Visit the SWFA.com site to check out our current specials. |
Swarovski Z3 4-12X50 BRH reticle |
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Author | |
Bitterroot Bulls
Optics Master Extraordinaire Joined: May/07/2009 Location: Montana Status: Offline Points: 3416 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: January/30/2011 at 18:14 |
I got to the range today and thought I would share some first impressions of my new Z3.
First, here are some pics of her mounted on the Elkinator: Range time: My first set of TPS rings were a dream!. They required very little lapping. I used the old eyeball-through-the-bore bore sighting method, and had the scope zeroed in 4 shots (more on this later). A sub 1/2 MOA group later and I start ringing steel at 300 yards. It became quickly apparent that this scope and rifle needed some more range. I can't wait to stretch it out! Optical performance: The Z3 series is marked that it is assembled in the USA. I don't know if the optical components are sourced from Austria or wherever, but I will say this: This scope is optically superb. The field of view is quite wide. There is little to no tunnel effect and the eyebox is quite forgiving. Eye relief is listed at 3.54 inches. It is all of that and CONSTANT throughout the magnification range. The image is clean, bright, and flat. In fact, the image is similar to a high end 50mm spotter. CA control is really good. The weather a the range was cold (28 degrees F) and snowing. There were a lot of high-conrast subjects at the range. There was very, very little color fringing. Images stay sharp until very near the edge. As far as resolution goes, I was able to resolve a tiny print ad on the bottom of my paper target at 100 yards. This is the first rifle scope I've used that performed at that level. This scope out-resolves and has noticeably better CA control to my Zeiss Conquest. Overall my initial optical impressions of this scope are overwhelmingly positive. Build/Ergonomics: This scope feels extremely light for it's objective size and power range. The scope also looks extremely sleek for a 1 inch tube 50mm objective scope. It looks right on my Sendero. The power ring turns with moderate force, and very smoothly. There is no parallax adjustment. The parallax of my BRH-equipped model is set at the factory at 200 meters. Non-BRX/H models are factory set at 100 meters. The sleekness will definitely aid in using scabbards, which is one of the main reasons I chose this scope. Adjustments: Well, not everything went perfect with this scope. After the first shot, I was four inches low and five inches left. I dialed the adjustment and shot again. Three inches high and two inches left. Hmmm. Adjust again. Fire. Elevation perfect. Windage still one inch left. Adjust four clicks right. Fire. Dead nuts. Two more shots, and I have a tiny three shot group right where it should be. My best guess is the adjustments were likely accurate, but the new mounts had to "settle" through the first few shots from the 300 RUM. Time will tell on how it holds up. I did not get this scope for dialing dope. This is a set-it-and-forget-it setup. Reticle: The BRH is the "heavy" version of the BRX ballistic reticle from Swarovski. I liked the idea of the BRX, but when I first saw one, I knew immediately it was way to thin to be a practical hunting reticle for me. The BRH is heavier, but still thinner than I would like. It is quite a bit thinner than my Rapid Z 600 reticle. I will have to do some low light testing with this reticle. However, it was easy to pick up in the falling snow and less-than-ideal conditions at the range. Here is a pic of the reticle, just to show setup and thickness: Conclusion: My first range experience was quite positive. I am hopeful for this scope, and I will keep the OT updated! Edited by Bitterroot Bulls - January/31/2011 at 09:33 |
|
-Matt
|
|
SVT_Tactical
MODERATOR Chief Sackscratch Joined: December/17/2009 Location: NorthCackalacky Status: Offline Points: 31233 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Glad you like it. Good write up
|
|
RifleDude
MODERATOR EVIL OPPRESSOR Joined: October/13/2006 Location: Texas Status: Offline Points: 16337 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Thanks for the review, Matt!
|
|
Ted
Money can't buy happiness... but it's much more comfortable to cry in a Porsche than on a bicycle. |
|
lucytuma
Optics Jedi Knight Joined: November/25/2007 Location: Wisconsin Status: Offline Points: 5389 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Matt, thanks for the review. The Sendero and z3 make one hell of a combo.
|
|
"The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not." - Thomas Jefferson
|
|
stickbow46
Optics Master Extraordinaire Joined: January/07/2009 Location: Benton, Pa Status: Offline Points: 4678 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Thanks for a good review Matt.I also agree with you on the BRX ret.I made the mistake of buying a Z5 with the BRX,way to thin.It will be making a trip to SWARO for a change to plex & a ballistic turret shortly.
|
|
Pearls of Wisdom are Heard not Spoken
|
|
cheaptrick
MODERATOR Joined: September/27/2004 Location: South Carolina Status: Offline Points: 20844 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Good deal! Thanks for the write up!
|
|
bp
Optics GrassHopper Joined: January/20/2011 Status: Offline Points: 11 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Thanks Matt.
This is what I was looking for in choosing a scope for the 280 AI I am am having built. No Swaro dealer close so I would have picked the wrong ret. (BRX). I am starting to wonder if I would gain much over a 4a or 4plex ret. at the ranges I would feel good about shooting at (400 yd or less). Bruce |
|
Bitterroot Bulls
Optics Master Extraordinaire Joined: May/07/2009 Location: Montana Status: Offline Points: 3416 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
bp, If you are going to shoot 400 yards, I think the BRH would be a better choice, because you are past the maximum point blank range for the rifle. I have found practicing with a ballistic reticle to be confidence inspiring. YMMV |
|
-Matt
|
|
bp
Optics GrassHopper Joined: January/20/2011 Status: Offline Points: 11 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
You are probably right on the ballistic ret. I've not had a problem with plex and holdover on current 270 but I've not needed to shoot at animals much past 300 yds, wind and longer ranges makes me nervous, and I am used to the rifle.
The BRH would be helpful with with long shots at long range paper, rocks and just in case. However, I don't want to give up versatility for help on a rare shot hunting. A rapid Z 600 is ok but the ones I've looked through seem slower to get lined up. The Swaro looks a bit less cluttered. I'm over 50 and maybe all the extra lines in the scope just confuse me. |
|
budperm
Optics Retard show me your sheep!! Joined: January/01/2009 Location: Pennsylvania Status: Offline Points: 31710 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Hey Matt!!!!
Have you gotten and played with your new bino's yet?
|
|
"Peace is that brief glorious moment in history when everybody stands around reloading".
--Thomas Jefferson |
|
Bitterroot Bulls
Optics Master Extraordinaire Joined: May/07/2009 Location: Montana Status: Offline Points: 3416 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Hello Bud!!! They are still in the brown truck, en route. |
|
-Matt
|
|
Codhagee
Optics GrassHopper Joined: February/19/2011 Status: Offline Points: 6 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I also have a sendaro 300WM and I'm looking at ether a Z3 or Z5. I would like to know if u have shot anything past 300 yds and what power magnification of the two would you recommend? I do know that I too want the BRH. Just want something that will not leave me wanting more on a elk hunt. Thanks for your review.
|
|
Bitterroot Bulls
Optics Master Extraordinaire Joined: May/07/2009 Location: Montana Status: Offline Points: 3416 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
300 yards is as far as I've gotten so far. As soon as the Montana weather takes a turn for the better, I'll be stretching it out on some steel.
As far as magnification goes, I would say either the 3.5-10 or the 4-12 would be ideal for a magnum elk rifle. The remarkable resolution of these scopes makes extra magnification unnecessary. |
|
-Matt
|
|
mike650
Optics God Joined: May/14/2006 Location: West of Rockies Status: Offline Points: 14569 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
|
“A hunt based only on trophies taken falls far short of what the ultimate goal should be.” – Fred Bear
|
|
koshkin
MODERATOR Dark Lord of Optics Joined: June/15/2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 13182 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Nice write-up, Sir!
ILya
|
|
brilite
Optics GrassHopper Joined: October/29/2009 Location: Virginia Status: Offline Points: 31 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I'm a little late to the party, but what a professionaly written review.
Thanks for all the information.
Brian
|
|
bird_hunter66
Optics Apprentice Joined: September/29/2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 88 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Bitterroots, what caliber was your Remington Sendero?
|
|
D. Holmes
|
|
Bitterroot Bulls
Optics Master Extraordinaire Joined: May/07/2009 Location: Montana Status: Offline Points: 3416 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
She is a 300 RUM.
|
|
-Matt
|
|
Alan Robertson
Optics Master Joined: October/31/2009 Location: Oklahoma Status: Offline Points: 1763 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Matt,
Fine job, sir- many thanks! Don't you just love a good RUM? None of that wimpy Roy or STW stuff- overbore! |
|
"Garg'n uair dhuisgear"
|
|
cheaptrick
MODERATOR Joined: September/27/2004 Location: South Carolina Status: Offline Points: 20844 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I too love TPS rings. Are those mediums?
|
|
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |