Visit the SWFA.com site to check out our current specials. |
really tough decision little help |
Post Reply |
Author | |
m_freeman
Optics Apprentice Joined: August/07/2009 Status: Offline Points: 69 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: October/29/2009 at 22:05 |
I have decided for sure on 10x for my hunting out West here. My budget is $400.00 max
competitor has Nikon Monarch 10x56 at around $230.00 then there is the Zen ED's 10x42 in around $400.00 range then I was thinking maybe I could find a better performing or as good performing Porro prism for a lot less. Or if I pay around $400.00 for a 10x56 porro I would get more low light servicability than the Zen ED Am I better off with larger optic for low light the 10x56 monarch or the smaller Zen with ED. in the end looking for best hunting bino 10x $400.00 or less all I can say is there are some really good binos when you include the porros as well. driving me nuts. Oh I don't mind lesser waterproofing if it will get me better view.
|
|
m_freeman
Optics Apprentice Joined: August/07/2009 Status: Offline Points: 69 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Another thought I had was to just buy the Nikon Action 10x50 to get me through this season and save to move up to the $800-$1000 dollar range later.
|
|
Klamath
Optics Master Joined: May/20/2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1308 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Speaking strictly from the binoculars you mention, just get the ZEN ED or ED 2and don't look back. The only good porro that will come close to it is the Swift Audubon 8.5x44. Monarchs are not in the same optical league as the ZEN ED.
|
|
Steve
"Everything that can be counted does not necessarily count; everything that counts cannot necessarily be counted". William Bruce Cameron |
|
m_freeman
Optics Apprentice Joined: August/07/2009 Status: Offline Points: 69 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
|
m_freeman
Optics Apprentice Joined: August/07/2009 Status: Offline Points: 69 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
sounds like these zen ed2 are about as good as the entry zeiss conquest for $300.00 less.
Zeiss conquest 10x is the only decent binos I have ever looked through so that is a reference for me. Any advice and wisdon appreciated. Strongly leaning towards the zen ed2
|
|
Klamath
Optics Master Joined: May/20/2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1308 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Why anyone wants to lug around a heavyweight 10x56 Monarch escapes me quite frankly. The ZEN ED performs well past legal shooting hours, weighs far less than the Monarch, has a much better image, and a much better field of view.
Frankly, the Zeiss Conquest is not the optical equal of the ZEN ED. In some aspects, the ZEN ED has optics that will challenge the very top end binoculars produced. They are new and durability and ruggedness have yet to be defined, but they represent the best bang for the optical $$ there is at your level of budget. Even if you ultimately decide to go to an accepted high end binocular, you will then have a ready made capable back up with the ZEN.
Get the ZEN ED here from Chris or from the Zen Ray website. Edited by Klamath - October/29/2009 at 23:56 |
|
Steve
"Everything that can be counted does not necessarily count; everything that counts cannot necessarily be counted". William Bruce Cameron |
|
m_freeman
Optics Apprentice Joined: August/07/2009 Status: Offline Points: 69 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
|
JGRaider
Optics Master Joined: February/06/2008 Status: Offline Points: 1540 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Klamath, well said and I couldn't agree more. M-freeman, spring for the ED2 @ app $400 from SWFA and you will not be disappointed I promise. If you ever have issues Charles has proven he'll take care of his customers. Let us know what you think when you look through them.
The standard ED will work I'm sure, the ED2 will make you go "Wow"! |
|
Klamath
Optics Master Joined: May/20/2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1308 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
You really have to have the ED and ED 2 side by side to tell the difference. The ED 2 is a little brighter and has better contrast and has a bit more neutral color bias. The ED has a smoother, slower focus wheel, and the ED 2 has repellent coatings.
I think too many people get far too hung up with low light performance. I guess you will have to take me at my word here, but the ZEN ED is good enough in twilight. If you can't tell what you need with any good 10x42, then you have no business attempting a shot. Besides at that time of day the view from the scope, not the binocular, is what will determine either shoot or don't shoot.
If you do have some specific high twilight performance needs, then you need a specialized binocular for that specialized use. That is something better than the Monarch 10x56 in my estimation. Edited by Klamath - October/30/2009 at 10:51 |
|
Steve
"Everything that can be counted does not necessarily count; everything that counts cannot necessarily be counted". William Bruce Cameron |
|
m_freeman
Optics Apprentice Joined: August/07/2009 Status: Offline Points: 69 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
thanks for the info guys, yes you are right my scope is indeed the limiting factor.
|
|
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |