Visit the SWFA.com site to check out our current specials. |
Why doesnt Zeiss step up to the plate in the USA? |
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Author | ||
308WIN
Optics Apprentice Joined: February/28/2009 Status: Offline Points: 120 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: March/24/2009 at 05:32 |
|
Zeiss rifle scopes are some of the finest made in the world. We all know the conquest has caught on and put a huge dent in the mid-priced scope market. I would venture to say the conquest is what caused the vari-x III to VX-III "upgrade" and the VX-III to VX-3 upgrade.
So why doesnt zeiss market the diavari/victory series scopes worth a darn here? THey are the gold standard in most of europe. I went into a Bass Pro a couple of weeks ago, he had seen my diavari and wanted to look at it and swaro z6's. Well bass Pro doesnt carry top of the line zeiss, only conquests. I couldnt understand why. Its like zeiss just concedes defeat to swarovski in the uSA. Zeiss also doesnt advertise or market themselves near as well as swarovski. No TV shows are sponsored by zeiss, I dont see zeiss victory scopes ads in magazines, just conquests. Its almost like they dont expect to sell the 30mm front focal plane scopes here so they dont even mention them. I have never been to a cabelas, do they stock them? Even Bass Pro online doesnt stock the victory scopes? WHat do you guys think? Seems to me like zeiss doesnt want to market the victory series here or maybe the profit margin is so high on the conquest they would rather sell those??? |
||
Ed Connelly
Optics Retard God of no Chihuahua Joined: December/16/2007 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 24225 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
They cost an arm and a leg.
|
||
Dale Clifford
Optics Jedi Knight Joined: July/04/2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 5087 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
zeiss scopes are a very small part of zeiss optical, and I'm sure at the bottom of the list of important stuff. Some scope makers only sell scopes, (some sell flashllights also). I think Euro hunters use one scope fits all, in the usa the hunter/shooter wants a different scope on every gun. The choices in zeiss diavari is limited, also the conquest is an old design and cheaper to make, while the glass is ok, their saddle and turret assembly doesn't even touch some of the current usa stuff. The new zeiss Rapid Z reticles have helped put some life in an old line, but it still remains just that.
|
||
hunter12345
Optics Journeyman Joined: November/21/2007 Status: Offline Points: 470 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
It's cheaper for Zeiss to sell the Conquest line here in the USA.You do find Zeiss Victory scopes being sold here in the states.Here in the northeast Zeiss has dealers who do stock the high end Zeiss line.Leupold did take a beating from the Conquest,4200,SII,Monarch brand scopes which were cheaper and better than the VXIII.
|
||
brodeur272
Optics Journeyman Joined: September/23/2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 609 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
The places I have seen Diavaris have not moved them very much. Price becomes prohibitive for most. Especially when the Kahles and Swaros on demo and clearance have been on the market for a while.
|
||
308WIN
Optics Apprentice Joined: February/28/2009 Status: Offline Points: 120 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
|
||
308WIN
Optics Apprentice Joined: February/28/2009 Status: Offline Points: 120 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
|
||
pyro6999
Optics Retard OT TITAN Joined: December/22/2006 Location: North Dakota Status: Offline Points: 22034 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
because they could easily sell 100 vx-2's in a week where they might sell 10 z6's in a month or even a year. |
||
They call me "Boots"
375H&H Mag: Yeah, it kills stuff "extra dead" 343 we will never forget God Bless Chris Ledoux "good ride cowboy" |
||
Dale Clifford
Optics Jedi Knight Joined: July/04/2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 5087 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
on the zeiss web-- they are making some of the diavaris in sfp and the lower illuminated dot comes in sfp for the dot and ffp for the cross hair, it is these types of changes that will mark interest in zeiss scopes, not trade fairs. |
||
3_tens
Optics Jedi Master Joined: January/08/2007 Location: Oklahoma Status: Offline Points: 7853 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I have never seen the 4200 at a Bass pro shop either. Only 3200 and under. Why sell one quality scope when they can sell several lower priced scopes and keep you comming back because you are not satisfied. $$$$$
|
||
Folks ain't got a sense of humor no more. They don't laugh they just get sore.
Need to follow the rules. Just hard to determine which set of rules to follow Now the rules have changed again. |
||
John Barsness
Optics Optimist Joined: January/27/2009 Status: Offline Points: 785 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
For a long time Zeiss was fairly clueless about marketing anything except binoculars in the U.S., and they weren't even great at that. Their "marketing" campaign mostly consisted of having a few gun writers over the Germany every few years, to tour the factories and tell them how stupid Americans were for not buying Zeiss scopes.
While this was going on Zeiss scopes weren't truly waterproof, mostly had short eye relief, and weren't all that tough. Those features weren't really needed in Germany, so they assumed they weren't needed in America either.
In the meantime Swarovski was trying hard to understand the American market, and making some scopes according to what Americans wanted. They also ran some smart ad campaigns, which pretty much convinced the average American hunter that Swarovski made the best scopes in the world.
Eventually Zeiss realized what was happening, and brought out the Conquests specifically for the American market. But they never have advertised or promoted like Swarovski has, and hence may never catch up.
|
||
mike650
Optics God Joined: May/14/2006 Location: West of Rockies Status: Offline Points: 14569 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
uhh...yeah they do. I just saw an advertisement for the Zeiss Victory scope the other day in one of my hunting magazines. Bxxx Pxx's not really the best gauge for hunting equipment IMHO. Cxxxxx's carries the Victory scopes and caters more toward hunting than B.P. |
||
“A hunt based only on trophies taken falls far short of what the ultimate goal should be.” – Fred Bear
|
||
mike650
Optics God Joined: May/14/2006 Location: West of Rockies Status: Offline Points: 14569 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
hmmm...sounds more like Leupold to me. Edited by mike650 - March/24/2009 at 13:45 |
||
“A hunt based only on trophies taken falls far short of what the ultimate goal should be.” – Fred Bear
|
||
Roy Finn
MODERATOR Steiner Junkie Joined: April/05/2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4856 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Funny I was thinking the same as well. Nobody markets old technology in a new wrapper better than Leupold.
|
||
308WIN
Optics Apprentice Joined: February/28/2009 Status: Offline Points: 120 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Sure you saw an ad but I see ads for swaro in every magazine & every tv. Show. I was hunting with a guy who wants a swaro" because they r the best". Best @ what I asked? Sure they r great but he could get a victory for 400 cheaper & still wanted a swaro because of the power of advertising.
|
||
mike650
Optics God Joined: May/14/2006 Location: West of Rockies Status: Offline Points: 14569 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Positive |
||
“A hunt based only on trophies taken falls far short of what the ultimate goal should be.” – Fred Bear
|
||
Dale Clifford
Optics Jedi Knight Joined: July/04/2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 5087 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
As the use of the scope specializes and the price goes up the available purchasers become more demanding, but not from the power of advertising, but from need, this is seen almost daily from professional photographers, and somewhat recently in the popularity of tactical type scopes. Finishing your analogy he could a leo for $1000 less and still made the shot. |
||
Rancid Coolaid
MODERATOR Joined: January/19/2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 9318 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I would agree with the marketing assertion, I do not think Zeiss has any catching up to do on quality of scope or glass. As has been stated, Zeiss can sell many, many Conquests and make more money than selling a few Victories - and that they have done well. The enthusiast market tends to self-advertise pretty well, ask anyone who owns a McMillan stock or USO/S&B/Premier scope. I don't spend much time paying attention to marketing, it is, by another name, lying for a living. that said, I am a fan of Zeiss and Swarovski, both great scopes. |
||
Freedom is something you take.
Respect is something you earn. Equality is something you whine about not being given. |
||
308WIN
Optics Apprentice Joined: February/28/2009 Status: Offline Points: 120 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
My point was really this;
A certain segment of the population will spens lots of money because of brand recognition & availibilty. Therefore, if I was director of sales for zeiss, I would think that most people who would buy a swaro could be a victory buyer as well. What aren't we doing to geT the brand out there to the consumer? Weare missing out on targeting a specific customer base. I think swaro makes excellent products but I think they also enjoy zeiss's weak attempts @ pushing the high dollar stuff in an agressive manner. |
||
John Barsness
Optics Optimist Joined: January/27/2009 Status: Offline Points: 785 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I didn't say anything about Zeiss's optics. All I was talking about was their marketing strategy in the U.S., which was essentially almost non-existent before the Conquest. You can think what you want about marketing, but the best product in the world won't sell if nobody knows about it, or if very few people can buy it. The best marketing makes people aware of products without lying. Yes, some marketing is lying. Advertisments often contain lies. One of the most blatant lies in all of optics marketing occurred was Swarovski's ad campaign about how much more light was allowed through 30mm scopes versus 1" scopes. This was so successful that lots of people still believe this is a basic optical principle. But it also got a lot of people to look through Swarovski scopes. Getting a booth at the SHOT Show is marketing. Just about every optics company on earth that wants to sell optics does this. Is this lying? No, it's just making the world aware of products. It would be really stupid for Zeiss just to make scopes and binoculars and stack them in warehouses, waiting for somebody to become aware of them and buy them. "Marketing" is, above all, figuring out first how to make people aware of your product. Then it is about creating more demand.Unfortuneately for Zeiss, for many years their American marketing strategy was pretty much just making stuff and hoping Americans would buy it. That changed in the late 1990's. I don't think this was ignorance as much as arrogance. They had some brand recognition here, but relatively poor distribution, which meant that only people who already wanted a Zeiss product would see one. And eventually somebody else (Swarovski) created even more brand recognition. Zeiss assumed that the magic of their own name would beat out the upstart Austrians, but it didn't.
Yeah, the best way to compare products is to try both of them. Unfortunately, not everybody is going to buy both a top-line Zeiss and Swarovski scope and try them out, even with Cabela's return policy. The same applies to all products. Very few people are going to buy a Ford and a Toyota and drive them on alternate days to see which one is the better pickup.
|
||
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |