New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: New nikon slughunter 1.65-5 x 36mm
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

New nikon slughunter 1.65-5 x 36mm

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
couch8 View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper


Joined: December/16/2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5
  Quote couch8 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: New nikon slughunter 1.65-5 x 36mm
    Posted: March/03/2009 at 22:39
Just wondering if anyone has tried the new nikon slughunter 1.65-5 X 36mm. I heard alot of talk about the old one that was a 3-9 X40 being to much scope for a shotgun. Just seeing what you guys thought.
Back to Top
bigdust View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper


Joined: October/08/2009
Location: virginia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7
  Quote bigdust Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November/03/2009 at 19:47
I bought a camo nikon slughunter 3-9x40 scope (camo nikon rings) and it looks great on my camo mossberg 500 trophey slugster w/integral barrel.  With 2 3/4 Winchester XP3's its a 200 yrd. nail driving machine.
SLUG ON...
Back to Top
martin3175 View Drop Down
Optics Master
Optics Master
Avatar

Joined: January/19/2005
Location: Maryland
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2605
  Quote martin3175 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November/12/2009 at 07:15

IMO a 3-9 on a black powder is a touch too much , but do-able .. I like 2-7 or similar for the low end magnification at close range .

Back to Top
lucytuma View Drop Down
Optics Master
Optics Master
Avatar

Joined: November/25/2007
Location: Wisconsin
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2440
  Quote lucytuma Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November/12/2009 at 10:21
I think Nikon did the right thing by adding the  1.5-6x36 scope to slug hunter line, this power range is more appropriate to a slug gun IMO.
Yes Dear!
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.047 seconds.