New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: Tell the Difference
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Tell the Difference

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>
Author
  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
nksmfamjp View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice
Avatar

Joined: January/06/2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 80
  Quote nksmfamjp Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Tell the Difference
    Posted: December/23/2006 at 11:19

I have only used ~$250 to ~$300 binoculars extensively in the field.  I have had mine broken by some helpful children.

 

I have been comparing binoculars, extensively in the store(~75yards max).  I cannot cleaarly see a $1400 differencee between $250 Nikon 8x36 Monarch ATB's and $1700 8x30-44 high end binoculars(Swarovski EL/SLC, Leica, Zeiss, Brunton, etc.)  I feel like there is no difference at all.  Am I blind, or can you help me tell the difference?  What should I be looking for?  I even had a binocular chart at one place and could tell little difference.  About the only thing I could tell was an ever so slight difference in depth of field, but the Nikons were still pretty darn good.  I have even looked into low light and high light parts of the store.  All of this was done as a direct comparison.  Please show me the difference?  . . .or reccomend a deer hunting opthamalogy specialist.

Back to Top
Bird Watcher View Drop Down
Optics Journeyman
Optics Journeyman
Avatar

Joined: August/30/2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 711
  Quote Bird Watcher Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December/23/2006 at 12:20
First of all, I think that you probably fall into that large percentage of consumers who experience the very same thing, when comparing binocular optics inside of a store, under artifical lighting. (Looking through optics, inside a building, has very limited value.)

Binoculars need to be tested outdoors, as no one purchases them to use inside a building. (Indoor testing would have to be quite extensive and varied, and retail businesses are not set up to provide such things.)

Binoculars should be compared/tested under cloudy skies, at dawn and at dusk, and into the darkness, as these are the types of conditions that they will be used for, in the field. This is when you WILL begin to SEE the differences between optical glass, optical coatings, differences in prism types and prism sizes, and the differences between objective apertures from 30-44mm that you mentioned.

I really don't know how many retail stores have an outdoor area for their customers to test optics, but, I am guessing that they are few and far between.

This is why it is important to have Optics Talk Forums where you can do some additional homework and have your questions answered by experienced consumers. The people on this forum have tons of knowledge to share with you.

Another thing that I personally find very helpful is the individual manufacturers specifications sheets, in their catalogs. Or, going to different manufacturers web-sites where I can read as much as possible about the different models that I am interested in. This type of information COMBINED with everything else will help us to make more intelligent choices.

Be patient, as it takes alittle time.





Edited by Bird Watcher
Back to Top
nksmfamjp View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice
Avatar

Joined: January/06/2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 80
  Quote nksmfamjp Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December/24/2006 at 09:27

Well, it is morning here and I have been comparing binoculars again.  I have compared my dad's 10 x 50 Pentax Porros ~$300 10 years ago to his Leupold Wind River reverse porro 8 x 23?? binoculars.  The 10 x 50's are much brighter, but I would guess that is mostly exit pupil related.

 

Mid day, these 2 bino's represent similar performance.

 

I guess I could buy the the most reasonabley priced of the high dollar bino's and a pair of $300 8 x 42 Nikon's to compare, but this seems unnecessary, isn't it?  I could also try them outside, maybe. . .but usually these sportings goods stores don't want to mess around unless you are buying today.

 

One thing which can be tested in the store is light handling.  There is lots of stray light in the store.  That strong stray light killed a pair of Steiner 8x30 Predator's that I was looking through.  There were bloches all over caused by light bouncing around.

 

I also was looking from a well lit area into a dark inside of a tent.  The Nikon 8x42 Monarch, 8x36 Monarch  and 8x30 Swaro SLC's all performed about equal.

 

The end of all this has left me confused.

 

Basically, I'm trying to decide if I get the larger Nikon 8x42 as an all purpose bino, or if I get the Nikon 8x36 as a usable compact until I can get the money together for a "big three" $1500ish bino.  I'm basically limited to <$300 at this point.  

Back to Top
Bird Watcher View Drop Down
Optics Journeyman
Optics Journeyman
Avatar

Joined: August/30/2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 711
  Quote Bird Watcher Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December/24/2006 at 15:17
I am going to recommend the Luepold Cascades 8x42mm Internal Focus Porro Prism binocular. These run around $275 on the internet.

Others who have purchased the Cascades say that they are bright and sharp and have outstanding low-light performance.

The purpose of the objective lens is to gather incoming light. The larger the objective's diameter the more light the binocular gathers. So, it is not just the exit pupil alone that produces the brightness. Brightness is also influenced by the optical coatings and the type of prisms used.

If you have time, you could go to www.cloudynights.com and at the upper left side of the home page you will see the heading cn reports, click on that and scroll down the page until you see CN Report: Nikon Action Extremes. It would be a good report for you to read.

Back to Top
Acenturian View Drop Down
Optics Journeyman
Optics Journeyman
Avatar

Joined: September/07/2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 532
  Quote Acenturian Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December/24/2006 at 17:41

NOt to repeat what Bird Watcher said, but testing in a store under artifical light is not a true relection of what the bino's are capable of.  I will go as far as to say that on nice crystal clear days you will not see a huge difference between a $300 and a $1,000 pair. I know this because I have two hunting buddies that hunt with Zeiss and another hunts with Leica. When I compared them to my $450 pair of Weaver Grand Slams on a nice clear blue bird day I kept thinking to myself "I can't see much difference at all, and sure not another $600 (Plus) in performance. Personally, thought they really wasted their money.

 

Ok, fast forward we started hunting in horrible weather rain, snow (lots of snow) then a sunny break. When the sun broke the Weavers had a great deal of Chromatic distortion because of the white snow reflection. It was bad. When I looked through their high end stuff the difference now was now very pronounced. I went home and started saving.

 

Now that is not to say that a $300 pair of binoculars are bad, in fact quite the opposite. I think the difference between the $300 Leupold Cascades, Nikon Monrachs, Bushnell Legends, Carson XM's and Pentax DCF HRII and the $49.99 drug store special is going to be HUGE.  As the price goes up the gap gets smaller for performance. Many hunters are well served with this level of glass. Infact I'll be the first to tell someone who is used to the $49.99 special to go buy a decent entry level quality glass they will never regret it.

 

When your buying binoculars from the BIG Three (Zeiss, Leica, Swarovski) and I'll through in Leupold Golden Ring, Bushnell Elites, Nikon Premier Series, Kahles, Minox HG basically high end stuff your paying for piece of mind and for those times when on a hunt or out bird watching when things get really bad and nasty (low light horrible weather conditions) you have the best optics available, which is really important especially if your behind them for hours on end.   Like I said I used to think it was a waste of money till I saw first hand what you pay for.  Also, its like I told family members that thought I was crazy, "if you think a $1400 is expensive for binoculars try paying for a guided hunt in Alaska or Africa and go with cheap glass, now you spent all that money to get there and you may not see a thing". OR perhaps even worse your out hunting in your favorite area and MR. Trophy (Elk , Deer, ect...) goes by just as the sun is setting or rising and you can't make out the animal because of bad glass. 

 

Plus, the BIG 3 are known (as well as Leupold) for taking very good care of their customers. I can't remember what one of the BIG 3 it was, but I heard a story of a guy who was on a hunt in Alaska and going from bigger plane to smaller plane his binoculars got broke. Now here he is on a guided hunt already in Alaska and now no binoculars.  He calls the company (again not sure which one of the three) they tell him where the nearest store is that carries the same bino's and that they will call ahead and the store will be expecting the hunter,  go in hand them the broken pair and they will hand you a new pair and enjoy your hunt.   That to me is WELL worth the money.

 

On that note in your price range, I've handled the Leupold mentioned (I think or it may have been the Olympic) either way I was very impressed with the binoculars so I'll second the above post. Also, I had a pair (sold them to buy the Weavers) Carson Xm series they were fantasic glass and well above their price range in performance. Just a consideration. Below is a great link to a review of the Carsons.

http://www.naturephotographers.net/articles0404/je0404-1.htm l

Those are the same pair I had, I have been told that Carson now has the XM series HD (High definition) which is supposed to be even better. I took a chance buying these from a pretty much unknown company but they were very friendly the glass is top notch in its price range and they come with about the best warranty out there.

 

Happy Holidays

AC

If You're In A Fair Fight, You Didn't Plan It Properly
- Anonymous
Back to Top
nksmfamjp View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice
Avatar

Joined: January/06/2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 80
  Quote nksmfamjp Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December/25/2006 at 09:16

OK, so I've combed the internet and have come up with these bino's.  I'll probably be buying sight unseen because many of these are hard to find locally.  Really locally, 90% of the bino's are blister pack quality!  Any reccomendations from these?

 

1.  Bushnell/Bausch and Lomb Discoverer 7x42 Binoculars(614207)

2.  Pentax DCF WP II 8x42 Waterproof Roof Prism Binoculars(62551)

3.  Swift 8.5x44mm BWCF Audubon Birder Waterproof Binoculars(820)

4.  Leupold Cascades 8x42mm Internal Focus Porro Prism Binoculars(60992)

5.  Nikon Monarch ATB 8x42 Waterproof Binoculars(7430)

6.  Nikon 8x36 Monarch ATB Binoculars(7513)

 

Also, how is Cambridge World to deal with?

Back to Top
Bird Watcher View Drop Down
Optics Journeyman
Optics Journeyman
Avatar

Joined: August/30/2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 711
  Quote Bird Watcher Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December/25/2006 at 12:48
Excellent choices:

1) Pentax DCF WP II 8x42

2) Bushnell Discoverer 7x42

3) Leupold Cascades 8x42 Internal Focus Porro

You really picked some very good binoculars and I would narrow them down to these three, based upon past performance and overall satisfaction.

I like the Swift Audubon 8.5x44 but if my memory serves me correctly there were some past complaints about waterproofing, and also, I think that there is an ED version that has better optics.

If you have time take a look at the Minox BD 8x44 BP porro prism binocular. www.minox.com



Edited by Bird Watcher
Back to Top
Acenturian View Drop Down
Optics Journeyman
Optics Journeyman
Avatar

Joined: September/07/2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 532
  Quote Acenturian Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December/25/2006 at 15:02

Out of all of the class your looking at the Swift Audubon will be the best.  As far as water proofing well I wouldn't use them scuba diving but I've had my ED pair out in the rain and my Dad has the non-ed glass in the rain and they were fine.  The only concern with the Swifts is eye relief.  Besides great glass they have a wonderful huge field of view.  If you wear glasses you will loose out on some of that because the eye relief is pretty short.

 

I've also heard very good things about the Minox Poro's so that would be worth a look. Also if you hunt around and can find the Baush & Lomb Discoverer Poro's I bought those last Christmas for my father in law and they to are water proof and very nice glass. However, they have been discontinued so you really have to do a internet search. When they were new they ran around $400 but last year Cabelas had them on closeout at $170.

 

AC

If You're In A Fair Fight, You Didn't Plan It Properly
- Anonymous
Back to Top
Bird Watcher View Drop Down
Optics Journeyman
Optics Journeyman
Avatar

Joined: August/30/2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 711
  Quote Bird Watcher Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December/25/2006 at 17:54
AC,

Thanks for your help with the Swift's. It's good to know that the problem was not throughout the entire line. I've heard good things about them (probably from you on another thread) and I like both the 44mm and the ED glass.

It would be great to be able to find some Bushnell Discoverers, TODAY, for $170.


Edited by Bird Watcher
Back to Top
nksmfamjp View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice
Avatar

Joined: January/06/2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 80
  Quote nksmfamjp Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December/25/2006 at 18:26

I really want to say, thanks for your help on this even though this post has gone round and round.  I think I have some good direction.

 

BTW, were the Swift's that leaked the current 820's?  Also, what did Swift do to support this issue? 

Back to Top
Tero View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice
Avatar

Joined: December/04/2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 135
  Quote Tero Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December/25/2006 at 18:46
The Nikons Monarch at 36mm and 42 mm will be very similar. If you want more brightness, go for 42, if more FOV, go for 36.

Consider yourdelf lucky that you could not tell the difference. Now you do not have to spend 1400.
Back to Top
Bird Watcher View Drop Down
Optics Journeyman
Optics Journeyman
Avatar

Joined: August/30/2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 711
  Quote Bird Watcher Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December/25/2006 at 20:09
I think it was koshkin that put out the warning about consumer complaints around the Swift binoculars and waterproofing problems.

You could either try and send him a PM, or, contact Swift by e-mail, and see what they are willing to share with you.



Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.109 seconds.