Visit the SWFA.com site to check out our current specials. |
8x vs 10x (I know, I know) |
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Author | ||
wesgar
Optics GrassHopper Joined: January/11/2009 Location: NC Status: Offline Points: 22 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: December/22/2016 at 08:42 |
|
I know, it's been asked and answered again and again, but please allow me to clarify. For the sole purpose of judging antlers in poor light, all else being equal (same model from same mfg with same obj. size), does the added magnification of a 10x outweigh the smaller exit pupil of the 10x bino. I realize that the 8x may have some advantages with regards to scanning for game, e.g. wider field of view, less apparent shake, less weight, etc., the question pertains solely to the ability to resolve antlers in failing light.
I have only ever used an 8x bino, a Pentax SP 8 x 43. I love the bino in good light and for finding game, but lose the ability to resolve antlers when the good ones typically come out. I plan to upgrade to better glass and would like some input on the better choice. If it matters, the main contender at this point is a Swaro SLC in 8x42 or 10x42. I of course realize the benefits of a larger objective lens for low light viewing, but I have to carry these things around, so I don't plan to go larger than 42 mm. Thanks.
|
||
Steelbenz
Optics Jedi Knight ROLL TIDE ROLL Joined: January/03/2006 Location: Heart of Dixie Status: Offline Points: 5153 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Okay I'll let you answer your own question! Can you count the horn on the deer with the naked eye from 10 yards away but not 12.5 yards away? Because that's the difference!
|
||
"Don't argue with a fool! From a distance you can't really tell who's who!"
|
||
Rancid Coolaid
MODERATOR Joined: January/19/2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 9318 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
With same glass and same objective size, lower power will be brighter. If this is genuinely a failing light question, the 8X will get you a minute or 2 more usable light time.
But, seeing well enough to identify with an 8X bino is very different from seeing well enough to take a shot in that same light.
|
||
Freedom is something you take.
Respect is something you earn. Equality is something you whine about not being given. |
||
Steelbenz
Optics Jedi Knight ROLL TIDE ROLL Joined: January/03/2006 Location: Heart of Dixie Status: Offline Points: 5153 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
RC is correct that your going to get 1mm more light through the 8x and with a 42mm objective lens it should be a significant difference. 25% more useable light! 10x = 4.2mm 8x = 5.25mm 5.25 - 4.2 = 1.05 1.05 / 4.2 = .25 ergo 25% more light and still below maximum usable. Make me think about helps both of us! I stand corrected! |
||
"Don't argue with a fool! From a distance you can't really tell who's who!"
|
||
jonoMT
Optics Master Extraordinaire Joined: November/13/2008 Location: Montana Status: Offline Points: 4853 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I've had 3-15X scopes with the best glass possible that would out-resolve a cheap spotting scope on 30X. I'd bet on an 8X upgrade over going to 10.
|
||
Reaction time is a factor...
|
||
JGRaider
Optics Master Joined: February/06/2008 Status: Offline Points: 1540 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
The fact is, given the same binocular in 8x42 vs 10x42, the 10x will out resolve the 8x every time, allowing you to see more detail.
|
||
Bitterroot Bulls
Optics Master Extraordinaire Joined: May/07/2009 Location: Montana Status: Offline Points: 3416 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
This is true, and the benefit is greater at greater distances ... until atmospheric disturbance (conditions dependant) interfere. Then the lower magnification has a small advantage, IME. As a western hunter, under most conditions, I prefer 10x (especially tripod-mounted). However, I am content with 8x as well (I like 8X32 for 8x bins).
|
||
-Matt
|
||
WJC
Optics Journeyman Joined: May/28/2014 Location: Twin Falls, ID Status: Offline Points: 328 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Almost all of the answers on binocular forums deal exclusively with the mechanical side of optics. And, considering that, you have been given some reasonable answers. However, there is a physiological side of the matter that is—considered or not—quite weighty. Not only does visual acuity change from person to person, it changes for the SAME person due to a constantly changing set of conditions.
A few years ago, Steiner ran an ad showing a hunter on one knee looking through his Steiner binocular. The headline read "When every second counts." Yet, when EVERY SECOND COUNTS, playing with your binocular is tremendously foolish. In the 8x Vs. 10x comparison, you will find many people who can make a concrete case for either. If it's a high-quality instrument, either will make you happy. Don't over think the matter. You will see more clearly looking through either binocular than you will looking through the debate. 'just Sayin' |
||
“Water, water everywhere nor any drop to drink.” — Samuel Taylor Coleridge
“Social media everywhere but not a thought to think.” — me |
||
mike650
Optics God Joined: May/14/2006 Location: West of Rockies Status: Online Points: 14569 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Another western hunter here, if given the choice I'll take 10x every time.
That's what makes me happy. |
||
“A hunt based only on trophies taken falls far short of what the ultimate goal should be.” – Fred Bear
|
||
supertool73
Optics God Superstool Joined: January/03/2008 Status: Offline Points: 11814 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I like 10x as well. But I do love the compact size of my 8x32s.
|
||
Lifetime warranty and excellent customer service don't mean a thing when your gun fails during a zombie attack.
"A Liberal is a person who will give away everything they don't own." |
||
3_tens
Optics Jedi Master Joined: January/08/2007 Location: Oklahoma Status: Offline Points: 7853 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
|
||
Folks ain't got a sense of humor no more. They don't laugh they just get sore.
Need to follow the rules. Just hard to determine which set of rules to follow Now the rules have changed again. |
||
JGRaider
Optics Master Joined: February/06/2008 Status: Offline Points: 1540 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
It's not misleading at all. I specifically said "same binocular", as in same make and model. You compared Nikon with Leica, not at all what I said.
|
||
3_tens
Optics Jedi Master Joined: January/08/2007 Location: Oklahoma Status: Offline Points: 7853 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I said " could be" because many of today's genera that can't digest a multi faceted thought. They will only read that 10x will out resolve the 8x every time. So often things are taken out of context. The 2x magnification increase will degrade the image quality using the identical same objective lens. Your eye may not see the difference. I know my eye couldn't. Your using "This is a fact" disqualifies your statement. Mathematically it is not a fact. Not even to bring in the 2x magnification of hand shake knowing binoculars are mostly hand held for use.
|
||
Folks ain't got a sense of humor no more. They don't laugh they just get sore.
Need to follow the rules. Just hard to determine which set of rules to follow Now the rules have changed again. |
||
JGRaider
Optics Master Joined: February/06/2008 Status: Offline Points: 1540 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Forget the math. I've done it hundreds of times in the field. That's good enough for me.
|
||
WJC
Optics Journeyman Joined: May/28/2014 Location: Twin Falls, ID Status: Offline Points: 328 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
"Good enough for me" takes us back to the personal physiological aspects of the matter, which rarely enter into it. We all have differing degrees in our thresholds of recognition (clinically: sensory thresholds). Thus, when getting that close to an answer, one is splitting ever-changing hairs with an ax.
|
||
“Water, water everywhere nor any drop to drink.” — Samuel Taylor Coleridge
“Social media everywhere but not a thought to think.” — me |
||
Rancid Coolaid
MODERATOR Joined: January/19/2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 9318 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Forget the math... the earth is flat, I've seen it! Knowing something absolves from the knower any need to think. So awesome. As said before. 8X will be brighter, all other factors being equal. Increased light will give you a few more minutes. When glass, make, model vary, lots of things influence. "Forget the math", so awesome! Edited by Rancid Coolaid - December/23/2016 at 07:47 |
||
Freedom is something you take.
Respect is something you earn. Equality is something you whine about not being given. |
||
JGRaider
Optics Master Joined: February/06/2008 Status: Offline Points: 1540 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Thank you sir, glad I could help you out.
|
||
mike650
Optics God Joined: May/14/2006 Location: West of Rockies Status: Online Points: 14569 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I have 7x42 SLC's that are excellent in low light, very sharp, zero eye strain, etc. etc. but I still fall back to my 10x42 EL's when hunting.
|
||
“A hunt based only on trophies taken falls far short of what the ultimate goal should be.” – Fred Bear
|
||
James@SWFA
TEAM SWFA - Staff Joined: September/28/2015 Location: Midlothian Status: Offline Points: 27 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I personally have a pair of Zeiss 8x42 conquest hd's (http://swfa.com/optics/browse/zeiss-8x42-conquest-hd-binocular.html) and like them a lot. Most of my hunting is done with a lot of brush in the background and low light can get pretty tough sometimes. I've been able to more easily spot game and haven't had many problems counting their horns on the 8x vs 10x powers. I am not as versed on all of the technical jargon or ins and outs with binos, however, I get a chance to look through a lot of them up here and for the money I went with these.
|
||
koshkin
MODERATOR Dark Lord of Optics Joined: June/15/2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 13182 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
A couple of comments: to present the same quality of the image, a 10x42 binocular needs to be a bit better than the 8x42. That sorta come with higher magnification: alignment tolerances are tighter, etc.
Assuming the overall image quality between an 8x and 10x are comparable, and especially if low light is in play, I would suggest you consider a 10x50 instead of the 10x42. Also, there is technique involved, so if you want to use a higher magnification binocular handheld, a little experimentation and careful consideration of fit are important. 10x50 is usually a little heavier and longer which helps keep it steady. The lighter the binocular, the more hand tremor you will see. Same for the length. Longer is typically steadier. Increased exit pupil also helps. When I have to use a binocular handheld, I try to anchor the eyecups on my eye socket bones. That really helps me keep them steady. However, how well I can do that really depends on the size and shape of the eyecups, so I am a bit picky in that regard. Going above 10x handheld is difficult for me (although with any sort of support things change) for any sort of extended glassing. If all I am looking for is a quick glance, I have learned to stabilize myself reasonably well (mostly because I have been testing SWFA's new 12x32 binocular and had to figure it out). ILya |
||
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |