Visit the SWFA.com site to check out our current specials. |
1-4 vari-II vs. 1.5-5 vari-III vs. 1-4 Mark 2? |
Post Reply |
Author | |||||||
bhk
Optics GrassHopper Joined: January/10/2009 Status: Offline Points: 3 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: January/15/2009 at 13:16 |
||||||
I am still looking for the perfect low power scope for my coyote calling AR for very close to medium ranges. The vari-III is on sale now, but is still 60 bucks more expensive than the vari-II. Are the differences worth the cost? Some shooting will be near dusk, but certainly not after dark.
Also, is the Mark 2 simply a vari-III is subdued disguise with a different power ring? Same glass?
|
|||||||
pyro6999
Optics Retard OT TITAN Joined: December/22/2006 Location: North Dakota Status: Offline Points: 22034 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||
you mean vx3 right?
|
|||||||
They call me "Boots"
375H&H Mag: Yeah, it kills stuff "extra dead" 343 we will never forget God Bless Chris Ledoux "good ride cowboy" |
|||||||
lucytuma
Optics Jedi Knight Joined: November/25/2007 Location: Wisconsin Status: Offline Points: 5389 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||
Might also want to consider the weaver v3 1-3 power. Not as good as the Leupolds above, but fairly decent.
|
|||||||
"The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not." - Thomas Jefferson
|
|||||||
bhk
Optics GrassHopper Joined: January/10/2009 Status: Offline Points: 3 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||
Yes, I mean the vx series. Thanks. I would correct my OP but don't see any edit options.
|
|||||||
Tip69
Optics Master Extraordinaire Tip Stick Joined: September/27/2005 Location: Nebraska Status: Offline Points: 4155 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||
I would say the vx III is $60 better than the vx II. |
|||||||
take em!
|
|||||||
pyro6999
Optics Retard OT TITAN Joined: December/22/2006 Location: North Dakota Status: Offline Points: 22034 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||
me too, they arent really even similar other than the gold ring and name on the side, the vx2 has a two piece tube where the vx3 doesnt, they vx3 has better glass and coatings, that right there has to be worth every bit of $60
|
|||||||
They call me "Boots"
375H&H Mag: Yeah, it kills stuff "extra dead" 343 we will never forget God Bless Chris Ledoux "good ride cowboy" |
|||||||
Rancid Coolaid
MODERATOR Joined: January/19/2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 9318 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||
Trijicon TR21, Nightforce, Bushnell, USO: many routes I'd take before Leupold, but if it is what you want, go for it.
|
|||||||
Freedom is something you take.
Respect is something you earn. Equality is something you whine about not being given. |
|||||||
huff143
Optics Journeyman Joined: December/08/2008 Location: Kansas City Status: Offline Points: 304 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||
Mark 2 glass is like VXII glass.
Mark 4 glass is more like VXIII glass.
So, the VXIII is a definite upgrade over the Mk 2. Spend a little extra and get the better glass.
|
|||||||
Urimaginaryfrnd
MODERATOR Resident Redneck Joined: June/20/2005 Location: Iowa Status: Offline Points: 14964 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||
I picked up a VX-III 1.5-5x20 the other day when I stumbled across one severly discounted. After a little time playing with it and comparing to my night optics ( TA442, comp M4, TAO1b and Illuminated Mk 4 ) I have to say I like the scope but feel that an illuminated reticle would really help a coyote rig if you hunt low light or night. I really think any of the 2moa dot aimpoints would be a good pick for that use out to 200 yds. I think the Trijicon Accupoint scopes would be ideal. As far as traditional optics this one is close enough in price to really merit consideration.
Edited by Urimaginaryfrnd - January/15/2009 at 19:39 |
|||||||
"Always do the right thing, just because it is the right thing to do". Bobby Paul Doherty Texas Ranger |
|||||||
puppezed
Optics GrassHopper Joined: December/31/2008 Location: Finland Status: Offline Points: 44 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||
Bushnell 4200 1.25-4x24 should be a great scope for the price and also has an illuminated reticle.
If you want scopes which are as close to true 1x as possible, check out Burris EuroDiamond / XTR Xtreme Tac 1-4x24 and Meopta R1 1-4x22. Both scopes have models with and without illumination. These scopes (and especially the Meopta) have been found to be good scopes in 3-gun matches and I see no reason why they wouldn´t work in hunting too. Review of Meopta R1 1-4x22 K-Dot: http://www.packpractical.com/reviews/meopta.php |
|||||||
tahqua
MODERATOR Have You Driven A Ford Lately? Joined: March/27/2006 Location: Michigan, USA Status: Offline Points: 9042 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||
I have moved a 1.5-5x20 Leupold around on various guns. It is not very good in low light where a lot of coyote movement occurs.
I would suggest at least a 24mm minimum on the objective lens for a low range variable. Of course higher quality scopes should be a part of the equation if you can afford them. If you want a low power Leupold I would look at the 1.75-6x32. |
|||||||
deer slayyer
Optics GrassHopper Joined: April/15/2009 Status: Offline Points: 4 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||
i think u should get the vrx 3 i have one on my coyote gun
its worth the extra money
|
|||||||
Cameron
Optics GrassHopper Joined: August/14/2007 Status: Offline Points: 6 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||
I second that. C |
|||||||
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |