OpticsTalk by SWFA, Inc. Homepage SWFA     SampleList.com
Forum Home Forum Home > Scopes > Rifle Scopes
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Schmidt Bender scopes?????
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Visit the SWFA.com site to check out our current specials.

Schmidt Bender scopes?????

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123>
Author
Message
cheaptrick View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar

Joined: September/27/2004
Location: South Carolina
Status: Offline
Points: 20844
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote cheaptrick Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September/18/2007 at 17:06
Originally posted by Duce Duce wrote:

I get the impression that some believe the government buys things like we do as individuals, based on quality & price. Many government purchases are determined by who has what lobbyist or friends & relatives in Washington or who employees what retired general or senator on the company board. I have seen this apply in large purchases & small. The point is that we cannot take a government purchase as evidence of "best" quality.
 
Duce 

 

I agree for the most part, but I sincerely believe that the folks that chose the PM II for the Marines did so out of a pure heart.

Back to Top
spreader View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice


Joined: July/31/2007
Status: Offline
Points: 77
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote spreader Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September/18/2007 at 17:23
cheaptrick,

Okay, let me get this straight. We're emitting large amounts of vapor arguing the quality of finished product based on one post on one particular internet bulletin board?

As far as S&B quality people being here in US. I'm quite certain they either don't have anyone here or they don't have any authority over manufacturing at PR. Most of S&B employees in Germany probably don't even speak English anyway, so even if they did send someone to oversee production at PR in Virginia, I'm certain there is very little they can do about the process. They can only set basic set of quality benchmarks, which would be definitely lower than their home-base factory. US-made Zeiss Conquests are good, but nowhere near as good as German-made Diavaris. Lexus just recently finally got their US assembly to reach quality of Japan-based factories. Remember movie "Gung Ho" ?

Premier Reticle is official supplier of S&B designed scopes to US Marine Corps. S&B provided design and most likely provides optical glass. I don't know who makes the tubes, knobs and other metal parts, but I think it would be S&B only part of the way. Premier Reticle however is official maker of the scopes, they make the sale, they offer support. If the scope that had failed did so because of flaw of design by S&B - then sure S&B is partly to blame. If it failed due to parts sourced by PR - it's entirely fault of PR.

It's up to PR to notice the problem in design, since they're the official supplier of these scope to USMC. I suspect however that what had happened is that S&B under contract supplies major components, whereis PR manufactures/sources smaller parts. Since PR performs final assembly, it's PRs product in every way. Poor quality of 1911 clones made in China would have nothing to do with John Moses Browning's design, even if they used parts made by say Springfield.

To put it even in simpler terms. Suppose you have designs for Leica M camera. Unless you have been working for Leica for a long time - good luck achieving their level of quality when making that camera. Just about any company that tried had failed. Same works with every other complicated product - having plans/designs/specs is no guarantee of proper assembly.

Since it seems that so far these are the only issues that affected this scope (and that PR admitted and fixed), I'd say that Marines got something they can truly rely on.
Back to Top
Duce View Drop Down
Optics Master
Optics Master
Avatar

Joined: September/19/2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1231
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Duce Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September/18/2007 at 17:25

I hope so but I know that is not always the case & I think they should try to buy American if possible.

 

Duce   

Duce
Back to Top
spreader View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice


Joined: July/31/2007
Status: Offline
Points: 77
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote spreader Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September/18/2007 at 17:32
Duce,

Agree with that. It's a matter of national security, so they should rely on people that have an interest in protecting this Free Nation. In real world however it's a simple fact of life that Germans are really good at optics.
And that means that if the best product happens to be German-made - so be it. As far as I'm concerned, if it does the job better than anything else, I don't care where it's made - South Africa, Zimbabwe or Germany.
It makes no logical sense for Marines (or Army) to source inferior products then. If the enemy is better armed or has better equipment than what US-based companies can provide, then Marines/Army have to source something from outside to get the edge. I'm sure you don't want them to fight with spears and swords, do you? :)


Back to Top
Rancid Coolaid View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar

Joined: January/19/2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 9318
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Rancid Coolaid Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September/18/2007 at 17:41
Spreader, you a HOG?
Freedom is something you take.
Respect is something you earn.
Equality is something you whine about not being given.
Back to Top
cheaptrick View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar

Joined: September/27/2004
Location: South Carolina
Status: Offline
Points: 20844
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote cheaptrick Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September/18/2007 at 17:45

Originally posted by spreader spreader wrote:

As far as S&B quality people being here in US. I'm quite certain they either don't have anyone here or they don't have any authority over manufacturing at PR. Most of S&B employees in Germany probably don't even speak English anyway, so even if they did send someone to oversee production at PR in Virginia, I'm certain there is very little they can do about the process.

 

Who's name is on the scope?? Premier Reticle or Schmidt and Bender??

 

Maybe your right spreader, maybe I'm looking at this deal all wrong. 

Believe it or not, I'm actually a big fan of S&B products.

 

The one thing we all can agree on here. We all want our troops to get the best gear available to perform their duties and come home safely.  

Back to Top
spreader View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice


Joined: July/31/2007
Status: Offline
Points: 77
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote spreader Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September/18/2007 at 17:47
cheaptrick,

See for yourself:

http://www.premierreticles.com/M8541.htm

:)

Back to Top
Duce View Drop Down
Optics Master
Optics Master
Avatar

Joined: September/19/2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1231
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Duce Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September/18/2007 at 17:52

Spreader I suggest you look at the real good glass in F-15s F-22 and the pilots helmets is does not come from Germany or any outside country it is mad in the US by PPG & Dow-Corning. It is higher quality than you can buy for riflescopes & much more expensive.  Try pricing one of those old F-15 helments and a S&B will look like a real bargan. I feel our goverment needs to make a much bigger effort to buy American not just a wal-Mart buy American show.

 

Duce

Duce
Back to Top
cheaptrick View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar

Joined: September/27/2004
Location: South Carolina
Status: Offline
Points: 20844
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote cheaptrick Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September/18/2007 at 17:55

Originally posted by spreader spreader wrote:

cheaptrick,

See for yourself:

http://www.premierreticles.com/M8541.htm

:)

 

Ah damn, I walked into that one, huh?? 

 

Excellent commentary from you my friend....I still say S&B "should" have more control over the QC of the scope and if there is some flaw, however minor, S&B and who ever should correct it.

Peoples lives are at risk.

 

I still got a hard on USO didn't get the contract in the first place....  

 

Good shooting!!

Back to Top
spreader View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice


Joined: July/31/2007
Status: Offline
Points: 77
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote spreader Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September/18/2007 at 18:06
Duce,

First of all, I don't really know which glass in particular you're talking about, but how do you know it's actually made by PPG & Dow-Corning? 
Could be a deal similar to PR/S&B if you know what I mean.

Second issue is - Leupold makes scopes in US, but they source the glass from outside US, most likely from Japan. Final product doesn't really compete with anything S&B has.

Third issue is - glass in helmets is one thing, optical glass used in scopes (I mean any scopes, be it riflescope, telescope, spotting scope) is a totally different game.

By the way, I'm sure you know that most of goods sold in WalMart are Made In China :)

Back to Top
koshkin View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar
Dark Lord of Optics

Joined: June/15/2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 13182
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote koshkin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September/18/2007 at 18:37
As far as glass goes, Schott is not the only maker in the world.  They are very good, but I do not think Ohara is a distant second.  Ohara makes good glass.  When I worked in microoptics, after a fair amount of screwing around with Schott and Ohara glass, I ended up going with Ohara.  For certain things, Schott may be better.  For others, Ohara is better.  Then there is Hoya which makes a lot of very nice glass used in photographic lenses.

Another good glass maker is Corning.  While their catalog of optical glass is perhaps less extensive than Schott and Ohara, it is worth noting that Leica sources their highly touted binocular and spotting scope glass from Corning.

ILya


Back to Top
spreader View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice


Joined: July/31/2007
Status: Offline
Points: 77
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote spreader Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September/18/2007 at 18:54
Ilya,

Just as I said, Schott and Ohara have the most extensive selection. I didn't say they were the only ones. I said that Schott has the most extensive, "best", selection.
Hoya photo filters are okay. I prefer B+W though.

As far as Leica binocs/scopes are concerned - that's interesting information. This may explain why their spotting scopes aren't up to quality of Zeiss Diascope. Leica discontinued their spotting scopes right now. No spotting scopes are available at the moment. They're redesigning the whole line, new scopes supposed to come out in Spring/Summer 2008. Would be interesting to know which glass they use there and if they manage to beat Zeiss.




Back to Top
koshkin View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar
Dark Lord of Optics

Joined: June/15/2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 13182
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote koshkin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September/18/2007 at 19:01
I do not think glass source is the reason for Leica spotting scope redesign.  The point I was trying to make is that top quality glass is available from several sources and the differentiator is usually what you do with that glass.

ILya
Back to Top
spreader View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice


Joined: July/31/2007
Status: Offline
Points: 77
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote spreader Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September/18/2007 at 19:03
Ilya,

Sure. Schott however has the most resources available to come out with purpose built glass types and therefore it gives Zeiss an edge over any other scope maker that has to source glass types that are available on open market. Obviously this alone doesn't necessarily guarantee the best final product, that's why S&B won USMC contract and not the Zeiss :)




Back to Top
RifleDude View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar
EVIL OPPRESSOR

Joined: October/13/2006
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 16337
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote RifleDude Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September/18/2007 at 19:04
I work for a very large international company that is the most prominent in the world in its particular market sector.  We have manufacturing facilities all over the world and we also outsource manufacturing to facilities all over the world and across the United States.  We have language barriers to deal with, and not just one language barrier, but literally dozens of languages.  We deal with it by hiring people that speak those particular languages.  It's just part of doing business around the world -- we either adapt or our competitors take market share from us; it's that simple.  Regardless of where our products are made or who makes it for us, it bears my company's name/logo and our engineers designed it, and as such, we are responsible for its quality.  The customer only sees our logo on the product, so if something is wrong, it is a poor reflection on us and only us in the customer's eyes.  Therefore, it is our responsibility to frequently audit our suppliers to make sure their work, their quality system, and their process capabilities meet our specs, and if they fail to meet our standards, they simply don't get our business. 
Ted


Money can't buy happiness... but it's much more comfortable to cry in a Porsche than on a bicycle.
Back to Top
koshkin View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar
Dark Lord of Optics

Joined: June/15/2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 13182
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote koshkin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September/18/2007 at 19:07
You can specify a particular composition and if you are a big enough customer (you do not have to be a very big customer, but big enough), they will make a custom melt for you.  I was buying several different glass types and one of them was a custom melt made by Ohara that was not in their catalog.  Schott, if memory serves me right, was also more than willing to tweak the chemistry a little if needed.

I really do not think that glass sourcing provides much of an edge for Zeiss.

ILya

Originally posted by spreader spreader wrote:

Ilya,

Sure. Schott however has the most resources available to come out with purpose built glass types and therefore it gives Zeiss an edge over any other scope maker that has to source glass types that are available on open market. Obviously this alone doesn't necessarily guarantee the best final product, that's why S&B won USMC contract and not the Zeiss :)




Back to Top
spreader View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice


Joined: July/31/2007
Status: Offline
Points: 77
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote spreader Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September/18/2007 at 19:24
Ilya,

No argument regarding ordering custom types. The point I'm trying to make is that since Zeiss controls the whole process beginning to end, they're in better position to make special glass types (or use existing ones in the best manner) for final product. If say Leupold had to order a custom type, that would cost a lot more money and if at the end Leupold would discover they made a mistake in their calculations, they're stuck with what they got. Zeiss on the other hand has so much experience and knowledge doing that, that little experimentation and few failures along the way won't hurt them too much since they control the whole process.
For all others - it's a lot of wasted time and money.

S&B is a tiny company compared to Zeiss. Big factor in their survival is the fact that they have their own glass factory, that way, just like Zeiss, they have full control over entire process. If I recall correctly, S&B as a company has a total of fewer than 200 employees. Carl Zeiss group employs more than 11,000 people worldwide. So, for Zeiss, having Schott Glasswerke is like for BMW to have their own engine casting plant.



Back to Top
koshkin View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar
Dark Lord of Optics

Joined: June/15/2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 13182
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote koshkin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September/18/2007 at 19:29
Fair enough.  Although I was under an impression that Schott was run as a separate company from Zeiss Optics.

ILya
Back to Top
spreader View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice


Joined: July/31/2007
Status: Offline
Points: 77
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote spreader Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September/18/2007 at 19:51
Ilya,

Carl Zeiss Foundation owns Carl Zeiss AG and SCHOTT AG . SCHOTT AG Group had 16,839 employees worldwide as of September 30, 2006. Carl Zeiss Group over 11,000 on the same date.

In a sense, it's one big company with many semi-independent units. So, they're independent, but they always cooperate with each other when needed.

Back to Top
louissr View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper
Avatar

Joined: April/15/2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 18
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote louissr Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September/19/2007 at 16:35
As an owner of 1 Zeiss, 3 S&Bs and a Steiner, I think we are getting into really subtle differences.
I love my S&Bs (4-16 PHs), they always work and appear to be built like a T-34 but with the precision  of an artificial heart, but the 3-9 Zeiss is lighter and the Steiner 2-8 a great rugged big game scope (albeit discontinued)
All that said, in real world North American hunting almost any $500 or more scope will serve our needs just fine.
Spend the big bucks on the binocs and spotting scope if you must prioritize as you'll spend a lot more time looking thru them. If you got the bucks then get that euro scope as you will be happy.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.01
Copyright ©2001-2018 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.203 seconds.