Visit the SWFA.com site to check out our current specials. |
New Zen Ray Vista and ZRS HD |
Post Reply |
Author | |
Klamath
Optics Master Joined: May/20/2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1308 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: March/03/2010 at 18:52 |
I did not have much intention of trying either of these, but my curiosity eventually got the better of me. I have come to like the 7x36 ZEN ED 2 enough that I made arrangements to trade an 8x43 in NIB condition for a second 7x36. I sent it in, and the new one is not in yet, as Charles was getting low on inventory and asked if he could wait until he got his next order with the new ZRS. The second one will be the glare fix version as well. So, as events turned out out, I now have the When ZR says they are new, they mean new, not just revisions or updates of the older versions, but completely different design and housing on both and neither bear a lot of resemblance to their predecessor, neither physically nor optically. The These bear an astonishing resemblance to the Vortex Diamondback, both physically and optically. The Diamondback I have is the 7x36 version, but the interior assemblage of parts looks different. I suppose this may be an example of convergent evolution, as I believe the The The focus travel is quite smooth, and somewhat easier than the ZRS, but a lot less stiff than the ZEN ED 2. The diopter is right barrel, non-locking. It shows no tendency to shift settings and seems stiff enough to stay where it is set. The IPD range is from 56-75mm. The ZRS HD 8x42 I really expected to see a similar physical package with the new ZRS and the old ZRS. This is not the case. The new ZRS is quite a bit more compact, not very much larger than the Diamondback 7x36. It has the same rubber armor and thumb indents found in the ZEN ED. It is 5.4” retracted and 5.8” extended. The extended distance is the same as the The views The comparison line up of binoculars were; 7x36 Diamondback, 7x32 Leupold GR Switch Power, 7x36 ZEN ED 2 (my Swift Eaglets are gone at the moment) , 8x42 Promaster ELX ED, 10x42 original ZRS, and10x 43 ZEN ED 2. The first ZR binocular I unpacked was the |
|
Steve
"Everything that can be counted does not necessarily count; everything that counts cannot necessarily be counted". William Bruce Cameron |
|
Roy Finn
MODERATOR Steiner Junkie Joined: April/05/2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4856 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Steve any chance you can change the font size on this post?
|
|
Klamath
Optics Master Joined: May/20/2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1308 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Ouch, that was kinda small. Fixed it.
|
|
Steve
"Everything that can be counted does not necessarily count; everything that counts cannot necessarily be counted". William Bruce Cameron |
|
Roy Finn
MODERATOR Steiner Junkie Joined: April/05/2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4856 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Thanks. Nice review.
|
|
jonoMT
Optics Master Extraordinaire Joined: November/13/2008 Location: Montana Status: Offline Points: 4853 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
FYI, if Steve wasn't such a good guy and hadn't edited the font size on his post, you could temporarily zoom in with your browser (usually CTRL-+ and CTRL-0 will set it back to the default)...or get a pair of Vistas and stand back about 10 feet from the monitor.
|
|
Reaction time is a factor...
|
|
Bitterroot Bulls
Optics Master Extraordinaire Joined: May/07/2009 Location: Montana Status: Offline Points: 3416 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Great Review!
I think I can scrounge up the change for some of the new ZRS. That seems like a lot of performance for $200.
When will SWFA be shipping?
|
|
-Matt
|
|
Klamath
Optics Master Joined: May/20/2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1308 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Thanks Matt.
I don't know when SWFA will get their shipment. As far as I know Zen Ray was expecting theirs by today (March 4). I think they had some more ZEN ED 2 coming as well, so it was probably busy at ZR today.
I doubt you will be dissapointed. I was pleasantly surprised. Lots of bang for the buck in either one.
Edited by Klamath - March/04/2010 at 21:52 |
|
Steve
"Everything that can be counted does not necessarily count; everything that counts cannot necessarily be counted". William Bruce Cameron |
|
Digit
Optics GrassHopper Joined: July/02/2007 Location: New Zealand Status: Offline Points: 36 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Photos?
|
|
Zen-Ray
Optics Apprentice Joined: July/24/2009 Location: Oregon Status: Offline Points: 52 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Steve, thanks a lot for the review. I hope you had good time with those two pairs.
here are some photos.
2010 VISTA
2010 ZRS HD
Thanks
|
|
DLJ6
Optics GrassHopper Joined: March/07/2010 Location: Virginia Status: Offline Points: 7 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Klamath,
thanks for the thorough timely review. If you are so inclined would you consider this non hypothetical question? Suppose for a moment that one has a budget of $300 to spend on a pair of 10x Zen Rays .. The sportsman will use these bins for general nature observation, bow and gun hunting to include waterfowl jump shooting from a kayak. In your educated opinion should I purchase the Zen-Ray 10x43 Zen ED Binocular DEMO-A for $289 off of the Sample list or The ZRS HDs for $215 directly from ZR? I have read the posts here and elsewhere regarding the internal reflection issue with the first gen. EDs but am not sure if the issue is troublesome enough to pass on the under $300 EDs in favor of the new Summits. Your feedback and any from Charles if he cares to weigh in would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Dave 2010 (SUMMIT) |
|
Zen-Ray
Optics Apprentice Joined: July/24/2009 Location: Oregon Status: Offline Points: 52 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Dave,
The 10x43 ZEN ED demo is an incredible deal from SWFA. If I were you, I would jump on that one while it lasts. The ED glass controls the color fringing, especially at the edge of the FOV much better. The field of view is also 8% wider with ZEN ED. With that said, if you do not pay much attention to those features, I think the new 2010 ZRS HD will be an excellent option too.
I would encourage you to order new ZRS HD through SWFA too. I know they are not up on the website yet. Chris and his team have been very busy. It definitely worthy giving them a call to reserve a copy through SWFA.
Thanks
Charles
|
|
RifleDude
MODERATOR EVIL OPPRESSOR Joined: October/13/2006 Location: Texas Status: Offline Points: 16337 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Good review, Steve! Thanks for your time and effort!
|
|
Ted
Money can't buy happiness... but it's much more comfortable to cry in a Porsche than on a bicycle. |
|
Klamath
Optics Master Joined: May/20/2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1308 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
You sort of describe two non hypothetical binoculars. The jump shooting ducks from a kayak, and generally closer range expanses of shotgun hunting, really indicate no more than 8x. In my purely non hypothetical personal opinion, I'd go 7-8x.
But lets get to the single binocular question. I have been there myself. Need one, bills to be paid with the extra money. To be real honest the new ZRS HD is a hell of a lot closer to the optical quality of the ZEN ED than I was prepared to find. I no longer have the ZEN ED 1 series, but I still have the nearly identical Promaster ELX ED. Now if somebody with an optics hobby like mine wants to we can pick apart most anything. Are there some differfences, yes there are, but to be as honest as I can, unless you have both side by side they are hard to find. Most people probably would ask "what difference". If you don't have them side by side you sure won't wish for much different, no matter which one you have.
The glare issue seems to have been limited to just the initial production run of the 7x36. There was some discussion of that veiling glare from some of the x43 owners, but not very much. I am fortunate in that a lot of things that bug some people to distraction usually don't bother me. I can identify them if I look, but so far I can ignore the faults if there enough good points. I was not bothered at all by the glare, but it was a deal breaker for some others. Having said that, the ZRS HD is a little bit better at stay light control. The ZRS is almost as good at CA and color fringing contrrol as its larger ED sibling. You don't say if you wear glasses, but eye relief for glass wearers may be better at 8x.
So, in my estimation there are three other practical differences. One is the ZRS HD has a smaller IPD adjustment which will adapt them better of people with closer set eyes. If you don't have close set eyes (neither do I) this will not mean much. The second is the ZRS is quite a bit smaller than the ZEN ED. I'm thinking of the duck hunter in the kayak here. It is an inch shorter and over 1/4# lighter than the ZEN ED. The size directly ties into the third difference, which is ergonomics. The two binoculars simply feel different. I like the bigger size If I am only worrying about managing a binocular and not a gun, camera or other stuff. I like a bit more compactness when I have other gear along.
My advice here is get the ZRS HD. I'd also go 8x42 rather than 10x. It is a common mistake to go to too much power first. I like 8x because the image is more stable, the field is wider and typically will be brighter than 10x. The depth of field is deper with 8x, again I'm thinking of less focus fiddling when you are out duck hunting. Personally I find if I can't get enough detail with 8x, then I need more magnification than going to 10x.
There is my non hypothetical $0.02. Edited by Klamath - March/08/2010 at 19:07 |
|
Steve
"Everything that can be counted does not necessarily count; everything that counts cannot necessarily be counted". William Bruce Cameron |
|
Klamath
Optics Master Joined: May/20/2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1308 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Somebody asked for some pictures, so let's see if I can figue this out.
ZRS and Vista
The Diamondback 7x36 and ZRS HD 8x42
Here is the the whole lineup, L to R
Diamondback 7x36, ZRS 8x42. Nikon Monarch 8x42, Vista 8x42. ZEN ED 7x36 and 10x43.
|
|
Steve
"Everything that can be counted does not necessarily count; everything that counts cannot necessarily be counted". William Bruce Cameron |
|
DLJ6
Optics GrassHopper Joined: March/07/2010 Location: Virginia Status: Offline Points: 7 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Thanks for the quick replies Charles and Steve.
Steve, I do wear eyeglasses but prefer to push my bins up under them. I agree 8x is likely the best all purpose mag. level. I used to own a Pair of Zeiss Jena plant 8x30s and they were great in the bow woods. When we glass from the yaks we are doing so from as far upstream as sight lines and conditions permit in order to determine against which bank the waterfowl are holding. Your point regarding the physical characteristics are duly noted and relative compactness is appreciated when wrangling gear in a tree stand or during spot and stalk maneuvers. I will be sure to let you guys know what I decide to go with and how they work out for my less than hypothetical applications! Great site and info here, thanks again. Dave |
|
spf2
Optics Apprentice Joined: February/02/2007 Status: Offline Points: 169 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
does the new ZRS still have metal alloy body? I just got a pair of Nikon monarch from the fleabay. The eyecups got twisted off so easily. Did anyone else have the same problem?
|
|
Klamath
Optics Master Joined: May/20/2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1308 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
The ZRS HD is a magnesium alloy body.
The eye cups have ALWAYS been problematic with the Monarch. Seems like they are either fine or crap, not much in between. Edited by Klamath - March/18/2010 at 10:19 |
|
Steve
"Everything that can be counted does not necessarily count; everything that counts cannot necessarily be counted". William Bruce Cameron |
|
spf2
Optics Apprentice Joined: February/02/2007 Status: Offline Points: 169 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
thanks. now, I had to use loctite to glue the monarch's eyecups. They will not come off now. But it will not twist either. I may try a pair of new ZRS one day. I need a binoculars at that compact size.
|
|
DLJ6
Optics GrassHopper Joined: March/07/2010 Location: Virginia Status: Offline Points: 7 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Took delivery on my 2010 10x42 ZRS from SWFA last Friday. I used them for an hour or so bird watching around the yard over the weekend. I am impressed! Edge to edge clarity and the brightness are outstanding for under $200 bins. Diopter and focus wheel offer good resistance. I will report back after I have a few more hours on them.
|
|
spf2
Optics Apprentice Joined: February/02/2007 Status: Offline Points: 169 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
it is really tempting. from the picture, I really like the compact size of ZRS.
|
|
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |