Visit the SWFA.com site to check out our current specials. |
Kahles or Conquest decision |
Post Reply |
Author | ||
Lobber
Optics GrassHopper Joined: May/28/2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 11 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: May/28/2007 at 09:09 |
|
I've finally reached the point where it's time to stop lurking. I just got my 25-06 back from Ruger for it's rebarrel and I'm needing some glass. Originally I was just going to go with a 3-9x40 Conquest, but then I got to thinking about how much I really was willing to spend. This was the first center-fire I ever bought, I've had it 20 years now and will own it for the rest of my life so spending a couple hundred more is justified. I'm stuck between the 4.5-14x44 Conquest and the 3-9x42 Kahles AH. So what do you fellas in the peanut gallery suggest? Slightly better optics and build quality in the Kahles, or the higher power of the Conquest.
Oh, this rifle is a sporter weight that's used for rugged terrain mulies...shots can get kinda long, out to 400 yards which is my self-imposed limit.
TIA |
||
Hey guys watch this, see that Prairie Dog waaay out there?
|
||
ronnie
Optics Apprentice Joined: February/15/2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 102 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I think the 4.5x14x44 would be little of an over kill. Kahles would be my pick. |
||
tahqua
MODERATOR Have You Driven A Ford Lately? Joined: March/27/2006 Location: Michigan, USA Status: Offline Points: 9042 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I am biased towards Kahles because I own one. My brother also has both Kahles and Conquest and he prefers Kahles. You would be well served by either one. This might be some useful information: http://opticstalk.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=6260&KW=ah I think a 3-9 is more than powerful enough for any reasonable deer hunting range. Good luck and welcome to O.T. |
||
jkll
Optics Apprentice Joined: January/06/2007 Status: Offline Points: 54 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Check out the JUNE/JULY OUTDOOR LIFE optics test issue. There's some dispute in this forum about it's objectivity,but it's the closest thing I've seen in a national publication where they actually attempted to review hunting optics. The advertisers always seemed more important than the readers in other publications.It may not be gospel,but at least OUTDOOR LIFE claims to have used scientific instruments to measure resolution and light transmission. After seeing the tests,you may not want to spend the extra money on KAHLES or ZEISS CONQUEST!
|
||
ronnie
Optics Apprentice Joined: February/15/2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 102 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
jkll i went to outdoor life but couldnt find the article your talking about but i did check out some optic reviews they did in the past and after what they found i dont believe it.they tested a kahles and S and B and claim they did poorly in lowlight situations where some fairly inexpensive scopes did very well.sorry just dont believe that.i dont think i will be putting much trust in there reviews.
Lobber either the conquest or kahles will serve you fine. Kahles AH is the best between the two. |
||
RifleDude
MODERATOR EVIL OPPRESSOR Joined: October/13/2006 Location: Texas Status: Offline Points: 16337 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Welcome, Lobber!
I personally think the Kahles scopes I've used were optically superior to the Zeiss Conquest to a noticeable degree (at least to my eyes), but both are very good, and I suspect there's some subjectivity involved. However, I think it's worth noting that among OT members who've owned/used both the Kahles and Conquest, I've never heard from anyone who thought the Conquest was superior to the Kahles, yet several that have had the opposite opinion.
I place almost zero value on the Outdoor Life reviews, based on numerous inconsistencies and just plain bogus info they've given in the past. Even though there will always be some dispute among different testers based on different test protocols, I own or have owned several of the scopes they tested and in head to head comparisons, I draw entirely different conclusions than they do to my eyes. Then, there have been a couple other so-called "scientifically" conducted tests I've seen that directly dispute the OL results. I don't believe a standardized testing protocol has been developed for comparing optical performance, or at least if one has, I've never seen it. Therefore, I would take any of these magazine reviews with a grain of salt. |
||
Ted
Money can't buy happiness... but it's much more comfortable to cry in a Porsche than on a bicycle. |
||
ranburr
Optics Master Joined: May/16/2004 Status: Offline Points: 1082 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I would get a Conquest in 3-9x40. I don't see a significant improvement in the Kahles line unless you step up to the CL multi-zero offering.
ranburr |
||
jonbravado
Optics Master Joined: October/05/2006 Status: Offline Points: 1131 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
kahles KX would be a wonderful choice for just a little more money -
they have excellent optics and reticles.
it will beat a conquest, handsdown.
J |
||
ceylonc
Optics Journeyman Joined: September/13/2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 514 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I haven't been able to find this article. What does OL recommend the reader buy?
I'm with RifleDude on this one as well. I've read quite a few of their review on scopes that made me wonder what they were looking through? I am very familiar with the two scopes you're considering & my eyes tell me that you're going to be spending in excess of $1,100 to do better than the Kahles. The Conquest is excellent and certainly no slouch but not quite as good as the Kahles.
**EDIT-- I did find an OL review from 4/07 on their website. They indicated that they preferred a CABELLAS OUTFITTER 4X12 40MM over a Kahles AH 305x10 50mm!!!!! Said they were disappointed with resolution & low light performance with the Kahles but gave the $400 Cabellas scope a "Great Buy" rating... Whatever!
Edited by ceylonc |
||
silver
Optics Master Joined: November/04/2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 2291 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Ruger barrel? Before I'd drop a ton of money, I'd see how it shoots. If it does not beat 1 moa, then you have your answer.
|
||
"If we weren't all crazy we, We would go insane." Jimmie Buffet
WWW.formitch.com |
||
Rancid Coolaid
MODERATOR Joined: January/19/2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 9318 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I own a few Conquests and like them; however, I would say the Kahles is the better optic (I didn't buy them because I have unique requirements and Kahles didn't fit them.)
Both will serve you well for many years to come. I really like the Zeiss and have nothing but good things to say - but i do notice a slight difference when compared to the equal Kahles (the newer, not tht older American Hunter.) |
||
Freedom is something you take.
Respect is something you earn. Equality is something you whine about not being given. |
||
Dale Clifford
Optics Jedi Knight Joined: July/04/2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 5087 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
had 4.5x14 conquest, and wasn/t impressed in the least, never looked thru the Kahles, but I'm sure it's better, Use a 2.5x10x50 diavari as a beater on semi autos, built well, but the tunnel effect on lower powers suck. Silver has it, see if the barrel is any good, before making serious decisions, you may want to look at barska
|
||
tahqua
MODERATOR Have You Driven A Ford Lately? Joined: March/27/2006 Location: Michigan, USA Status: Offline Points: 9042 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
|
||
jkll
Optics Apprentice Joined: January/06/2007 Status: Offline Points: 54 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
|
||
tahqua
MODERATOR Have You Driven A Ford Lately? Joined: March/27/2006 Location: Michigan, USA Status: Offline Points: 9042 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I own Elite glass and it doesn't compare to Kahles except for being easier on the pocket book.
Sightron Big Sky I know nothing about. As for Outdoor Life, I am a subscriber but I don't necessarily subscribe to their They have to appeal to a very broad audience and opinions vary. I will take the opinions of most the folks here at O.T. in a second any day of the week. Lastly, the poster asked about Conquest versus Kahles. |
||
Lobber
Optics GrassHopper Joined: May/28/2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 11 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Hey now fellas, if you keep poking fun it's possible you might hurt my one feeling.
|
||
Hey guys watch this, see that Prairie Dog waaay out there?
|
||
Lobber
Optics GrassHopper Joined: May/28/2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 11 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I spent some time behind some Kahles scopes the last time I was in Denmark hunting with my womans brother. I bled really bad....the only time my eyebrow was ever clobbered. Did I forget to mention that I bled really bad? Wanna know the icing on the cake? After I got the bleeding stopped and the red stag loaded we went back to the BILs factory, this factory http://www.schultzlarsen.com/ yep, the only gun manufacturer in DK. I spent the next 3 weeks being greeted with hysterical laughter and the nickname "scoob-eye" BTW, stay away from the 9.3x62 round, it can be rather unfriendly.
I'm going to grab the Kahles, if not for anything more than sentimental reasons.
|
||
Hey guys watch this, see that Prairie Dog waaay out there?
|
||
tahqua
MODERATOR Have You Driven A Ford Lately? Joined: March/27/2006 Location: Michigan, USA Status: Offline Points: 9042 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
If you get some time, post some picks of your stick once you get it outfitted. It should be a dandy, nice caliber choice, too.
|
||
Triple S
Optics GrassHopper Joined: May/08/2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 9 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I put the 4.5-14x44 Conquest on a Ruger #1 in .25-06 and am very pleased with it. The scope is clear, adjusts well, and looks great! It seems like the perfect match with my rifle for 400 plus yard shots!
|
||
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |