Visit the SWFA.com site to check out our current specials. |
Optics Opinions Wanted |
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Author | ||||||||||||||
j.chappell
Optics GrassHopper Joined: March/20/2009 Status: Offline Points: 17 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: March/20/2009 at 16:26 |
|||||||||||||
I am looking to purchase a new scope for a 7x57mm that will be used for hunting all North American game, in their varying habitats, that I will be lucky enough to pursue. I have tried to narrow my choices to a few that I feel will fill my needs as well as lending themselves to the rifle.
The rifle in question will be a custom FN with a 22” barrel and a slim sporter style stock. It will have open sights and I will be utilizing either EAW Claw or Pivot mounts. These are a few things that I am not looking for in a scope so please do not suggest anything along these lines: A scope greater than 9x A scope with an objective larger than 42mm A scope with an AO A scope with an illuminated reticle A scope over $800.00 I have narrowed my choices to the models below. If you have any that you feel will meet my needs and desires please share your ideas with me.
J. |
||||||||||||||
John Barsness
Optics Optimist Joined: January/27/2009 Status: Offline Points: 785 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
Those are all excellent scopes.
To me a trim little 7x57 goes just perfectly with a lightweight scope. I have such a 7x57, made by Serengeti Rifles, and have had several different scopes on it, though right now it has a Leupold VX-II 2-7x. However, I have hunted with a lot (both in North America and Africa) with a straight 4x and never had any problem taking game out to 375 yards, which is as far as I've ever shot at anything with a 7x57. Other people prefer more X's for ranges beyond 250-300 yards, but it worked for me--and the longest shots have been on pronghorn and African springbok, which are a little smaller than pronghorn.
|
||||||||||||||
Big Squeeze
Optics Master Extraordinaire GOOGLE NINJA Joined: August/30/2007 Location: Anaheim, Calif. Status: Offline Points: 3143 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
The Meopta, Zeiss and Doctor variable scopes will give you the better glass, but with more scope weight, added size and with more expense. If the added weight and size is not an issue to you, then go with the better glass.
On the other hand, the two variable Leupolds on your list would more than be able to do the job optically, will weigh less, are more compact, are less money and will look better. For looks, you can`t beat a Leupy.
The fixed 6x`s on your list would also work fine, but for closer ranged timber/brush hunting should that occur, where quick acquisition and aiming might be needed on moving or stationary targets within say a 100 yards, I prefer the lower powered variables with the wider FOVs. You`ll have more flexibility with the variable to better match the magnification to any terrain you happen to be hunting in, which is something to also keep in mind.
List your top priorities and go with the scope that best qualifies.
|
||||||||||||||
j.chappell
Optics GrassHopper Joined: March/20/2009 Status: Offline Points: 17 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
I had been kicking around the idea of a fixed 4x as a few of my favorite whitetail rifles wear them or low end variables (1-4’s, 2-7’s). My thinking on the fixed 6x is that it gives me a little more magnification with only a slight loss of field of view.
I currently have a Ruger No.1 RSI in 7x57mm that wears a VX-II 1-4 and I have never felt under scoped but just thought that I may want a little more with the bolt gun as its intended use will be as my primary hunting rifle.
Mr. Barsness, do you see a fixed 6x as a handicap? I have thought long and hard on this and the only place I can see it being an issue with my hunting experience is North Eastern Whitetail drives.
J.
|
||||||||||||||
j.chappell
Optics GrassHopper Joined: March/20/2009 Status: Offline Points: 17 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
"List your top priorities and go with the scope that best qualifies." I've tried to do that but the problem is I have not been able to compare all of the models I am considering firsthand. I prefer to handle and item before I order it and I am looking for experience with Doctor, Meopta, and IOR products.
Thanks.
J.
|
||||||||||||||
Urimaginaryfrnd
MODERATOR Resident Redneck Joined: June/20/2005 Location: Iowa Status: Offline Points: 14964 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
This is way under priced for how good it is they must be going to discontinue this model or else zeiss is really trying hard to beat the competition which I havent ever seen them do. Edited by Urimaginaryfrnd - March/20/2009 at 17:40 |
||||||||||||||
"Always do the right thing, just because it is the right thing to do". Bobby Paul Doherty Texas Ranger |
||||||||||||||
RifleDude
MODERATOR EVIL OPPRESSOR Joined: October/13/2006 Location: Texas Status: Offline Points: 16337 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
Welcome, J. Chappell!
Given your criteria, I would go with either the VX-3 2.5-8X32 you mention or either the Nikon Monarch 2-8X32, Vortex Viper 2-7X32 or 3-9X40, or Zeiss Conquest 2.5-8X32 or 3-9X40. I like the power range vs. objective size of the 1.8-5.5X38, but I don't like the fact that scope is way larger than it should be for its power range.
I would probably lean more toward the Monarch 2-8X32 or one of the two Conquests, with the VX-3 2.5-8X32 close behind.
You won't go wrong with any of your choices, though.
Like you, for the most part, I'm a fan of trim, light, compact scopes on big game rifles.
|
||||||||||||||
Ted
Money can't buy happiness... but it's much more comfortable to cry in a Porsche than on a bicycle. |
||||||||||||||
j.chappell
Optics GrassHopper Joined: March/20/2009 Status: Offline Points: 17 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
Thanks for the welcome!
I am really having trouble with this one. I was hoping that someone here would have had some experience with the Meopta, Docter, and IOR lines. I am seriously thinking of going with the IOR 6x42, Docter 6x42 or 1.5-6x42, or the Meopta 6x42 or 1.5-6x42.
I am leaning towards the IOR 6x42 or Docter 1.5-6x42, and the Meopta 1.5-6x42. I know the Leupold is lighter, a bit shorter, a little slicker, and a bit cheaper but this is going to be my last big game rifle (so I am telling myself) and I just thought I'd stick a little better glass on it than Leupold. Not that there is anything wrong with Leupold, I have many and they have never let me down, I just wanted something different and a step above most of what I have. If I don't like it I can always stick a Leupold that I have laying around on it later.
J.
|
||||||||||||||
Steelbenz
Optics Jedi Knight ROLL TIDE ROLL Joined: January/03/2006 Location: Heart of Dixie Status: Offline Points: 5153 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
That conquest is sweet.
|
||||||||||||||
"Don't argue with a fool! From a distance you can't really tell who's who!"
|
||||||||||||||
Urimaginaryfrnd
MODERATOR Resident Redneck Joined: June/20/2005 Location: Iowa Status: Offline Points: 14964 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
Boy doesnt that sound like Kahles - super glass and some good deals on the samplelist but I looked and the bargains are all 50mm. As long as I'm outside the set parameters
I'm probably the only one but I really am impressed with the Trijicon accupoint scopes illuminated reticle BAC http://www.swfa.com/images/trijicon/binden.swf
I have very closely looked over an IOR 6x42 tactical and compared it to the Leupold Mark 4 10x M3 tactical and the IOR is very nice so I suspect their 6x42 hunting scope would be a winner. I have no experience with either of the Docter or the Meopta but I do like the Nikon Monarch Gold 1.5-6x42.
Edited by Urimaginaryfrnd - March/20/2009 at 20:47 |
||||||||||||||
"Always do the right thing, just because it is the right thing to do". Bobby Paul Doherty Texas Ranger |
||||||||||||||
hunter12345
Optics Journeyman Joined: November/21/2007 Status: Offline Points: 470 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
The Docter is built in the Zeiss factory,I used my friends rifle which had the 3-12x56 and was impressed by the clarity in low light.He has the 1-6x42 model and said its his favorite scope.I like the Sightron Big Sky but if I had the extra money I would buy the Docter.
|
||||||||||||||
medic52
Optics Professional Joined: October/05/2006 Location: Missouri Status: Offline Points: 893 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
I have the ZEISS personally and am really happy with it. Alot of good scopes on your list to pick fromm good luck...............
|
||||||||||||||
"The true soldier fights not because he hates what is in front of him, but because he loves what is behind him." G.K. Chesterton
|
||||||||||||||
Al Nyhus
Optics Apprentice Joined: March/08/2009 Status: Offline Points: 127 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
Of the scopes listed, I'd go with the Leupold 6X42, hands down. The f.o.v. issues make it a better choice than the 2.5-8X36 in my experience.
Sounds like a sweet rig.
|
||||||||||||||
RifleDude
MODERATOR EVIL OPPRESSOR Joined: October/13/2006 Location: Texas Status: Offline Points: 16337 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
You're not at all alone in that regard. I would have included the Accupoint 3-9X40 at the top of my list, except for the fact he stated he wouldn't consider any illuminated reticle scope. Ditto for Kahles; they are excellent scopes in all respects, but I couldn't think of any that met all his criteria. |
||||||||||||||
Ted
Money can't buy happiness... but it's much more comfortable to cry in a Porsche than on a bicycle. |
||||||||||||||
mike650
Optics God Joined: May/14/2006 Location: West of Rockies Status: Offline Points: 14569 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
Trijicon accupoint I really like the new additions to the accupoint line too like 1-4x30 scope and the new green reticle(s). |
||||||||||||||
“A hunt based only on trophies taken falls far short of what the ultimate goal should be.” – Fred Bear
|
||||||||||||||
RifleDude
MODERATOR EVIL OPPRESSOR Joined: October/13/2006 Location: Texas Status: Offline Points: 16337 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
Keep in mind that the optics of the Zeiss Conquest series are produced by Meopta, so the Conquest is likely to be optically comparable to Meopta. Unlike Conquest, I have no experience with Meopta to confirm, though. Overall, I've heard pretty good things about Meopta from a performance standpoint, but mixed reviews on their customer service. Again, I haven't used one in the field, so I can't comment on their quality either way. I do have an IOR scope that I've been very pleased with, but it is the 4-14X50 tactical model. I'm sure the 6X42 IOR is probably excellent as well. I personally would avoid Docter scopes due to customer service issues. I'd rather go with more prominent brands of known quality for the same price tag that I know I could get good service on should I need it. If my choice was limited only to the scopes you listed, I would get either the IOR 6X42 if I was leaning toward a fixed power or the Meopta 1.5-6X42 if a variable was the choice. |
||||||||||||||
Ted
Money can't buy happiness... but it's much more comfortable to cry in a Porsche than on a bicycle. |
||||||||||||||
RifleDude
MODERATOR EVIL OPPRESSOR Joined: October/13/2006 Location: Texas Status: Offline Points: 16337 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
j.chappell
In your stated price range, and given all your other criteria (EXCEPT illumination), I would actually go with the Trijicon Accupoint 3-9X40 w/green BAC triangle reticle, without question. I have this scope, except mine has the amber reticle, and I absolutely love it! If you haven't seen one of these scopes, they may change your mind about lit reticles, since the Accupoint's illumination system is unique. Keep in mind that illumination in this scope isn't battery powered, but instead it uses a combination of fiber optics and tritium. So, if the presence of electronics on the scope is the main objection to illuminated reticles, that's a non-issue with this scope. Optically, I think they are on par with the Zeiss Conquest. |
||||||||||||||
Ted
Money can't buy happiness... but it's much more comfortable to cry in a Porsche than on a bicycle. |
||||||||||||||
Tip69
Optics Master Extraordinaire Tip Stick Joined: September/27/2005 Location: Nebraska Status: Offline Points: 4155 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
My only concern with Meopta, is the rather short eye relief. If you can live with that, it might be just the ticket for you.
|
||||||||||||||
take em!
|
||||||||||||||
j.chappell
Optics GrassHopper Joined: March/20/2009 Status: Offline Points: 17 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
I thank everyone for all of the helpful info. There isnt a shop near me that stocks the Trijicon's. I looked at them on line becasue I needed a 1-4 a while back but just couldnt bring myself to order something I havent seen firsthand.
I am leaning to a fixed 6x and more to the Leupold now for a few reasons. I only wish I had all the models of interest at hand for a side by side.
J.
|
||||||||||||||
bugsNbows
Optics God bowsNbugs Joined: March/10/2008 Location: North Georgia Status: Offline Points: 11200 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
Another choice would be the 4 X 32 Zeiss Conquest. It's trim, has good glass and durable. I had a Meopta Meostar. The eye relief was short (about 3 inches as I recall) and I did not care for the reticle selections, but optically it was very good.
|
||||||||||||||
If we're not suppose to eat animals...how come they're made of meat?
Anomymous |
||||||||||||||
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |