Visit the SWFA.com site to check out our current specials. |
Guts or glass? You decide... |
Post Reply | Page 123 4> |
Author | |
guitarman
Optics Apprentice Joined: January/09/2007 Status: Offline Points: 95 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: January/13/2007 at 19:11 |
Ok guys, I realize I am relatively new to this forum, but I want to see what the experts think. I was reading at http://huntshoot.coastangler.com/hunting/printthread.php?t=7 146, and I came across a very good point. It has to do with what you really want out of a rifle scope. One of the points brought up was that if the "glass" is of relatively high quality, then is there a possibility (especially in the $200-$400 range) that the quality of the internal components could be compromised?
I guess one specific circumstance that comes to mind is Leupold. I have never heard anyone have very many bad things to say about the company, and I am STILL debating between the VX-II 4-12x40 and the Monarch UCC 4-12x40. The biggest difference is the availability of a fine reticle in the VX-II 4-12 and not in the 4-12 offered by the Monarch. And let's all face it, the VX-II is a beautiful scope, regardless of its performance. I have gathered it is one of the best values in the Leupold family.
Wisdom would be appreciated! Haha I hope this doesn't get too ugly...
|
|
Dolphin
Optics Master Joined: October/05/2006 Location: North Carolina Status: Offline Points: 1795 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Stay away from Leupold mainly because they are overpriced. The fact that in that mag. range, Nikon does not have a fine cross hair reticle, does not detract from the fact I would buy a Nikon with the Nikoplex reticle, especialy with the sale on the Monarch scopes. The Monarchs out perform the VX-IIs, hands down. The Monarchs compete with the VX-IIIs.
|
|
guitarman
Optics Apprentice Joined: January/09/2007 Status: Offline Points: 95 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Do you mean they out-perform them in terms of light-collection, or what? Sorry, I just have a very difficult time accepting that Leupold builds an overpriced scope. Sure, they might not have 95% light collection, but they are substantially close to it, and they are built to take one heck of a beating. I also find that they get consistently good reviews across the board (at least for the VX-II's), and especially for the 4-12x40AO w/ fine duplex reticle. It seems like a perfect varminting scope... |
|
mwyates
Optics Master Joined: June/15/2004 Location: Texas Status: Offline Points: 1196 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
You'll read a lot here that Leupold is overpriced. I'm one of the few that disagrees, but I'm one of the few that looks for more in a scope than a pretty picture. Get a Leupold if that's what you want: you won't be disappointed. Get a VX III if you can, but if not the VX II is fine; it's the old Vari X III. |
|
guitarman
Optics Apprentice Joined: January/09/2007 Status: Offline Points: 95 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Thank you! I was struggling with this. I would rather have a rugged scope than exceptional light transmission, especially in regard to maintaining POI, FOV, etc. I think Leupold takes this all into consideration rather than using light transmission as a selling point.
|
|
mwyates
Optics Master Joined: June/15/2004 Location: Texas Status: Offline Points: 1196 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
we must have two things in common, guns and guitars.
|
|
guitarman
Optics Apprentice Joined: January/09/2007 Status: Offline Points: 95 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
No kidding? That's kickarse dude. What do you play?
|
|
guitarman
Optics Apprentice Joined: January/09/2007 Status: Offline Points: 95 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I think this article explains the quality of Leupold...http://www.chuckhawks.com/leupold_tour.htm
|
|
pyro6999
Optics Retard OT TITAN Joined: December/22/2006 Location: North Dakota Status: Offline Points: 22034 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
if the vxII is the old varixIII then i got a misprint on my old varixII, when they stopped making the varix series imo it fell apart at leupold, i bought a 3x9 varixII silver for 200 and its twice the scope the vx is and half the price |
|
They call me "Boots"
375H&H Mag: Yeah, it kills stuff "extra dead" 343 we will never forget God Bless Chris Ledoux "good ride cowboy" |
|
guitarman
Optics Apprentice Joined: January/09/2007 Status: Offline Points: 95 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I don't think it ever fell apart at Leupold. I think they have incredible quality control, an amazing warranty, and the best value on the planet. They may not have 95% light transmission, but I would much rather have a scope that will last a lifetime and have pretty close to it. You need to check out this link and see for yourself http://www.chuckhawks.com/leupold_tour.htm. Sorry guys, but I'm going with a Leupold! No matter what happens, they will fix it, and it is VERY doubtful they'll have to anyway.
From what I understand, Nikons warranty is a joke, and they are very reluctant to back it up. I don't feel comfortable with that... |
|
www.technika.nu
Optics Journeyman Joined: August/02/2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 611 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Guitarman
I have owned 6 different Leupolds and I will never own one again unless the rises their quality considerably. They are dark, note very bright, not very brilliant and have poor FOV and a non constant eyerelief.
So regardless of their price I think their scopes are heavaly inferior to others.
If you are buying scope on a budget , try to find a second hand quality scopes in stead.
Regards Technika |
|
guitarman
Optics Apprentice Joined: January/09/2007 Status: Offline Points: 95 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
What would you suggest www.technika.nu?
|
|
www.technika.nu
Optics Journeyman Joined: August/02/2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 611 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
What gun, caliber and use?
Regards Technika |
|
guitarman
Optics Apprentice Joined: January/09/2007 Status: Offline Points: 95 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Remington SPS 700, 22-250, varminting/occasional deer/MUCH target shooting. Nice to have light-collecting abilities, but I won't be too cranky about 5 minutes, if it means a more durable scope. $400 approximate budget.
|
|
www.technika.nu
Optics Journeyman Joined: August/02/2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 611 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Sorry But my knowledge and interests is in european scopes. I have looked through and used a lot of non european scopes always decided to go for european as i not have been enogh satisfied with the other parts of the world. And as it's nice to have up to at least 10-12X on a warmint gun I don't know any high magnification scopes for that price.
I personally would probably stretch the budget up to 600 USD or more and try to find a Zeiss 3-12x56 secondhanded. That way you would have first class optics, great low light possibilitys and acess to Zeiss great Bullet drop compensator.
Regards Technika |
|
guitarman
Optics Apprentice Joined: January/09/2007 Status: Offline Points: 95 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I would LOVE to have a Zeiss, they are flawless, but 56mm is far too large for my tastes, you know?
|
|
cheaptrick
MODERATOR Joined: September/27/2004 Location: South Carolina Status: Offline Points: 20844 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Without being "ugly", I'd like to say this about the VXII's. The VXII is not a real good buy, IMHO.
Here's an example.
http://www.riflescopes.com/products/LEU61285/leupold_4-12x40 _vx-ii_riflescope.htm Here you have a VXII, with a LR reticle and AO. Price..$429.00
http://www.riflescopes.com/products/6546/nikon_4-12x40_monar ch_ucc_riflescope.htm This is a Nikon Monarch, with AO and the new BDC reticle. Price...$286.00
That's a difference of $143.00
Problem is, the Monarch is a better scope OPTICALLY speaking. I have looked through both, as have many others, and have concluded the Monarch's flat-out better in that regard.
The eye relief on the Loopie "seems" better on paper. But, there's almost a 1" difference between the low setting and the highest.
Head positioning becomes a little hinky and uncomfortable, IMO. (I prefer "fixed" eye relief as opposed to variable. Read..Zeiss Conquest) Yes, I'm aware that both scopes have varying eye relief, but the Monarch has less variance. Approximately 1/2". Less travel to get a good sight picture with the Monarch.
The biggest gripe in my AO with Leupolds is the varying eye relief causing cheekweld/head postioning issues. That's what I'm hearing.
So I'd take the Monarch over the VXII every time. Leupold's legendary customer service isn't worth $143.00 and less performance to me.
Standing by for incoming from myates and the Leupoldites......... |
|
If at first you don't secede...try..try again.
|
|
cheaptrick
MODERATOR Joined: September/27/2004 Location: South Carolina Status: Offline Points: 20844 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
BTW. The Monarch's just as tough as the VXII as well.
Out. |
|
If at first you don't secede...try..try again.
|
|
guitarman
Optics Apprentice Joined: January/09/2007 Status: Offline Points: 95 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I appreciate your insight, cheaptrick. But what about Nikon's overseas production? I realize that many of their scopes are great, but there is something to be said for Leupold's perfectionist manufacturing methods. Many of their workers are outdoorsman themselves, and they take a great deal of pride in their work. Also, what is to be said of Nikon's horrid warranty service? I have heard some very disturbing stories, especially the one involving one individual who got a bill of $170 for warranty work (for a Monarch). Leupold will fix your scope if no matter what happens to it. You could decide to run over it with your car and they would replace it at no cost. I think that the quality of their warranty reflects on the long run quality of Leupold scopes. Sure, the glass might not be quite as good as Nikon's, but are the innards of a Nikon as good as a Leupold's? I'm not sure. Is the warranty of a Nikon as good as a Leupold's? Absolutely not. Are Nikon's assembled in the U.S.A.? Nope. I plan on keeping this scope for decades, I want it to last forever.
|
|
cheaptrick
MODERATOR Joined: September/27/2004 Location: South Carolina Status: Offline Points: 20844 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Is the Leupold a TOTALLY, 100% US made product? Nope.
I could care less where my scopes manufactured at, so long as the standard is there, and Nikon's is. Nobody has convinced me that they could tell the difference between a Japanese Nikon and one made in The PI. TO ME..it's a moot point as to WHERE they are put together. Maybe not to you and others and that's cool too.
This whole "I only buy USA built gear" is ridiculous. The very computer sitting before you is loaded with parts from around the world, I would assume also.
Bottom line is this....If you want the VXII, get the VXII. Hell, go the full Monty and get the VXIII. You've obviously convinced your self that it's the better of the two scopes.
Good shooting. Out.
Edited by cheaptrick |
|
If at first you don't secede...try..try again.
|
|
Post Reply | Page 123 4> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |