as long as the illumination is well designed. As already mentioned, poorly designed illumination create too much light inside the scope or excessive internal flare. This obscures your view of your target in low light and causes your iris to constrict, hindering your dim light visibility. Usually, I've found less is better here. I prefer not to have the entire reticle lit; only the very center dot, cross, circle dot, or triangle. Any more than that, and it's easy to get the over-illumination problem discussed.

Poorly designed illumination is worse than no illumination.
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Similar Threads: "Illuminated or not?"
Subject Author Forum Replies Last Post
illuminated or not? JackTheRipper Rifle Scopes 19
5-20 SS Illuminated or not Anton Chigurh Tactical Scopes 4
To illuminate or not to illuminate?Help BBQ BOY Rifle Scopes 4 10/1/2007 10:37:58 PM
Illuminated Nikoplex or not AuburnEngineer Rifle Scopes 17 1/13/2007 7:45:33 PM
illuminated reticle vs non-illuminated Crotchity Tactical Scopes 7
Not my best, not my worst. helo18 The Range Report 7
Scopes: not too big, not too small, just right koshkin Rifle Scopes 23
Illuminated Scope or Not for Ultimate Deer scope? Flakbait Rifle Scopes 22
Mueller illuminated scope gaucho9 Rifle Scopes 9
Leupold Mark 6, 3-18, Illuminated TMR, M5C2 turret ccoker Optics For Sale 0

This page was generated in 0.297 seconds.