Visit the SWFA.com site to check out our current specials. |
30mm vs. 1" |
Post Reply |
Author | |
jbroadnax
Optics GrassHopper Joined: January/04/2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 10 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: November/27/2006 at 11:44 |
How much difference if any in Light filtering can once expect between and 30mm and 1" Rifle scope. I know there is more adjustment in windage with a 30mm but how much better is it in low light condtions?
I have a Swarovski AV 4x12x50. I am contemplating a 4x16x50 PV. Will the PV be worth the extra money interms of low light, and or long range shooting? IS IT A 500.00 BETTER SCOPE? |
|
jbroadnax
|
|
koshkin
MODERATOR Dark Lord of Optics Joined: June/15/2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 13182 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Assuming the same optical quaity there is no difference whatsoever in light transmission between 30mm and 1" scopes.
Here is the link with some information: http://opticstalk.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=2169&PN=1 ILya |
|
Chris Farris
TEAM SWFA - Admin swfa.com Joined: October/01/2003 Location: Texas Status: Offline Points: 8024 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Swarovski uses the same glass and coatings in their one inch and 30mm scopes. They have the same resolution and light transmission. The extra money for the Pro-Hunter is because of the exchange rate (Euro vs. Dollar), 20% import duty on scopes from Austria, higher wages, recoiling eye cup, gold coil spring holding the reticle.
The 1" Swarovski are assembled in the USA from imported components (no 20% duty), we work cheaper than the Austrians too.
Zeiss 30mm scopes are much brighter and have much greater resolution when compared to their 1" line however because they are two totally different scopes (glass, coatings, everything).
The Swarovski American Lightweight scopes are the best value in ultra high end optics....by far.
Check the SampleList.com for some really good deals. My favorite is the 4-12x50 TDS. |
|
tahqua
MODERATOR Have You Driven A Ford Lately? Joined: March/27/2006 Location: Michigan, USA Status: Offline Points: 9042 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Too bad they don't make a 1.5-5 or 2-7 American as this information is really new to me regarding glass and coatings. Chris does the same apply for the Kahles? Your discussion on the 1.1-4 Helia for your big game gun was really good news, too. $699 on the Sample List, hmmmm, maybe the Kahles American doesn't matter anyway.
|
|
Dolphin
Optics Master Joined: October/05/2006 Location: North Carolina Status: Offline Points: 1795 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
correct me if I am wrong. But, I thought I heard Chris say the Swarovski scopes had painted reticles. Regardless, the law of La Place state that the wider the diameter of an object the greater the tension and therefore the weaker the tube, unless it is thicker. Therefore, I have always been suspect of 30mm scopes as being stronger and more rugged. Do these euro-makers state how thick the scope walls are, compared to other scope makers. The analogy for persons not familiar with this law of physics, is that a small bird egg is more rugged, as compared to a larger egg. Just curious, because I do not own and cannot afford these euro scopes.
|
|
koshkin
MODERATOR Dark Lord of Optics Joined: June/15/2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 13182 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
If memory serves me right, Laplace's law refers to the tension in the walls of the tube as a result of internal pressure. Since I do not think the scope has a very high chance of being warped from internal pressure, I am not sure how applicable Laplace's law is.
Generally, it is not entirely clear what is meant by "scope tube strength". There are all sort of mechanical stresses that are all a bit different and depend on a number of parameters. I suspect that, largely, people are referring to tube stiffness. If that is the case, a larger diameter tube of the same wall thickness will be stiffer (until there is a catastrophic material collapse of one of the walls). In other words, it will be a little easier to break, but harder to bend. Whether European manufacturers truly use walls or not is hard to say offhand. I just looked at comparative weights of 30mm and 1" scopes from Burris and Leupold and my guess would be that the wall thickness is about the same between of 1" and 30mm models (comparing Leupy to Leupy and Burris to Burris). Whether Europeans use thicker is not easy to determine since most of the wieght in a scope comes from glass, so the weight contribution of a slightly thicker tube is difficult to reverse engineer. ILya |
|
Dolphin
Optics Master Joined: October/05/2006 Location: North Carolina Status: Offline Points: 1795 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
While, it is true that the law of LaPlace is usually applied to objects with changing internal pressures, the same concept applies, to any object with a fixed internal pressure. The greater the radius of that object, the greater the tension and the less force required for external pressure to damage said object. The only reason I bring the subject up, is that many people use the reason for buying a 30mm tube is because they are more rugged. I only own one and do not even have it mounted on a rifle, so I don't have any personal experirence. Just a question, from a different standpoint and wondering whether they are more rugged, from people who have more experience than myself.
|
|
Chris Farris
TEAM SWFA - Admin swfa.com Joined: October/01/2003 Location: Texas Status: Offline Points: 8024 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Yes the same is true with Kahles. In fact I am in the process of switching my American Lightweight Swarovskis with Kahles CL 1" scopes. Kahles is the world's oldest scope manufacturer; they were purchased by Swarovski when the last Kahles passed away with no heir. Swarovski immediately started branding the Kahles scopes with their name and kind of treated Kahles like a step child for many years. The resentment grew and grew because all of Kahles' hard work and ideas were being used under the Swarovski name and the Kahles brand was positioned by Swarovski to be a lower line. Kahles finally just stopped sharing, basically and two years ago were able to break free and operate on their own with no technologies being shared either direction. Kahles formed their own rep groups and price list, making them completely independent. This is why you don't see the TDS reticle on Kahles scopes any longer as it was a Swarovski acquisition from Well, come to find out Kahles had not really stopped their design and engineering they just kept everything top secret and hidden. So once the board of directors agreed to the split and all the details were done, Kahles phased out their existing lines and started production of the CL, CSX, CB, etc. The CSX illuminated technology is easily the best and most advanced in the world. The ground breaking Multizero turret with the micro-clutch assembly is amazing. The CL 1" scopes have a huge ocular that provides a wide field of view, long eye relief and a easy to find sight picture. New coatings and glass are also being used. When you get to this level of optics, there are many things that make one scope better than another (not just optics), Kahles is the "real deal" and in my opinion they currently make the finest scope money can buy. Keep in mind that scopes are pretty much all that Kahles does (99%) and they have been doing it longer than anyone. They devote all of their resources to scope development not rangefinders, spotting scopes, mounts, cameras, projectors, microscopes, telescopes, crystal, etc. World wide Kahles is a much larger brand, the U.S. market has yet to realize how good they really are, but their time is coming......its just taken over 100 years. >>>Read more about the history of Kahles<<<
|
|
Chris Farris
TEAM SWFA - Admin swfa.com Joined: October/01/2003 Location: Texas Status: Offline Points: 8024 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
In regards to the tube strength debate. Here's my humble two cents worth. It does not really matter. Catastrophic tube failure is not even a measurable portion of scope failures. If your scope's tube gets bent or damaged to the extent that it effects the function of the scope I think you would have bigger problems to worry about, like does the firearm it is attached to still function or do you still function. It would take quite a fall to damage the main tube of a quality hunting scope. Keep in mind the law of leverage (if there is one). You scope is mounted in a set of rings spaced apart and clamped down securely segregating the scope into four parts and shielding a large portion of the main tube itself. The rings themselves make it very difficult to bend or damage the main tube.
I can only recall one instance of main tube failure, make it two. One was when the UPS truck ran over one of our boxes and the other was from someone using an extremely long 6-24 to turn in a stubborn set of Redfield rings. |
|
koshkin
MODERATOR Dark Lord of Optics Joined: June/15/2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 13182 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
For the most part you are correct. Any quality manufacturer takes this into account and we do not need to worry about tueb strength. I have however seen bent tubes due to improper mounting with windage adjustable rings and due to impact. ILya |
|
Tip69
Optics Master Extraordinaire Tip Stick Joined: September/27/2005 Location: Nebraska Status: Offline Points: 4155 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Chris,
I was looking at the samplelist and I just don't know much about Kahles....... can you kind of explain what the difference is between the different names..... i.e. Helia CL vs European vs European Helia C vs CL (the new redesigned and improved Kahles) I suspect there are some that are quite a bit better than others.
Thanks, |
|
take em!
|
|
Chris Farris
TEAM SWFA - Admin swfa.com Joined: October/01/2003 Location: Texas Status: Offline Points: 8024 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I cleaned it up a little. The reason it was not consistant was our fault. I entered some by looking at the box description and Brady entered some looking at the packing list or price list. Kahles is not real consistent with their model descriptions and we weren't either.
Every scope Kahles makes is called a Helia. There are two basic lines:
CL - 1" C - 30mm
Under the 30mm there are CSX which are illuminated and CS which have the Multizero feature.
The ones that read American Hunter are the old discontinued models. All of the 30mm Kahles we have are the latest models.
You can find more specific details here http://www.kahlesoptik.com/index.php
|
|
tahqua
MODERATOR Have You Driven A Ford Lately? Joined: March/27/2006 Location: Michigan, USA Status: Offline Points: 9042 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Regarding Koshkin's and Dolphin's discussion, I agree that Laplace's Law does not apply because the internal pressure of a scope is low. I have always thought that when discussions about scope tube strength arise it was about resistance to crushing and bending. In this case hoop stress needs to be considered and an increase in diameter does increase the stress, all other things being equal. I have never tried to to prove this. I have fallen hard enough with a Burris 4X to break a turret cover without doing damage to the tube. I sure don't want to try this on my 30mm Kahles, though.
|
|
Dolphin
Optics Master Joined: October/05/2006 Location: North Carolina Status: Offline Points: 1795 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Tension of a cylindrical or spherical object is relative to it's diameter, regardless of whether the internal pressure is changing or fixed. Hence the reason a robin's egg is more resistant to breakage as compared to a chicken's egg. I really did not mean to bring this up as a matter of debate regarding the law of LaPlace, as I know it well, but to understand better whether 30mm tubes are stronger, since I have little experience with them. According to Chris, it seems that tube failure/crushing, in good quality scopes is rare and therefore my questions have been answered. I am sorry to create a thread of discussion, to try to get to the answer of my question. Sorry guys.
|
|
tahqua
MODERATOR Have You Driven A Ford Lately? Joined: March/27/2006 Location: Michigan, USA Status: Offline Points: 9042 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
No need to be sorry, this is fun stuff and good discussion. Like you guys already said, not many bent or crushed tubes out there. l sure like to hear stories about horses and trucks doing their best on them.
|
|
Chris Farris
TEAM SWFA - Admin swfa.com Joined: October/01/2003 Location: Texas Status: Offline Points: 8024 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I agree, plus how are us 'educationally challenged" members supposed to learn about things like LaPlace's Law.
Funny story about that scope the UPS truck ran over is that they refused to pay the insurance on it, claiming "insufficient packaging". We responded with the box that had a tire tread pattern embedded in it and the question, "what kind of packaging would have been sufficient?" They graciously paid up. |
|
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |