Visit the SWFA.com site to check out our current specials. |
how do other premium scopes compare to the alpha 3 |
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Author | |
atomiclab
Optics Apprentice Joined: November/17/2011 Location: Tx Status: Offline Points: 68 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: December/01/2011 at 21:58 |
I have often wondered how other premium scopes compare optically to the alpha 3
scopes such as: U.S. Optics Valdada Primer Reticles S&B March Night Force This may be a silly question, but, What would be the best optical "bargain" amongst the various premium scope manufacturers (including swaro, leica, zeiss)?
|
|
SVT_Tactical
MODERATOR Chief Sackscratch Joined: December/17/2009 Location: NorthCackalacky Status: Offline Points: 31233 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Define premium and use..... The SS 5-20s have glass that compares to scopes that are priced much higher. They have great reviews and the SS name to back them. They are considered by some to be the best "bang for your buck" in the tactical field currently.
|
|
Stud Duck
Optics Journeyman Joined: May/20/2005 Location: WV Status: Offline Points: 508 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
|
supertool73
Optics God Superstool Joined: January/03/2008 Status: Offline Points: 11814 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I don't have experience with all you have listed, but I do have a Swaro Z6. I have had a bunch of IORs, looked through several USOs, and several Nightforces, during some precision rifle classes i have taken when I was using IORs and SWFA SS scopes. I also have a SS 5-20x.
The Z6 is better glass than them all. IORs and USO looked really close to my eyes, the SS 5-20x is also very similar to the IORs. Then Nightforce comes up last to them all. Optically your best bargain scopes IMO are the SS series followed by IOR. SS has incredible glass for the money it is right there with the IORs for a little less money. |
|
Lifetime warranty and excellent customer service don't mean a thing when your gun fails during a zombie attack.
"A Liberal is a person who will give away everything they don't own." |
|
tahqua
MODERATOR Have You Driven A Ford Lately? Joined: March/27/2006 Location: Michigan, USA Status: Offline Points: 9042 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Of the ones mentioned I have only looked through various IOR, S&B and Night Force. The NF on my friends .300 is a tank. But I can say the S&B I've looked through had excellent glass.
Also missing in the list is Kahles. These scopes are definitely alpha class. I have four of them and put them right there with Diavari. |
|
Doug
|
|
atomiclab
Optics Apprentice Joined: November/17/2011 Location: Tx Status: Offline Points: 68 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
the purpose of my question is to learn more about the "high end" target and tactical long range scopes and how they compare to each other. Mostly how they compare in optical resolution, clarity, apparent sharpness, and personal opinion of those whom have used or reviewed them intended use would be long range target, varmint, and possible big game hunting (hunting with precision rifle) SVT_tactical, i AM also interested in knowing what is the " best bang for the buck " that is also the point of my question. Honestly, I want to know both, peoples opinions of "x" scope has just as good of glass and is much less money... and ect. and I also am interested in hearing peoples experiences with US optics, Valdada, Primer Reticles, March, Night Force. I have read a few comments that NF doesn't exactly have the best optical resolution or clarity. don't know if that is true or not, but I found it interesting. I have read very favorable comments about Valdada IOR. I have read nothing about US Optics, or Primer Reticles. Stud Duck, Im glad you think the Conquest scopes are such a good value. I have spent a lot of time with my 2 Conquest 3-9x40 scopes and of corse they are the the best scopes I have ever had, and most expensive. I did my homework and read forums and I think it paid off well. and by the way I snatched one of them off the samplelist for $299 (i feel like a big winner there) I value you guys experience and opinions here on the forum. and I want to learn much here.
|
|
jonoMT
Optics Master Extraordinaire Joined: November/13/2008 Location: Montana Status: Offline Points: 4853 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
It depends on what you need out of a scope. IMO, Hensoldt (Zeiss), Premier and S&B offer the best (and usually most expensive) combination of optical quality, durability, design features (such as target turrets or zero-stop) and mag range. If glass doesn't matter a whole lot to you, then a NF will unquestionably compete on the rest of those features.
If all you need is really nice glass and you don't feel the need to reliably shoot out past 300-400 yards, you can go with something like the Zeiss Conquest or feel comfortable running an IOR. Kahles and Swaro glass also. If you can live with the mag range, the SS 5-20 has glass a notch below the ones I mentioned above and is an unquestionable bargain. In the past, I might have considered the Vortex Razor HD, but not with the SS around. The Razor is priced too close to a Premier 3-15 LT, which it outweighs by 9-10 oz. The other scope that is a bargain if you are interested in using turrets and a reticle to get out to say 500-600 yards is the SS 3-9. The glass is as good side-by-side to me as that in a NF 2.5-10X32 and it's safe to say it would do most of what I'd expect out of scopes costing 2-3X more. |
|
Reaction time is a factor...
|
|
supertool73
Optics God Superstool Joined: January/03/2008 Status: Offline Points: 11814 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
No, a $2000 scope is more in the ball park of offering maybe 5% better optical quality over a scope in the $1000 price range, if that. Take a Zeiss conquest 3-9x vs a Swaro Z6 1.7-10x. I dare bet there is not a 10% difference (probably less) in optical quality. Sure the Swaro gives a incredible glass amazing edge to edge clarity and is just a joy to look through. But the Conquest is really not that far behind optically in most respects. Using Binos as an example. I have a pair of Cabelas Euro, that I paid $600 for. I recently bought a pair of Leica Geovid HDs they were around $2400. Optically I cannot tell much difference at all. Kind of sad considering it cost so much more. A lot of times with the premium optics you are paying for more than just glass. WIth the Swaro z6 line they offer the 6x erector system which I dare bet is much more complicated and costly design. A lot of scopes that have a high erector ratio tunnel vision badly at the low end. The Z6 does not at all. It offers incredible FOV at 1.7x where scopes like IOR as soon as you get below 4x start to tunnel, so your FOV does not increase once below that point. On Nightforce. The glass is good and they are great scopes. They just don't have glass quite as good as some other higher end scopes. But again that difference is going to be a very low percentage. |
|
Lifetime warranty and excellent customer service don't mean a thing when your gun fails during a zombie attack.
"A Liberal is a person who will give away everything they don't own." |
|
atomiclab
Optics Apprentice Joined: November/17/2011 Location: Tx Status: Offline Points: 68 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
JonoMT actually I think the glass is more important to me than mechanical durability. I would treat such an investment with kid gloves. and I am sure that any of these scopes in this class are durable enough for my needs.
but mechanical has its place for my needs in that I do want to be able to shoot past 500 yards reliably. thats also part of the point of interest in a "premium" scope, or really a long range scope that would suit my needs. Optical clarity and contrast and apparent sharpness are important to me.
|
|
JGRaider
Optics Master Joined: February/06/2008 Status: Offline Points: 1540 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
For big game hunting, the VX3, Conquest, Elite 4200, etc all get you past legal shooting hours/light. The S&B Summit I have will get you a few extra minutes but that's all, and the S&B glass is as good as it gets.
|
|
jonoMT
Optics Master Extraordinaire Joined: November/13/2008 Location: Montana Status: Offline Points: 4853 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
The thing I've noticed most from alpha glass is the resolution (clarity) and lack of eye fatigue. I spent some time with a friend's high-end Swaro bins and realized you could glass through something like that all day long. To give you an extreme example, I have been out to the range in moderate mirage and was able to see a target @ 300 yards (and even resolve bullet holes) with a Premier 3-15 on 15X while I couldn't see the same hardly at all with my cheap Bushnell spotter set @ 36X. Even an incredible 100mm objective uber-spotter will let you down at some point and I've always been skeptical that it would help until seeing things like that with my own eyes.
You might really want to take a good look at the non-illuminated version of the SS 5-20. It pains me to tell you (well, it would pain you more) to know that it was recently available for $1039.96, but the $1299 list price still makes it a great deal. I had the illuminated version and found it was great in every way, save one: mag range. I went back to Premier because I really wanted 3-15. |
|
Reaction time is a factor...
|
|
kesi
Optics Apprentice Joined: July/23/2009 Location: Czech Republic Status: Offline Points: 83 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I have a Sightron S3 16x42 . How good glass compared with the Night Force, IOR, Zeiss Conquest, SS HD, Bushnell Elite 4200/6500 ...?
|
|
atomiclab
Optics Apprentice Joined: November/17/2011 Location: Tx Status: Offline Points: 68 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I have read lots of good things about the Sightron siii.
|
|
atomiclab
Optics Apprentice Joined: November/17/2011 Location: Tx Status: Offline Points: 68 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
does anyone have experience comparing Sightron siii to the SWFA SS scopes
thinking of a siii 6-24 x 50 with moa2 reticle or SS 5-20 x 50 with modified mildot reticle how do they compare optically? I understand they both have good glass. oh and I guess I would throw Zeiss conquest 5-20x50 Edited by atomiclab - December/15/2011 at 11:30 |
|
atomiclab
Optics Apprentice Joined: November/17/2011 Location: Tx Status: Offline Points: 68 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
interesting, I was really wanting to know how the expensive long range/ tactical scopes compared with each other, but the conversation still went to the sightron, SS, and such.
|
|
jonoMT
Optics Master Extraordinaire Joined: November/13/2008 Location: Montana Status: Offline Points: 4853 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Okay. Back to high-end scopes:
For features and magnification range (3-15), as well as reliability and tracking, I would choose either a NF F1 or Premier LT (in my case, went with the Premier because of significantly better glass). But that's because target turrets, zero stop, reticle choice and the above-mentioned attributes are what's important to me. Hensoldt (Zeiss) would be the top of the heap, but that extra $1K is too much for me. Other Zeiss offerings in the $1700 - $3000 range just lack the features that make it worthwhile to spend the money. Great glass is just one desirable feature. A scope without a reticle with uniform subtensions and matching TARGET turrets is worth no more to me than a much cheaper Conquest. Same goes for Swaro or S&B hunting scopes. USO is a company I greatly respect but they share one thing in common with Nightforce: decent but not great glass. All this is just my $.02 so you have to consider what is important to you. |
|
Reaction time is a factor...
|
|
koshkin
MODERATOR Dark Lord of Optics Joined: June/15/2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 13181 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I wrote three rather lengthy articles on High End Tactical scopes. There is some discussion of them that you can see on this thread:
Or you can go directly to the articles on my OpticsThoughts website. ILya
|
|
biggreen747
Optics Journeyman Joined: October/16/2009 Location: Colorado Status: Offline Points: 470 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I can understand why when you lay out so much cash that you would treat these scopes with kid gloves. The real market however for optics like this is people who stake their lives and the lives of others on their equipment. Therefore, when you get to optics in this class good glass is certainly a requirement but durability and mechanical precision are mandatory |
|
We measure it with a micrometer, mark it with a crayon, and cut it with a chainsaw.
|
|
atomiclab
Optics Apprentice Joined: November/17/2011 Location: Tx Status: Offline Points: 68 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Ilya,
That was a great review. It really helped answer a lot of my questions about this class of scopes. I really like that MP-8 reticle that IOR has. |
|
atomiclab
Optics Apprentice Joined: November/17/2011 Location: Tx Status: Offline Points: 68 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Biggren, I totally understand, and I agree, the point I was trying to make is that I am not a real sniper, I am not looking for a scope for my self and then fight on the front line. I am a hobby shooter and varminter and hunter.
Those who do have to use their guns and optics as life and death to protect us in what ever job that may be ( military, police, ect...) have my HIGHEST respect.
|
|
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |