![]() |
|
why no .264 in a '06 size case? |
Post Reply
|
Page <1234> |
| Author | ||
BillyWayne
Optics Apprentice
Joined: February/27/2009 Location: New Hampster Online Status: Offline Posts: 275 |
Quote Reply
Topic: why no .264 in a '06 size case?Posted: April/02/2009 at 14:01 |
|
|
A-Square makes brass for the 6.5-06. My uncle and I have talked for years about getting some beater rifles at a gun show or using one of our mausers and converting them to 6.5-06 ourselves. I guess we would have to do up a few to make up for the cost of the reamers and go nogo guages. But I have been a fan of the 6.5 since the first 1913 swedish mauser I bought 13 years ago.
|
||
|
John 11:35
|
||
![]() |
||
supertool73
Optics Master Extraordinaire
Joined: January/03/2008 Location: Utah Online Status: Offline Posts: 3725 |
Quote Reply
Posted: April/02/2009 at 14:52 |
|
|
Looks like Hart chambers barrels in 6.5-06. Hornady, RCBS and Redding all make dies for it.
|
||
|
Lifetime warranty and excellent customer service don't mean a thing when your gun fails during a zombie attack.
"A Liberal is a person who will give away everything they don't own." |
||
![]() |
||
Kickboxer
Optics Master Extraordinaire
Joined: February/13/2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 4520 |
Quote Reply
Posted: April/02/2009 at 16:01 |
|
|
.443-06
|
||
|
Opinion, untempered by fact, is ignorance.
|
||
![]() |
||
Steelbenz
Optics Master
ROLL TIDE ROLL Joined: January/03/2006 Location: Heart of Dixie Online Status: Offline Posts: 2667 |
Quote Reply
Posted: April/02/2009 at 16:24 |
|
![]() 30-06 left .308 right 20mm back ground |
||
|
Be Bold enough to Succeed and Strong enough to not Fear Failure.
|
||
![]() |
||
Kickboxer
Optics Master Extraordinaire
Joined: February/13/2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 4520 |
Quote Reply
Posted: April/02/2009 at 16:31 |
|
20mm rifle ![]() |
||
|
Opinion, untempered by fact, is ignorance.
|
||
![]() |
||
Steelbenz
Optics Master
ROLL TIDE ROLL Joined: January/03/2006 Location: Heart of Dixie Online Status: Offline Posts: 2667 |
Quote Reply
Posted: April/02/2009 at 16:34 |
|
|
Redefining LONG Range!!! LOL
|
||
|
Be Bold enough to Succeed and Strong enough to not Fear Failure.
|
||
![]() |
||
pyro6999
Optics Retard
Mr. Anti .270 Joined: December/22/2006 Location: Minnesota Online Status: Offline Posts: 13051 |
Quote Reply
Posted: April/02/2009 at 16:47 |
|
|
if you want to push the envelope a little look at going with a 6.5-06 AI almost .264 win mag performance.
|
||
|
now i know why i bought a .375H&H!!
.270win sucks 343 we will never forget God Bless Chris Ledoux "good ride cowboy" |
||
![]() |
||
Ed Connelly
Optics Retard
Mui Grande Cucharacha Joined: December/16/2007 Location: USA Online Status: Offline Posts: 12784 |
Quote Reply
Posted: April/02/2009 at 18:15 |
|
Uhhh...............then why not just get a 264 Winchester to begin with??
|
||
![]() |
||
sakomato
Optics Journeyman
Joined: February/28/2008 Location: Houston Online Status: Offline Posts: 532 |
Quote Reply
Posted: April/02/2009 at 20:32 |
|
No belt
Less shoulder gap between new case shoulder and chamber
More brass availability (considering you can use 30-06 brass)
More efficient amount of powder to velocity ratio
Longer barrel life
Less recoil
Less muzzle blast
Easier to find an appropriate powder
I have had a 264 win mag and now have a 6.5 rem mag. IME it is much easier to find a load pushing a 140 gr bullet at 3100 fps than trying to find one in the 264 win mag pushing the same bullet at 3250 fps (my spreadsheet shows red highliter all over it showing pressure signs on the 264 win mag page). It is hard to find a slow enough powder to use in the 264 win mag. With the 6.5-06, 6.5x284 or the 6.5 rem mag the case capacity is less and many powders like IMR4350, IMR4831, RL19, H4831, RL22, IMR7828, H1000 or RL25 or entirely appropriate.
Personally, I like a bullet that starts out between 2900 fps to 3100 fps because if you have a close shot the bullet may not get squirrely on you and blow up or pencil through. I'm a heavy bullet 3000 fps guy and the 264 win mag is too much. The 6.5-06 would be just right.
Edited by sakomato - April/02/2009 at 20:32 |
||
|
Guns only have 2 enemies, rust and politicians
|
||
![]() |
||
Urimaginaryfrnd
Optics Jedi Knight
Resident Redneck Joined: June/20/2005 Location: Iowa Online Status: Offline Posts: 5879 |
Quote Reply
Posted: April/02/2009 at 23:42 |
|
|
http://www.bullberry.com/encore.html
You can get an encore barrel from bullberry in a 6.5-06 or a 6.5-06 improved
|
||
|
>>>=============>
OT's Least Politically Correct |
||
![]() |
||
Urimaginaryfrnd
Optics Jedi Knight
Resident Redneck Joined: June/20/2005 Location: Iowa Online Status: Offline Posts: 5879 |
Quote Reply
Posted: April/02/2009 at 23:48 |
|
7.62x63
|
||
|
>>>=============>
OT's Least Politically Correct |
||
![]() |
||
Dale Clifford
Optics Master Extraordinaire
Joined: July/04/2004 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 3920 |
Quote Reply
Posted: April/03/2009 at 06:58 |
|
|
6.5/06 is ballistically identical to a 6.5/284-- the euros like metric so 7mm and 8mm Brenneke is the 7 and 8mm/06 equiv. Out to 500 yds, most of the 06 class of cartridges all shoot the same.
|
||
![]() |
||
Post Reply
|
Page <1234> |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |