OpticsTalk by SWFA, Inc. Homepage SWFA     SampleList.com
Forum Home Forum Home > Scopes > Varmint Scopes
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Refining Ballistic Reticles?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Visit the SWFA.com site to check out our current specials.

Refining Ballistic Reticles?

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
sscoyote View Drop Down
Optics Journeyman
Optics Journeyman


Joined: October/05/2004
Status: Offline
Points: 328
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote sscoyote Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Refining Ballistic Reticles?
    Posted: January/29/2005 at 23:39

Copied this over from the Specialty Pistols website. Thought it might be helpful here:

 

Mood of the topic. posted <>document.write(''+ myTimeZone('Fri, 28 January 2005 22:16:11 GMT-0800', 'January 29, 2005 01:16 AM')+''); January 29, 2005 01:16 AM January 29, 2005 01:16 AM
Appears to be some interest in this topic, so i'm going to post what i've been working on lately. Here's how it goes:

Sometimes the trajectory curve doesn't follow ballistic reticles well enuf to give even 50 or 100 yd. zero's, but it's actually fairly easy to apply a little trick that the mil-dot guys use to reference their zeros in 25, or 50 yd. increments.
OK, suppose we have a 2-7X Burris that has the following stadia subtensions in MOA:
2.1
6.2
10.4
15.5

Now, run a ballistics program for your rig-- say a hypothetical 308 Encore-- 150 Ball. Tip @ 2600 fps @ 4600 elevation- 50 degrees, 200 yd sight-in distance. The stadia zeros will be:

272 yds.
393
502
618

Now most guys will just leave it at that, or maybe tweak it a little to try and get a better trajectory-stadia fit to get more even (50 or 100 yd.) zero #'s, and then simply approximate their holdovers for in between ranges, but suppose u want to leave it right where it's at. It's not a bad "fit", but may not be the easiest to try and shoot a coyote @ 550, or 459, or whatever range. But if there was a way to reference a little more accurately for interpolating between stadia, then it would provide a little edge, so to speak, for better long-range hits. As mentioned before, some of the mil-dot users apply a system that helps for interpolating by dividing the stadia (mil-dot) gaps into tenths of a unit, thereby making interpolation easier instead of just guessing. Turns out that system can be easily applied for our ballistic reticles also like this:

1) Subtract each stadia MOA measurement from the next larger stadia to calculate total MOA gap between each stadia:

6.2 - 2.1= 4.1 MOA
10.4 - 6.2= 4.2
15.5 - 10.4= 5.1

Now we already know that 2.1 MOA (our 1st stadia)= 272 yds., and the 2nd stadia= 393 yds., but we want to know where 300, 325, 350, and 375 lie between those 2 stadia, so, if we refer to the trajectory printout, we see that the following drop in MOA for each range is:

300= 2.75
325= 3.75
350= 4.5
375= 5.25

Now subtract the closer STADIA MOA zero from each 25 yd. MOA calc, as follows:

300= 2.75- 2.1= .65
325= 3.75- 2.1= 1.65
350= 4.5-2.1= 2.4
375= 5.25- 2.1= 3.15

Now simply divide each remainder by the total gap MOA calc. (4.1), to get the amount of interpolation for each range between the 2 stadia (what we're doing is making imaginary stadia that's easier to reference besides just guessing for each 25 yd. range increment), as follows:

300= .65/4.1= .2
325= 1.65/4.1= .4
350= 2.4/4.1= .6
375= 3.15/4.1= .75

Now calculate the rest of the 25 (or 50-- whatever u choose) yd. zeros for the other stadia "gaps", and make a "better" range sticker for each zero. The part we just calculated would look like this on the range sticker:

272= 1 SU (stadia unit)
300= 1.2
325= 1.4
350= 1.6
375= 1.75
393= 2

I would venture to say that a guy using this system could become very proficient at placing the bullets right where they need to go, with a little prtactice-- even at long-range.

Steve
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.01
Copyright ©2001-2018 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.406 seconds.