Visit the SWFA.com site to check out our current specials. |
THE RIFLE BARREL |
Post Reply | Page 123> |
Author | ||
hot30
Optics Journeyman Joined: December/27/2006 Status: Offline Points: 378 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: January/27/2007 at 00:17 |
|
take your rifle barrel, any caliber and 26" long.. have it fluted or a 1" BULL or a straight taper, in the harmonics syndrome, which has less, which is more rigid, which sinks heat better... It doesnt matter what its used for, which barrel does it better.?? does fluting perform the functions that they state, better cooling and more rigid..? Is a BULL barrel the ultamit heat sink.? Could just "one" barrel be the ultamit configuration..? Who has the ultamit rifle barrel out there??
30 |
||
30
|
||
Dolphin
Optics Master Joined: October/05/2006 Location: North Carolina Status: Offline Points: 1795 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
good question. The flutes increase surface area for heat dissipation, as I am sure you know, but when it comes to harmonics, it depends on the caliber and the charge, as well as what the barrel is made of and how well the barrel is made and to what specifications. Two identical barrels, bedded in two different ways, will exhibit 2 different set of harmonics, all other things, being equal. Now, to the degree it affects the accuracy, is another story. So, the answer to your question is, it all depends. For hunting, again as I am sure you know, medium contour barrels or less make more sense to lighten the load and if it is a magnum, I prefer flutes, to further lighten the load and dissipate the heat, but even the latter is not necessary, if it is a pure hunter. For competition shooting, which I do not do, obviously, again as you know, the other side of the spectrum is more important. Hope this helps.
|
||
Anthony
Optics Apprentice Joined: June/01/2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 223 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I don't have the ultimate rifle barrel, but I can tell you that a non-fluted bull barrel dosent dissipate or "sink" heat, as fast as a thinner say #1 contour barrel. However it will take more rounds to heat up a bull barrel than the #1 but once it's hot it's going to take longer to cool down. A fluted barrel has more surface area than a flat bull barrel, so it will cool down a little bit faster. I don't know if it straitens it, it seems like it might, if you think about it....
I hope you find this useful |
||
Anthony
Optics Apprentice Joined: June/01/2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 223 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
whoa, you beat me to the first reply by seconds...
|
||
tahqua
MODERATOR Have You Driven A Ford Lately? Joined: March/27/2006 Location: Michigan, USA Status: Offline Points: 9042 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Interesting reading on this very subject. http://www.varmintal.com/aflut.htm This guy is good........... |
||
RifleDude
MODERATOR EVIL OPPRESSOR Joined: October/13/2006 Location: Texas Status: Offline Points: 16337 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
30,
Fluting makes the barrel lighter and theoretically dissipates heat faster, but the difference in heat dissipation is so minimal that it's not worth worrying about. Mainly the advantage is it does reduce weight, and it looks cool. As for rigidity, a fluted barrel is more rigid than an unfluted barrel of the same WEIGHT, but an unfluted barrel of the same DIAMETER is more rigid than a fluted barrel. Anytime you remove material, you reduce rigidity. Also, when flutes are cut in a barrel, it can cause stress-relieving of the steel, which can cause the whole barrel, meaning the bore as well, to move, grow, warp, etc. such that the bore often isn't quite as straight and uniform as it was with more material on the o.d. |
||
Ted
Money can't buy happiness... but it's much more comfortable to cry in a Porsche than on a bicycle. |
||
RifleDude
MODERATOR EVIL OPPRESSOR Joined: October/13/2006 Location: Texas Status: Offline Points: 16337 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
As for harmonics, yes, it changes the harmonic signature (generally
lowers the frequency of the sine wave) of the barrel. Anytime you
remove material, you change the barrel's harmonics. It's the same
principle a barrel tuner works on. Whether or not the harmonic change
will improve or hurt accuracy varies with the rifle and load
combination on a case-by-case basis. Or, it may have no effect on
accuracy. You still have to tune your loads to the gun.
|
||
Ted
Money can't buy happiness... but it's much more comfortable to cry in a Porsche than on a bicycle. |
||
tahqua
MODERATOR Have You Driven A Ford Lately? Joined: March/27/2006 Location: Michigan, USA Status: Offline Points: 9042 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Dolphin brings up a valid point when regarding the barrel as part of a system. Looking at the barrel alone is one thing and is easier to control by itself. Add action and bedding and we now have a system. But if we reduce vibration in the barrel we can reduce it in the system which is in effect an assembly. When I get to a machine with Basic I will try Varmint Al's program. This guy is really good and he has a link for SWFA to boot.
|
||
Dale Clifford
Optics Jedi Knight Joined: July/04/2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 5087 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
If you want to dig deeper in the area--just a suggestion-- Use Matlabs PDE toolbox and you will be able to vary the parameters more --- additionally get Ohlers ballistic tools with the pressure gauges and build the data to put in your Matlab model PDE kit. Fluting suggests your already using a good tube internally, which may or may not be the case. The loads still have to be tuned to the gun., |
||
tahqua
MODERATOR Have You Driven A Ford Lately? Joined: March/27/2006 Location: Michigan, USA Status: Offline Points: 9042 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Dale, I'm running R2006a right now and can't get it to work. Have you tried Varmint Al's program? Any tips would be great............thanks
|
||
Dale Clifford
Optics Jedi Knight Joined: July/04/2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 5087 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
give me 24hr.
|
||
tahqua
MODERATOR Have You Driven A Ford Lately? Joined: March/27/2006 Location: Michigan, USA Status: Offline Points: 9042 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
No rush, after I leave today I won't have Matlab until Monday. Then it's still no rush, I still would like to run it though. Thanks |
||
Dolphin
Optics Master Joined: October/05/2006 Location: North Carolina Status: Offline Points: 1795 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Tahqua, I agree, but running equations through a program to solve partial differential equations maybe helpful on an intellectual scale, but as you previously stated, the rifle is to be considered as an unit and the unit ultimately has to be analyzed. Unfortunately, trial and error are the only ways to test what combination is going to work the best, of course based on previous knowledge of barrel combinations, stocks, types of bedding, calibers being used, loads, etc, as I am sure you well know and that I am preaching to the choir, with your background in mechanical engineering. The only reason I state this, is that for others who have no knowledge of the program or solving differential equations with multiple unknowns is a daunting subject and that for the average forum poster needs to be clarified. No offense is intended and your intellectual pursuits are well understood. Edited by Dolphin |
||
hot30
Optics Journeyman Joined: December/27/2006 Status: Offline Points: 378 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
If the barrel, being part of the "system" was entirely "free-floating", leaving as much of the system out of the equation, except for its anchor point(receiver), would a Bull vrs a sporter taper suffer more( im going to use a very simple term here) WHIP during bullet travel..Would you all feel that if this "whip"was managed properly, that barrel life could be extended and tayloring your ammo would play a major role in the control of harmonics..? Ultamitly Im trying to realize if the "bull" vrs the straight-taper would "control" or be controlled more effectively.. (taper being a heavy varmint) Is there a mechanical "advantage" to overcome whip in this taper vrs. a straight cylinder (bull).. Ive been scratching my head awhile on this one, I tend to dwell quite deeply on the issue..might be making it more diffacult than needs to be !!! Some how , mechanicly the taper IMO would do the job better NOT POSATIVE , I just keep looking at the "shape" and wondering..
I think Im almost there, just need some-one to throw it on my plate so I can digest it..
THANX, 30 Edited by hot30 |
||
30
|
||
tahqua
MODERATOR Have You Driven A Ford Lately? Joined: March/27/2006 Location: Michigan, USA Status: Offline Points: 9042 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
What I can say without a doubt is that a system is a sum of it's parts. If we remove the barrel from the system, reduce it's effects, i.e. less vibration, the vibration on the system will be reduced. If this seems to be to deep I will gladly take this question off line. But the question, as presented, requires an in depth analysis. Vibrations is an interesting field and I believe that an answer here can be made available to everyone regardless of background. This answer will require some in depth study, though. Bottom line, the thermo part of the initial question is easy-more surface area=more heat dissapation, all things being equal. If we look at a fluted barrel, the assumption is that vibration will be reduced as the distance each wave travels is increased due to more surface area. The more distance that these vibrations travel, the greater the damping effect from the material. That, also, is with all things being equal and neglecting resonance. I have looked at Varmint Al's program and I am very interested in using it, afterall, he is a supporter of SWFA. SWFA has given me the most enjoyable web experience, ever. Enough said. |
||
hot30
Optics Journeyman Joined: December/27/2006 Status: Offline Points: 378 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Tahqua, dont take what im asking as contradictory or negatively.. I am in no-way going against you or your theory, any of you for that matter !! If I read you correctly you are "offended"... Dont be.! If I didnt think this forum couldnt assist me in my quest, "I appologize" and I wouldnt have asked the question in the first place..But I did..!! I contine to ask questions and add information to merely assist those willing to help me in finding my answer..
Reguards, To all of you 30 |
||
30
|
||
Dolphin
Optics Master Joined: October/05/2006 Location: North Carolina Status: Offline Points: 1795 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
As far as barrel life is concerned, I do not think it is going to make a difference, all other things being equal. Internal ballistics dictate an entirely different concern than external ballistics. You can have a 4 inch thick barrel and an over bore caliber that will still limit your barrel life. Now, the fluting will dissipate heat better and the bull barrels, while taking longer to heat, will take longer to cool, the bottom line, is if you are shooting a hot caliber, you have to let the barrel cool before another string of shots. As other threads have shown, barrel life is a matter of question. If you are talking about 0.5 MOA that is one thing, if you are talking about 2 MOA that is another. As a non-competetive shooter, I judge barrel life, by how it will do for hunting purposes. You may want to judge it on another perspective.
|
||
hot30
Optics Journeyman Joined: December/27/2006 Status: Offline Points: 378 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Dolphin, what do you think of this "3" groove rifeling stuff.? Some like it because it is supposed to clean up better.. Ive been told that it reduces friction (heat) better than anything goin.. My buddies hunt with it, accuracy appears to be the same as anything else, I know heat isnt the main issue unless your on a PD town half the day, wonder if smooth-bore is a solution.? 120mm
And thank you, 30 |
||
30
|
||
Dolphin
Optics Master Joined: October/05/2006 Location: North Carolina Status: Offline Points: 1795 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Are you talking about a barrel with only 3 grooves? I have no personal experience with those barrels and have only read the routine forum post regarding people who have used them. It makes sense, that they would clean up easier, only 3 grooves to clean as opposed to 6. Lilja has been making 3 grooved barrels for several years and they claim to have the equivalent accuracy and up to "20%" longer barrel life in the hot 22 caliber varminter rounds. Although, I assume you already know this. Basically, if you plan to shoot a hot round, alot of times, just plan to rebarrel in the future and not worry about the exact number of rounds. Based on all of the above, take your pick and go with it and have fun. |
||
tahqua
MODERATOR Have You Driven A Ford Lately? Joined: March/27/2006 Location: Michigan, USA Status: Offline Points: 9042 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Hi guys, I am not offended at all. I thought you might be getting bored with this. If you check out Varmint Al's web site you will find tons of info. I thought this one page was some of the best information out there pertaining to barrels. I just mentioned going off line with this just in case the interest wasn't there. The initial qusetion from 30 addressed harmonics and that did get my attention. I will try and get that program to run and get back. I hope that you don't consider this a hijack.
|
||
Post Reply | Page 123> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |