Visit the SWFA.com site to check out our current specials. |
Interesting observation on fixed power scopes |
Post Reply | Page 123> |
Author | |
bricat
Optics Master Joined: April/24/2007 Location: Michigan Status: Offline Points: 1881 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: July/06/2010 at 11:51 |
There is a really cool article/pictorial in the July/August edition of Sports Afield on the rifles of Jack O'Connor. It looks as though all of Jacks' rifles were wearing some sort of fixed power scope, Weavers, Leupolds, Stith Kollmorgan in either 3X or 4X. I'm not sure if this was by choice or maybe there weren't alot, if any, variable power scopes back in the day. Either way I thought it was interesting in contrast to todays trend of ultra-high magnification and "giant" 50+ mm objective lenses. Jack certainly was no amateur when it came to hunting, shooting, and just general "gun-looniness" It was refreshing to see some basic, simple, effective killing hardware from days gone by - no 4-16X magnifications, adjustable side focus, tritium illumination, custom paint jobs, just the basics. It sure makes me love my 4X Conquests even more!
|
|
|
|
supertool73
Optics God Superstool Joined: January/03/2008 Status: Offline Points: 11814 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I agree, I have a couple 4x scopes and for many hunting situations they work super well. They are just tough, consistent and always the same.
|
|
Lifetime warranty and excellent customer service don't mean a thing when your gun fails during a zombie attack.
"A Liberal is a person who will give away everything they don't own." |
|
lucytuma
Optics Jedi Knight Joined: November/25/2007 Location: Wisconsin Status: Offline Points: 5389 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Technology is great isn't it, while I think 4x or 6x is just fine for most hunting situations, it sure is nice to be able to go from 2x-10x if required.
|
|
"The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not." - Thomas Jefferson
|
|
Roy Finn
MODERATOR Steiner Junkie Joined: April/05/2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4856 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Every time I think going to a fixed power scope would be a good idea I wake up and realize it was just a bad dream.
|
|
powderburn
Optics Journeyman Joined: April/09/2010 Status: Offline Points: 345 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I agree and have always found 2.5x and 4x scopes to be plenty for all of my hunting needs. Now I will admit most of my hunting is for deer east of the Miss. and frankly my longest shot has been about 225 yds and I've had three at approx. that range. The rest have been from 125 yds to bayonet range. So I might feel differently if I lived out west. But even there 6x is probably plenty .
I imagine that the reason that O Conner used fixed power scopes was in the 50's and 60's when he was at his prime the variables avaliable tended to be rather large and unreliable. That's not the case today. I do find it surprising that the fixed power scopes in say the leupold FX line are as expensive or more so than many of their variables. It's not like they have to come up with a lot of new technology. I would like to see them offer a good solid 4x33 and 6x40 in their redfield line in the sub $150 price range. I bet they would sell more than a few. Having said all of that and still having a couple of 4x scopes still in the lineup, the last couple of scopes I have bought have been variables. The reason is that is what 's readily avaliabe and it is sort of nice when at the range to be able to crank up the power for my old eyes. Funny though my variables really only need two settings 3x and 9x as I rarely stop in between. |
|
bberg7794
Optics Apprentice Joined: June/04/2010 Location: Canton, NY Status: Offline Points: 58 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I have a 1956 Shooter's Bible which lists only two variable power scopes, a 2-7x and a 3-10x, both from Kahles. No price is listed for those two scopes so it looked like they were special order items. The remaining 52 hunting scopes listed are fixed power as are all of the target scopes. My older relatives tell me that during Jack O'Connor's time most rifles weren't scoped at all. In many areas, it was rare to see a scope on a hunting rifle until the 70's(?).
Statistics confirm that 90% of deer, give or take, are killed at less than 200 yards. A fixed 4x scope will take all of these deer. I shot my first buck 21 years ago using a borrowed rifle with a Lyman Alaskan 2 1/2x and a post reticle at 240 yards. One shot. My cousin's father who owned that rifle killed a buck at a measured 410 yards with that same rifle and scope. Some may call that luck but he practiced a lot and that rifle and scope were state-of-the-art for the 60's. That scope was no handicap whatsoever. I hunt mostly on foot in the northern forests of New York. Many of my opportunities happen pretty quickly. If you only have a couple of seconds to make a lethal shot, you really will benefit from a reticle that is simple. Often there is no time to adjust magnification and the shots are not long enough to require allowing for holdover. I would bet this is still the case for many hunters. How many times have you heard the story of not being able to find a deer in the scope because the deer was very close and the scope was set at maximum magnification? |
|
supertool73
Optics God Superstool Joined: January/03/2008 Status: Offline Points: 11814 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
My dad killed a yote at 380 yards with his muzzleloader with a T/C 1x scope.
All my variable hunting scopes are at 3x all the time while hunting. And most of my shots are taken at 3x because they are usually quick. Edited by supertool73 - July/06/2010 at 14:22 |
|
Lifetime warranty and excellent customer service don't mean a thing when your gun fails during a zombie attack.
"A Liberal is a person who will give away everything they don't own." |
|
300S&W
Optics God Joined: January/27/2008 Location: Burlington,WV Status: Offline Points: 10592 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
"If you only have a couple of seconds to make a lethal shot, you really will benefit from a reticle that is simple."
bb,have you seen the C3 reticle offered by Vortex? I got the scope recently so of course haven't hunted with it but myself and others have messed with it enough to realize that the design of the reticle makes for very quick target aquisition.
Edited by 300S&W - July/06/2010 at 14:29 |
|
"I ain't got time to bleed!"
|
|
bberg7794
Optics Apprentice Joined: June/04/2010 Location: Canton, NY Status: Offline Points: 58 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Nope, haven't seen the C3 other than on the net. Sounds interesting though. I'm still planning on buying the Zeiss 4x, but the money I was expecting to have by now has been delayed one month. Have you guys looked through the old time gun ads on Field and Stream's homepage? Several people have commented, myself included, on there not being any scopes in any of the rifle ads from the 40's to the 60's.
|
|
300S&W
Optics God Joined: January/27/2008 Location: Burlington,WV Status: Offline Points: 10592 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
ALOT of receiver mounted peep sights used back then.
|
|
"I ain't got time to bleed!"
|
|
jonoMT
Optics Master Extraordinaire Joined: November/13/2008 Location: Montana Status: Offline Points: 4853 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I've hunted with iron sights (once...and successfully) and have used a 2.5X scout scope and 4X scopes. Any decent 4X is more than adequate out to 200, even 300 yards in the right conditions. They are relatively cheap, compact and lightweight as well as durable. And there's no need to remember to dial down!
I still shoot a 4X Leupy FX-II on my .22 target rifle and have an old Bushnell 4X on another .22. But ever since I got into ranges beyond max. PBR the relatively low magnification, lack of ranging reticles and target turrets made me move to tactical scopes. But I say you should really have a good reason to need more than a good 4X. I'm sure you Zeiss owners out there really love the clarity of the optics too. |
|
Reaction time is a factor...
|
|
300S&W
Optics God Joined: January/27/2008 Location: Burlington,WV Status: Offline Points: 10592 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Yep. My ol'eyes are really appreciating it.
|
|
"I ain't got time to bleed!"
|
|
stickbow46
Optics Master Extraordinaire Joined: January/07/2009 Location: Benton, Pa Status: Offline Points: 4678 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Like you Earl I've got those old eyes[Dec11,1946] Can you tell me what the main difference is between 4A German,which I have on both my hunting riffles & the new C3.Does one have an advantage over the other.....Thanks
|
|
Pearls of Wisdom are Heard not Spoken
|
|
300S&W
Optics God Joined: January/27/2008 Location: Burlington,WV Status: Offline Points: 10592 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Never used a #4 but have used a post and crosshair in an El Paso Weaver K4-1 and Leupold's Hvy Duplex. Both I like for the type of terrain I hunt but this C3 has got my interest peaked. The way it's designed your view is drawn immediately to that center ring and then to the point of aim on your target. To me target aquisition is faster than the other two reticles I mentioned. So far that is the main diff I've found over the other two. I can't tell you the size at 100yds of that ring,although I do plan on measuring it soon,but it is not small like a turkey hunting reticle. Everyone who has looked through the scope says the same thing about it's GOOD target aquisition qualities. So far,unless there is something negative I find out during hunting season,it looks to be a top choice for hunting thick stuff,shooting moving targets,and it's not"too busy"of a reticle to be used at longer shots.
|
|
"I ain't got time to bleed!"
|
|
Terry Lamb
Optics Apprentice Joined: January/19/2009 Location: Sagle, Idaho Status: Offline Points: 150 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Many, many of my customers are outfitters and guides. A common thread of complaints from them is, that after all the work a guide does to get shot opportunities for the hunting client, the clients then devote often very critical time to fussing with all the adjustments on their high-end, high-mag, tall-turret-covered bulky scopes instead of just shooting the animal in a timely fashion.
This is a result of some things obvious, including the fact that many have more money than sense, and fussing with scopes and rifles is admittedly a year-round activity, while taking the big game shot is but a few seconds out of our year.
The consensus among them is that a rapidly increasing percentage of hunters are confused between scope advantages at the bench versus in the field, and show up with great 1000-yd paper scopes which are likely to be a mighty handicap out in the elk woods.
|
|
Terry Lamb
|
|
300S&W
Optics God Joined: January/27/2008 Location: Burlington,WV Status: Offline Points: 10592 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
"The consensus among them is that a rapidly increasing percentage of hunters are confused between scope advantages at the bench versus in the field, and show up with great 1000-yd paper scopes which are likely to be a mighty handicap out in the elk woods."
I've read about that in mag articles for awhile now but from what you say it happens more often than I thought. D*mn shame.
|
|
"I ain't got time to bleed!"
|
|
stickbow46
Optics Master Extraordinaire Joined: January/07/2009 Location: Benton, Pa Status: Offline Points: 4678 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Thanks for the info.I used to use a fix 4x but as I've gotten older I switched over to a Conquest 3.5-10x50 with a #4 ret.I find myself still not exceeding 5x.I will try to find a store that might have a scope with the C3.
|
|
Pearls of Wisdom are Heard not Spoken
|
|
JeffO
Optics GrassHopper Joined: April/03/2010 Status: Offline Points: 36 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Fixed-power scopes are great. The only real improvement that could be made to them, is if there could just be a way to adjust (say by turning a ring on the ocular, perhaps?) to other power settings. THEN a guy would have something!
Or, a guy could carry pre-sighted 3x, 4x, 6x and 9x fixed power scopes with quick-release rings and swap scopes as the situation dictates. He could carry them in a bandolier around the chest so that swapping them would be really fast.
Tongue firmly in cheek.... :)
When direct observation showed me that I preferred the view of a Leupold 2.5-8x36mm, set at 4x, over the Leupold 4x that I'd come into the gunshop to BUY that day... I knew then that variables were by and large the scope for me.
|
|
Nothing is exactly as it seems
Nor is it otherwise |
|
koshkin
MODERATOR Dark Lord of Optics Joined: June/15/2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 13181 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
There is nothing particularly wrong with a fixed power scope if that is what you like. In some situations they offer certain advantages: compactness of the ACOG or ruggedness and long eye relief of the FX-2 2.5x20 for example.
However, for most uses, if you really want a fixed power scope, get a variable and duct tape the power adjustment ring at the setting you like. ILya |
|
300S&W
Optics God Joined: January/27/2008 Location: Burlington,WV Status: Offline Points: 10592 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
!!!!!!
|
|
"I ain't got time to bleed!"
|
|
Post Reply | Page 123> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |