Visit the SWFA.com site to check out our current specials. |
Spotting scope selection??? |
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Author | |
grizbacker
Optics Apprentice Joined: September/09/2011 Location: Montana Status: Offline Points: 70 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: September/09/2011 at 14:15 |
Hey guys, New to the forum and am looking for some advice. I am looking to buy a spotting scope. It will be used primarily for backcountry mule deer and elk hunting. I may need to judge deer and elk up to ¾-1 mile away. My first question is the size. Obviously weight and size are important as I will be backpacking in many miles. So I am thinking either 50 or 60 mm. I know the 60 will give me more low light performance and allow me to see better at higher magnification, but is it worth the weight? I noticed that many of the 50mm only magnify up to 30x. Would this be enough magnification to look out to a mile and judge game? Lastly is price and specific models. I really like what I read of the Nikon ed 50. It would be the very top of my price range though. Do you guys think it magnification would be adequate for my needs? Also, the Nikon goldring 15-30x50mm is only $400. How does it stack up? If I need to go with the 60mm I will need to do some more research on models and price so any help there would be appreciated. Thanks for any input! |
|
grizbacker
Optics Apprentice Joined: September/09/2011 Location: Montana Status: Offline Points: 70 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Anyone? |
|
Bitterroot Bulls
Optics Master Extraordinaire Joined: May/07/2009 Location: Montana Status: Offline Points: 3416 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I have a Nikon ED50 that I purchased for exactly the uses you describe, grizbacker. So far, so good, but I am holding my final judgement until the end of the season. It practically disappears into the pack though!
For me, the 30x magnification is plenty for most glassing up to 2 miles away. The ED50 also accepts other eyepieces. The MC1 zoom eyepiece is 13-30 on the ED50, but the MC2 would be a 13-40. I have my eye out for a good used one right now. |
|
-Matt
|
|
anweis
Optics Master Joined: January/29/2006 Status: Offline Points: 1148 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
My ED 50 is angled and it has a wide angle 20x fixed power eyepiece. I tried and still have the 13-30 eyepiece, but i liked the 20x much better because of sharper view and much wider field of view. It even has a longer eye relief. I suggest the angled body, because it would allow you to use a shorter and smaller tripod. 20x is plenty for spotting racks.
This package, when mounted on good light tripod, is mountain worthy. I carried mine hunting and birding on 3 continents and it is the best scope i've ever had and used. I do treat it well and keep it in a neoprene case.
My Swarovski HD 80 mm has been waiting for the day when it will get sold ever since i purchased the 50 ED.
I can't tell you the tripod number, but Manfrotto makes a 2-3 lb tripod that works perfectly with the little ED 50.
|
|
Bitterroot Bulls
Optics Master Extraordinaire Joined: May/07/2009 Location: Montana Status: Offline Points: 3416 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I use my ED50 with a Vortex High Country Tripod. It is a tiny package and works well. If I can find a fixed 27x eyepiece, I will likely use it.
|
|
-Matt
|
|
grizbacker
Optics Apprentice Joined: September/09/2011 Location: Montana Status: Offline Points: 70 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Thanks for the input guys! I am still a little worried about the magnification on the 50mm. I have been looking into some 60mm scopes. I liked what i read about the vortex viper HD but it sure is heavy. Anybody know much about it? Also, I was looking into a nikon Fieldscope III ED. It is the old version with 20-45X eyepiece. However, when shopping around I came across
the Tactical Fieldscope TF3 ED. It
appears to be the same scope but in black.
It is also quite a bit cheaper. My
question is, are they essentially the same scope? If not, what are the
differences?
|
|
Bitterroot Bulls
Optics Master Extraordinaire Joined: May/07/2009 Location: Montana Status: Offline Points: 3416 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
The Fieldscope EDIII and TF3 are the same scope. The 20-45 eyepiece is the same eyepiece that usually comes with the ED50, it is just a 13-30 on the ED50.
I would take the ED50 over either the Fieldscope ED3 or the Viper HD. In fact, I did. |
|
-Matt
|
|
grizbacker
Optics Apprentice Joined: September/09/2011 Location: Montana Status: Offline Points: 70 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Bitteroot,
If you dont mind me asking, why did you choose the 50mm over the other two? Was it mostly because of the weight or is it an optical quality issue? I ask because I here the ED III has good quality just like the 50.
|
|
Bitterroot Bulls
Optics Master Extraordinaire Joined: May/07/2009 Location: Montana Status: Offline Points: 3416 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Yeah the EDIII might have a slight edge in overall performance, even. But it is twice as heavy. I use my ED50 for backpacking. I have a Razor 85HD for everything else.
The ED50's optical quality is very, very good. I was looking at deer at two miles with it last weekend. |
|
-Matt
|
|
grizbacker
Optics Apprentice Joined: September/09/2011 Location: Montana Status: Offline Points: 70 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Bitteroot,I am torn between the two! I love the weight savings of the 50. I just worry about judging deer at distance. You said you were looking at deer two miles away. Would you be able to judge antler size at that distance?
P.S. Where in montana are you from? Bitteroot valley?
|
|
Bitterroot Bulls
Optics Master Extraordinaire Joined: May/07/2009 Location: Montana Status: Offline Points: 3416 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I was judging antler size. With good atmospheric conditions, it shouldn't be too much of a problem.
P.S. I am in the Bitterroot, but I went to school in Bozeman. Go CATS!! |
|
-Matt
|
|
grizbacker
Optics Apprentice Joined: September/09/2011 Location: Montana Status: Offline Points: 70 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Haha... We are on opposite side of the rivalry then! Thats alright though, my brother plays for the cats. Thanks for your advice. I am now leaning toward the 50 but I'm just not sold on one or the other yet. I am used to an 80mm 60x scope so I get a little unconfortable about only having 30x.
|
|
Bitterroot Bulls
Optics Master Extraordinaire Joined: May/07/2009 Location: Montana Status: Offline Points: 3416 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I was in the same boat, and I would be lying if I didn't miss that extra magnification sometimes, but certainly not enough to justify the weight penalty. You can see surprisingly good detail with 30x. |
|
-Matt
|
|
anweis
Optics Master Joined: January/29/2006 Status: Offline Points: 1148 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
With my ED 50 and 20xWA, i could see pheasants at 1600 meters (1 mile) and tell what species and whether they were male or female, 25 minutes after sunset. I can see .22 holes on white paper at 300 yards easily. That is sharp and bright. This scope is optically as good as or better than a 65mm with a zoom, but much more portable.
It is normal for you to fret over size and power; Most people do. I found my 50ED better than several 65mm Nikons i looked though. The only small scope that i though was optically better was a handpicked Pentax 65mm ED with a $500 WA eyepiece on it. But, much heavier and larger and no longer waterproof.
|
|
grizbacker
Optics Apprentice Joined: September/09/2011 Location: Montana Status: Offline Points: 70 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Here is a question for you guys. If I were to buy a fieldscope III 60mm with the 20-45x eyepiece, could I then buy the ED 50 scope body only and use the eyepiece for the 50 as well? Are they the same exact eypiece?This would allow me to choose between the two depending on the hunt but save some money as well.
|
|
Bitterroot Bulls
Optics Master Extraordinaire Joined: May/07/2009 Location: Montana Status: Offline Points: 3416 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Yes, it is the exact same eyepiece, and will screw on to either one. It will just be a 13-30 on the ED50, due to the focal length of the ED50. |
|
-Matt
|
|
grizbacker
Optics Apprentice Joined: September/09/2011 Location: Montana Status: Offline Points: 70 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I might do that then. I can get the fieldscope ed III with the 20-45x eyepiece used in good condition for 700$ and I can get an ed 50 body only new for 300$. So for 1000$ I would have two pretty good options depending on the hunt.
|
|
supertool73
Optics God Superstool Joined: January/03/2008 Status: Offline Points: 11814 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
THat sounds like a good plan.
|
|
Lifetime warranty and excellent customer service don't mean a thing when your gun fails during a zombie attack.
"A Liberal is a person who will give away everything they don't own." |
|
grizbacker
Optics Apprentice Joined: September/09/2011 Location: Montana Status: Offline Points: 70 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
When looking at these eypieces, is there a difference between the 7466 and the MC or MCII?
|
|
Bitterroot Bulls
Optics Master Extraordinaire Joined: May/07/2009 Location: Montana Status: Offline Points: 3416 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
The 7466 was the original Fieldscope zoom. The MC zoom stayed with the model number 7466, but was multicoated. If you see a 7466 marketed now, it is almost certainly a MC. The MCII is an entirely different zoom. It would be a 20-60 on the 60mm and a 13-40 on the ED50. It is also fully interchangeable on all non-EDG fieldscopes.
|
|
-Matt
|
|
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |